Providers less and less willing to unlock private pics

[mike carey]

2 minutes ago, Cretus said:

I took the quote below by Boink as implying that he starts a dialog only after the provider agrees to unlock the gallery.
 

“When they DO unlock the gallery, I make it a point to thank them and THEN start a dialog and take it from there.”

Fair point.

[Boink]

13 minutes ago, Cretus said:

I took the quote below by Boink as implying that he starts a dialog only after the provider agrees to unlock the gallery.
 

“When they DO unlock the gallery, I make it a point to thank them and THEN start a dialog and take it from there.”

Not to belabor this topic, but if they can assume that I'm a time waster / game player by innocently asking to see their private gallery, I can assume they're either friendly for opening it or UNfriendly for displaying a big red "Request Rejected" sign.  Why should I risk hiring someone who shows me unfriendliness with no reason?  They're being cautious, but so am I.

And, being neither here nor there, I've had nice exchanges with providers whom I did NOT ask to unlock their private gallery.

[Cretus]

13 minutes ago, Boink said:

Not to belabor this topic, but if they can assume that I'm a time waster / game player by innocently asking to see their private gallery, I can assume they're either friendly for opening it or UNfriendly for displaying a big red "Request Rejected" sign.  Why should I risk hiring someone who shows me unfriendliness with no reason?  They're being cautious, but so am I.

And, being neither here nor there, I've had nice exchanges with providers whom I did NOT ask to unlock their private gallery.

Providers are not necessarily assuming you are a time waster- they may just have no signals about you at *all*, and choose to not interact due to the uncertainty.

 

I am a client, and I have my own private gallery with pics of my bubble butt and big dick. I sometimes get escorts who want to see my client private album, and the options I can select on the request are always a plain "Yes or "No" button, and nothing else. I don't think someone pressing "No" is a sign of unfriendliness to individuals who want to see my private pictures without any prior substantive chat or inquiry. 

 

That's great that you had nice exchanges with providers whom you didn't ask to unlock their private gallery. I don't take the private gallery being opened as the only factor that determines whether a client-provider meeting will happen and whether it will be successful.

Edited yesterday at 05:24 AM by Cretus

[jackcali]

I'm not sure what all the hubbub is about.  I am pretty sure I'm interested in hiring a provider from his ad even without seeing his private pics or the locked pics that I can only see with a premium membership (which I don't have).  After that, it's more the compatibility of our interests and the ability to schedule conveniently. 

The private pics are more for confirmation of what I've seen than the decision-maker in my choosing to hire.  My habit is to send a message on RM to the provider saying I'm interested and directing him to my RM profile (stats, interests, def no pics).  After that I hit the button for access to the private pics.  Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, but I've given the provider  all the information he needs to decide whether to carry the conversation further.