Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, pubic_assistance said:

Seriously ? How OLD are you ?? 🤔 I assumed EVERYONE over 12 years old knows that FOX "news" is a propaganda feed. 

Old enough to use obvious sarcasm in replying to your post.  I am also pretty sure that your take on Colbert is a propaganda feed is hyperbole.  He definitely has a point of view but if you watched with any regularity you would have heard many Biden jokes when Biden was in office.  

Note the quotes around "News"

Posted
9 hours ago, purplekow said:

I find this statement specious.  I do not have children.  I do pay school taxes.   There are many other examples of services that are offered to the public of which most people do not partake and yet they are financed by taxes.   I am not forcing people who do not listen to foot the bill, I am stating that a society that values educational television and radio should have no difficulty spending tax money on insuring that it exists.  That this administration has no difficulty supporting other programs which I find abhorrent, does not mean others should be deprived of them.  

 

You’re comparing apples & oranges, or maybe even apples & drywall.  I don’t have children either, but it is pretty much a unanimous belief that all of us as a society benefit by educating children, therefore, schooling is provided to each and every child regardless of parents’ ability to pay.  In stark contrast, support for taxpayer funding for PBS and NPR is nowhere near unanimous.  

We could debate item-for-item on the federal budget on another forum, but not here because that discussion would be far too political.

Back on topic … I heard a great line about Stephen Colbert’s cancellation:  “The Late Show” was losing $40 million a year.  Its cancellation isn’t censorship; it’s capitalism.

Posted
3 hours ago, BSR said:

You’re comparing apples & oranges, or maybe even apples & drywall.  I don’t have children either, but it is pretty much a unanimous belief that all of us as a society benefit by educating children, therefore, schooling is provided to each and every child regardless of parents’ ability to pay.  In stark contrast, support for taxpayer funding for PBS and NPR is nowhere near unanimous.  

We could debate item-for-item on the federal budget on another forum, but not here because that discussion would be far too political.

Back on topic … I heard a great line about Stephen Colbert’s cancellation:  “The Late Show” was losing $40 million a year.  Its cancellation isn’t censorship; it’s capitalism.

Snopes tried to validate the claim about the “$40 million loss a year.” They could not find credible sources, just media outlets quoting each other.  What is the source of your “great line”? 

Posted

The original source of thr claim is Matthew Belloni, Puck's founding partner and author of the report on Colbert's show. He told Snopes that he obtained the information in his article "from multiple anonymous sources with knowledge of the show's finances." He added that the $40 million number was "subsequently confirmed by multiple outlets," including The Wall Street Journal.

Stephen Colbert’s ‘Late Show’ Was Canceled After Losing Tens of Millions - WSJ https://share.google/78xXy2fjZBShm2JeX

Posted

Administrator’s Message

Gentlemen, 

Just a reminder: Some of you are taking this thread off topic. It’s not a discussion about FOX News or any other TV news station. That can be viewed by some as political. Stick to the thread’s topic or start your own thread. 

Posted
On 7/20/2025 at 2:53 PM, pubic_assistance said:

I've tried watching Colbert's show several times, under the impression it was a comedy show. Seemed more like a propaganda feed to me. Never understood how it stayed on the air as long as it did. 

I watched Colbert's show many many times under the impression it was a comedy show. I love it, I still feel it's a fabulous comedy show, I keep watching it, and I totally understand how it stayed on the air so long.

Posted (edited)

The big NYC rally last week in support of Colbert drew all of 20 protestors.
Well, that certainly shows loyalty. All of his viewers showed up to protest...
Elmo in Times Square draws a bigger crowd.
Seems like only 20 people cared that an arrogant, narcissistic, no-talent, multimillionaire with Stage 4 TDS was losing his job.
The rally bombed - just like his show.

NYPOST.COM

A Big Apple rally in support of on-his-way-out "Late Show" host Stephen Colbert drew no more than 20 people Sunday -- with even the NYPD cops on scene...

Bozo heard Colbert is now in deep rehearsals for his next gig -
Emcee of Open Mic Night at the Ponderosa in Bakersfield.

Those protestors have no pride. I mean the guy is a no-talent bum. Nobody watches his depressing show. There are no advertisers, no audience, no decent guests, nothing except a loss running about $800,000 a week. That is a stunning amount of money for a business to lose each week especially when you have a loose cannon like this jerk badmouthing the owners every time they make a business decision with which he disagrees.
These morons think they are irreplaceable and no one can go on without them. People will get along very nicely without that depressing "comedy" show on television five nights a week, if that is when it was on. This guy is so conceited that he can't conceive that he was cancelled because he is a bitter, no-talent loser, and no one wants to hear his constant whining and complaints for an hour a night. He also couldn't imagine that no one wanted to hear his warped views either because there are very few people who share those whacked out views. So they right away blame the normal people in the country of a conspiracy to get rid of him.

His "brand" of humor alienated half of America - flyover country. And with what was left of the late night audience, he had to battle with Kimmel for their viewership. His appeal was to a limited, niche audience - the TDS infected, NY Times reading, MSNBC watching, Volvo driving, brie eating, Chablis drinking, lunatic fringe who think the View is actually entertainment. He just can't comprehend that he is not that important. No one really cares if his show is on or not because apparently no one watches it. Then he has a staff of two hundred people! Are you kidding me. That certainly sounds like your typical bloated liberal business model. What a loser. He should be thankful he was paid all the money he was over the last few years when he was on.
Bozo read somewhere that he made multiple millions a year, which is a disgrace, but he took it anyway. You'd think he would have as much class as the President and donate part or all, as the President does, of his salary to charity. Not going to happen.
Hey loser, don't the door bump your butt on the way out.

BTC
🤡

Edited by BOZO T CLOWN
Posted

Really classy if by classy you mean exponentially widening the gap between the haves and have-nots, robbing from the poor to give to the rich, and monetizing his position to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars. What a rate of return on $400K per year!

Posted
2 hours ago, BOZO T CLOWN said:

The big NYC rally last week in support of Colbert drew all of 20 protestors.
Well, that certainly shows loyalty. All of his viewers showed up to protest...
Elmo in Times Square draws a bigger crowd.
Seems like only 20 people cared that an arrogant, narcissistic, no-talent, multimillionaire with Stage 4 TDS was losing his job.
The rally bombed - just like his show.

NYPOST.COM

A Big Apple rally in support of on-his-way-out "Late Show" host Stephen Colbert drew no more than 20 people Sunday -- with even the NYPD cops on scene...

Bozo heard Colbert is now in deep rehearsals for his next gig -
Emcee of Open Mic Night at the Ponderosa in Bakersfield.

Those protestors have no pride. I mean the guy is a no-talent bum. Nobody watches his depressing show. There are no advertisers, no audience, no decent guests, nothing except a loss running about $800,000 a week. That is a stunning amount of money for a business to lose each week especially when you have a loose cannon like this jerk badmouthing the owners every time they make a business decision with which he disagrees.
These morons think they are irreplaceable and no one can go on without them. People will get along very nicely without that depressing "comedy" show on television five nights a week, if that is when it was on. This guy is so conceited that he can't conceive that he was cancelled because he is a bitter, no-talent loser, and no one wants to hear his constant whining and complaints for an hour a night. He also couldn't imagine that no one wanted to hear his warped views either because there are very few people who share those whacked out views. So they right away blame the normal people in the country of a conspiracy to get rid of him.

His "brand" of humor alienated half of America - flyover country. And with what was left of the late night audience, he had to battle with Kimmel for their viewership. His appeal was to a limited, niche audience - the TDS infected, NY Times reading, MSNBC watching, Volvo driving, brie eating, Chablis drinking, lunatic fringe who think the View is actually entertainment. He just can't comprehend that he is not that important. No one really cares if his show is on or not because apparently no one watches it. Then he has a staff of two hundred people! Are you kidding me. That certainly sounds like your typical bloated liberal business model. What a loser. He should be thankful he was paid all the money he was over the last few years when he was on.
Bozo read somewhere that he made multiple millions a year, which is a disgrace, but he took it anyway. You'd think he would have as much class as the President and donate part or all, as the President does, of his salary to charity. Not going to happen.
Hey loser, don't the door bump your butt on the way out.

BTC
🤡

Tell us how you really feel.

Posted
9 hours ago, BOZO T CLOWN said:

His appeal was to a limited, niche audience

 ^ THIS ^

The fact that only 20 people protested the shows cancellation speaks volumes, to the false narrative of Colbert being culturally relevant.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...