Are OnlyFans Models the new online fantasy boyfriend?

[Scott C]

Just curious if others have obsessions with OnlyFans models?   Which models are worth the fee?  Which are not?

[Mark_fl]

Not for me. No interest in that, sexting, private videos or zoom meetings. Does nothing for me except make me feel embarrassed for the performer and skeevy for myself.

I wouldn't even ask a potential provider for additional pictures if I can see their face and body type.

In person or not interested. 

Edited Friday at 10:20 PM by Mark_fl

[BonVivant]

Fantasy BFs are the new AI bois. 

[bimuscle]

Totally agree with everything that’s been said above. I just hope I’m dead and in the grave before I see people start having sex with an AI generated person.

[BonVivant]

1 hour ago, bimuscle said:

Totally agree with everything that’s been said above. I just hope I’m dead and in the grave before I see people start having sex with an AI generated person.

I don't know…. Imagine being able to custom order to your specs?  Hmmmmm. 

[Whoisyourdaddy]

Digital voyeurism only does so much for me. Some of these OF guys are asking hundreds for private videos. Why pay for that when you can just pay for the real thing? Also, once I've seen a model cum 1-2 times, I'm ready to move on to the next model.

[+ ApexNomad]

18 minutes ago, BonVivant said:

I don't know…. Imagine being able to custom order to your specs?  Hmmmmm. 

How boring life would be. 

[d.anders]

From what I've been reading about OnlyFans, most models are way too busy to manage their own accounts. It is a complete gamble. Many models are not handling their communications, and it's impossible to tell. I suppose if an offer is high enough for a private or a custom show, someone can put you in touch with the real deal. It all seems like a crap shoot to me, and the business model is to rob the client of his money, and offer as little as possible in return. That's the game. I sincerely doubt you're getting anything near what resembles a fun boyfriend experience, hot sex, or even a fabulous virtual massage. This is a true case of buyer beware, if you ask me.

[DMonDude]

47 minutes ago, BonVivant said:

I don't know…. Imagine being able to custom order to your specs?  Hmmmmm. 

Yeah this was the appeal for me way back when i was into OF. Back during the pandemic, OF was the only place i could go to find my hyper specific type of guy doing adult content because my type was outside of the usual conventionally attractive model looking guys and even the acceptable alternatives to that that are now mainstream too, like bears. So i was able to find the exact kind of guys i liked and i could have them do exactly what i wanted them to do. And that was enough advantage over free porn that it was worth certain subscription prices to me.

It's especially appealing if you aren't very sexually active and/or aren't already hiring guys for in person fun. I think the audience here is likely heavily biased against finding value or use in OF because basically everyone here are used to in person hiring as clients. If that's the easily available and affordable option to you, then OF is of no use and not worth any of what OF creators charge just for photos/videos. But if you're the more average person who doesn't know about or can't afford hiring providers. OF can be a viable fun activity, especially if you aren't super sexually active yourself and aren't finding what you want in free porn. The free to $15 a month can easily become worth it.

29 minutes ago, Whoisyourdaddy said:

Digital voyeurism only does so much for me. Some of these OF guys are asking hundreds for private videos. Why pay for that when you can just pay for the real thing? Also, once I've seen a model cum 1-2 times, I'm ready to move on to the next model.

But yeah guys starting to ask for 200-500 (or more!) for basic sex tapes happening around the same time i got into hiring is what made me fully ditch OF. If i was going to hit those kinda numbers, hiring providers gives drastically more value for that same price range.

Edited Friday at 11:46 PM by DMonDude

[bimuscle]

Just to clarify my statement about AI generated sex toy sex models. Just imagine how socially inept this world will become. People have a hard enough time communicating with each other. Just imagine if you were working from home you never had to leave home to have sex. You would be totally screwed in a group setting. 

[+ SirBillybob]

9 hours ago, bimuscle said:

… You would be totally screwed in a group setting. 

As if that wouldn’t be hard enough.

[FootLuvr]

I personally like OnlyFans engagements, but I feel like many of these guys are using AI bots for chats and that’s a huge turn off for me. It’s gotten to the point where I’m no longer getting enjoyment from online chat. I don’t personally want to have an IRL encounter but I do want to know that I’m having real conversations. 

Maybe the guys I follow have gotten too big… any recs for more “amateur” models?

[+ SirBillybob]

20 hours ago, Scott C said:

Just curious if others have obsessions with OnlyFans models?   Which models are worth the fee?  Which are not?

Most of the rare times I’ve subscribed at very little relative expense were to gather more image intel to seal a hire deal. Not disappointed so far. Also post hoc memory augmentation. So not uncoupled. 

[marylander1940]

21 hours ago, Scott C said:

Just curious if others have obsessions with OnlyFans models?   Which models are worth the fee?  Which are not?

 

19 hours ago, Mark_fl said:

Not for me. No interest in that, sexting, private videos or zoom meetings. Does nothing for me except make me feel embarrassed for the performer and skeevy for myself.

I wouldn't even ask a potential provider for additional pictures if I can see their face and body type.

In person or not interested. 

For most people porno/erotic videos are good for one thing... self-pleasuring themselves and go back to real life.

Some folks might consider engaging in chats with bots just like they talk to Alexa, but most wouldn't do that. 

 

Edited Saturday at 01:18 PM by marylander1940

[Scott C]

There is one guy for his monthly content I find motivating for fitness...  I have purchased a couple of his videos (on the expensive side)...  I do not know or am promoting Dave, but he is physically quite stunning, and it is easy to find his instagram as well...   eroticstrength

https://onlyfans.com/eroticstrength

[d.anders]

On 4/18/2026 at 10:23 AM, Scott C said:

There is one guy for his monthly content I find motivating for fitness...

I'm sure there are plenty of OF people with the desire to provide a legit service, and get paid for that service. However, unless sex is part of the service, OF has become a questionable space. I've seen a few YT videos on the history of OF. Interesting story. They've had some trouble trying to figure out who they are and who they want to be, and it's quite possible they could close the door on a dime, depending on a sale, or how all the sex work goes.

I like the name eroticstrength. It's too bad the OF home page user interface can't offer more photos to describe what a service offers. You only get words to describe why you should join someone's account. I never really liked OF UI. I always thought it had potential, but, for me, it's a watered down Facebook experience, with no photos.

[+ purplekow]

On 4/17/2026 at 2:46 PM, bimuscle said:

Totally agree with everything that’s been said above. I just hope I’m dead and in the grave before I see people start having sex with an AI generated person.

Too late

[jeezifonly]

As someone who used to rent VHS-captured video husbands, I've always thrived on variety. The actions taking place, and the degree of interpersonal chemistry being captured are more "stimulating" to me than relying on an ultra-specific type of man. I will fork over "super fan" money for a couple months, but never request custom or live options. I prefer to remain anonymous to the performer –  one of the wonderful people out there in the dark. 

 

[+ SirBillybob]

On 4/17/2026 at 6:46 PM, bimuscle said:

Totally agree with everything that’s been said above. I just hope I’m dead and in the grave before I see people start having sex with an AI generated person.

I rather think that dead resolves the scheduling conflict. Burial is just added admin. 

Edited yesterday at 08:03 PM by SirBillybob

[+ SirBillybob]

1 hour ago, jeezifonly said:

As someone who used to rent VHS-captured video husbands, I've always thrived on variety. The actions taking place, and the degree of interpersonal chemistry being captured are more "stimulating" to me than relying on an ultra-specific type of man. I will fork over "super fan" money for a couple months, but never request custom or live options. I prefer to remain anonymous to the performer –  one of the wonderful people out there in the dark. 

I agree a lot to be said for keeping the fourth wall intact and refraining from installing a coin slot to keep the line open. The pressure …

Edited yesterday at 07:56 PM by SirBillybob