-
Posts
1,840 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
nate_sf reacted to DznNYC in One provider for two clients?
THIS is a situation I've never encountered before, but sounds super hot!
-
nate_sf reacted to Aamir in One provider for two clients?
Thank you for the post @nate_sf. I think two men paying for a provider is a really hot prospect. Not a couple, just two clients who normality hire collaborating on a provider. Hiring can often be lonely and isolating. No one to talk to about the experience. How much better to enjoy the time with another client. Looking forward to hiring you with another client soon Nate since I'm in SF too. And we promise to not make it twice the work. Hopefully it will be twice the fun for you. Again, i really appreciate the insight. And DM me if you know if more SF providers who are like you.
-
nate_sf got a reaction from Rod Hagen in One provider for two clients?
I'm with @DznNYC and @Rod Hagen on this one, I don't charge extra for couples. My fee is for my time, whether it's one, two, or more guys.
In fairness, navigating a couple takes some special attention, as you don't want one to feel left out. But that's also part of the fun, making sure everyone is having a good time.
-
nate_sf got a reaction from MikeBiDude in One provider for two clients?
I'm with @DznNYC and @Rod Hagen on this one, I don't charge extra for couples. My fee is for my time, whether it's one, two, or more guys.
In fairness, navigating a couple takes some special attention, as you don't want one to feel left out. But that's also part of the fun, making sure everyone is having a good time.
-
nate_sf reacted to DznNYC in One provider for two clients?
I love working with couples! It’s honestly my favorite scene, especially if it’s a vers situation for me.
Since I charge for my time, I’ve never asked for a couples surcharge. My rate is my rate.
-
nate_sf got a reaction from jimbosf in And we're back...
@RadioRob your efforts are heroic! Many thanks for all you do.
-
nate_sf got a reaction from JourneysEnd in And we're back...
@RadioRob your efforts are heroic! Many thanks for all you do.
-
nate_sf got a reaction from + sync in And we're back...
@RadioRob your efforts are heroic! Many thanks for all you do.
-
nate_sf got a reaction from liubit in And we're back...
@RadioRob your efforts are heroic! Many thanks for all you do.
-
nate_sf got a reaction from + Charlie in And we're back...
@RadioRob your efforts are heroic! Many thanks for all you do.
-
nate_sf got a reaction from mike carey in And we're back...
@RadioRob your efforts are heroic! Many thanks for all you do.
-
nate_sf reacted to RadioRob in And we're back...
Greetings folks...
As you might have noticed, this site has been offline since around mid-day Tuesday. Our prior hosting provider decided that they are unable to continue hosting our website and had ended service to us. Unfortunately they did not provide any notification to me about this decision and I was forced to move the site to a new server without any sort of heads up. This includes arranging for the new hosting company, configuring the new server to meet the technical requirements, getting a copy of our current data, restoring that data (over 300GB of files), recovering the database (over 18.5 million records in that database taking up 11GB of space for the DB alone), and reconfiguring the software itself to run in the new environment.
While migrating there was also some technical issues that I ran into that required me to coordinate with Invision's technical support team. So that back and forth added additional time to the mix as well.
And to pile on further… all of this occurred while I'm traveling for my day job. So I've been doing this while in a hotel in between doing my day job on the road.
There are most likely several other things that will need to be fixed still and I'm working through them. For example, email may only be partially working. I still need to setup things like SPF and DKIM for the new server so our emails don't flag as spam. There are other settings that might need to be redone to work in the new server as well that I'm not thinking about yet. (As you might have imagined, I've not had much sleep during this whole process.)
But anyway... you get the idea. No... we're not going anywhere! This was a minor setback but we'll continue to move forward. Thank you all for your understanding and support!
Rob
-
nate_sf got a reaction from Boaxxx in One provider for two clients?
Gays usually call it a three-way, whereas straights call it a threesome. 😛
-
nate_sf got a reaction from Rod Hagen in One provider for two clients?
Gays usually call it a three-way, whereas straights call it a threesome. 😛
-
nate_sf got a reaction from Boaxxx in Site for kink clients/providers
Welcome back to the game, and to Company of Men!
I'm not aware of any escorting sites that specialize in kinky providers. There's sites and apps like Fetlife and Recon, but those are more for networking and hookups. Not sure how escorting would work there.
At least in the US, Rentmen is the only real show in town. But it's totally fine to present yourself as a kinky provider. I see listings all the time where both the photos and description indicate interest and specialization in kink.
-
nate_sf got a reaction from Whippoorwill in One provider for two clients?
Gays usually call it a three-way, whereas straights call it a threesome. 😛
-
nate_sf got a reaction from + Vegas_Millennial in One provider for two clients?
Gays usually call it a three-way, whereas straights call it a threesome. 😛
-
nate_sf got a reaction from pubic_assistance in One provider for two clients?
Gays usually call it a three-way, whereas straights call it a threesome. 😛
-
nate_sf reacted to + PhileasFogg in One provider for two clients?
I appreciate the clarification. I truly had no idea. Being bi, I suppose I can go both ways?? 😉😅😇
Edited to add: I just consulted the ChatGpT oracle that suggested threesome is gender neutral and that three way is simply “raunchier.”
-
nate_sf got a reaction from + KensingtonHomo in One provider for two clients?
Gays usually call it a three-way, whereas straights call it a threesome. 😛
-
nate_sf got a reaction from SirBillybob in One provider for two clients?
Gays usually call it a three-way, whereas straights call it a threesome. 😛
-
nate_sf got a reaction from + PhileasFogg in One provider for two clients?
Gays usually call it a three-way, whereas straights call it a threesome. 😛
-
nate_sf reacted to Gilfson in Providers requiring Client photo to meet!?
There you go. Pic is gone. Am I now allowed to enjoy this site now that I meet your standards? Oh gosh I sure hope so😩
-
nate_sf reacted to LAWestKC in Newbie Question
Quick update: We're getting together Sat night! I'll let you know how it goes. I am really horned up and excited for this.
He prefers in-calls. Anything advice or anything I should know?
-
nate_sf got a reaction from thomas in Newbie Question
Along with @italianboyph I'll confirm from the provider side that asking for foot play is not unusual at all. Yes it's fun! I really enjoy it and am happy whenever a guy proposes it.