caliguy Posted Thursday at 12:55 AM Posted Thursday at 12:55 AM If the initial offer was almost a million by Geffen then I'm sure the settlement was way higher. Enough so that he'll never have to suck another old 🍆 again. 🥳 marylander1940, pubic_assistance, BigDMike and 1 other 1 3
+ nycman Posted Thursday at 01:54 AM Posted Thursday at 01:54 AM 7 hours ago, marylander1940 said: He should join this forum…. I think it’s funny that you think he’s not here…… thomas, mike carey, Whoisyourdaddy and 6 others 2 1 2 4
jeezifonly Posted Thursday at 04:58 AM Posted Thursday at 04:58 AM I bet you picked yours for character, didn't you? And where did it get you? On the train to Reno! L'amour, etc etc... Luv2play, + azdr0710 and + Charlie 1 2
TonyDown Posted Friday at 01:24 AM Posted Friday at 01:24 AM 50k/month for 12 months?? Perhaps Geffen 's team knows the best path to a settlement is starting really low. Yet how did they let him marry without a prenup? I hope Michaels got a much bigger chunk. + Charlie 1
+ BOZO T CLOWN Posted Friday at 11:45 AM Posted Friday at 11:45 AM 10 hours ago, TonyDown said: 50k/month for 12 months?? Perhaps Geffen 's team knows the best path to a settlement is starting really low. Yet how did they let him marry without a prenup? I hope Michaels got a much bigger chunk. Geffen and Michaels were married in California. They resided in California. Isn't that a community property state? Without a pre-nup, wouldn't Michaels be entitled to half of everything? BTC 🤡 + Charlie and pubic_assistance 1 1
dutchal Posted Friday at 12:52 PM Posted Friday at 12:52 PM 1 hour ago, BOZO T CLOWN said: Geffen and Michaels were married in California. They resided in California. Isn't that a community property state? Without a pre-nup, wouldn't Michaels be entitled to half of everything? BTC 🤡 Half of everything acquired during the marriage. + Charlie, BigDMike, caliguy and 2 others 1 1 1 2
BSR Posted Friday at 01:04 PM Posted Friday at 01:04 PM 5 minutes ago, dutchal said: Half of everything acquired during the marriage. Note that does not include unrealized capital gains. For example, if one of Geffen’s stock holdings was valued at $10 million at the start of the marriage and increased to $20 million by the time Geffen filed for divorce but he didn’t sell, he still holds the stock, Michaels gets $0 of the stock’s appreciation. As expected, Geffen’s legal & accounting team knew that CA’s community property laws would adequately protect their client. Gotta admit, I’d love to know how much Michaels manages to squeeze out of his ex sugardaddy husband. caliguy, + BOZO T CLOWN, + Charlie and 1 other 1 2 1
caliguy Posted Friday at 03:48 PM Posted Friday at 03:48 PM 2 hours ago, dutchal said: Half of everything acquired during the marriage. I can't believe Geffen was that stupid. He's well known for being really shrewd with his money. Maybe it's an end of life thing. I mean you can't take it with you. + BOZO T CLOWN, + Charlie and pubic_assistance 1 1 1
+ BOZO T CLOWN Posted Friday at 04:21 PM Posted Friday at 04:21 PM 3 hours ago, BSR said: Note that does not include unrealized capital gains. For example, if one of Geffen’s stock holdings was valued at $10 million at the start of the marriage and increased to $20 million by the time Geffen filed for divorce but he didn’t sell, he still holds the stock, Michaels gets $0 of the stock’s appreciation. As expected, Geffen’s legal & accounting team knew that CA’s community property laws would adequately protect their client. Gotta admit, I’d love to know how much Michaels manages to squeeze out of his ex sugardaddy husband. Wouldn't the dividends, interest, royalties, realized capital gains, and other income that flowed into Geffen's accounts during their 3-year marriage be in the tens of millions? BTC 🤡 Luv2play and pubic_assistance 2
dutchal Posted Friday at 04:44 PM Posted Friday at 04:44 PM 23 minutes ago, BOZO T CLOWN said: Wouldn't the dividends, interest, royalties, realized capital gains, and other income that flowed into Geffen's accounts during their 3-year marriage be in the tens of millions? BTC 🤡 Undoubtedly. pubic_assistance 1
mike carey Posted Friday at 04:52 PM Posted Friday at 04:52 PM Any discussion about marital property/community property most likely depends on whether assets were held personally or in trusts or companies. Trusts and companies are separate legal entities, not necessarily property brought into a marriage. Trustees have a fiduciary duty to the trust, not to any beneficiaries. They may be completely immune to consideration in divorce proceedings, or at least easily demonstrated not to have been co-mingled with marital assets. His high-priced lawyers would have no doubt considered how fire-proof those arrangements were when advising him on the need for a prenup. Luv2play and pubic_assistance 1 1
marylander1940 Posted Friday at 04:54 PM Posted Friday at 04:54 PM 5 hours ago, BOZO T CLOWN said: Geffen and Michaels were married in California. They resided in California. Isn't that a community property state? Without a pre-nup, wouldn't Michaels be entitled to half of everything? BTC 🤡 pubic_assistance and Luv2play 2
+ Act25 Posted Friday at 05:08 PM Posted Friday at 05:08 PM 39 minutes ago, BOZO T CLOWN said: Wouldn't the dividends, interest, royalties, realized capital gains, and other income that flowed into Geffen's accounts during their 3-year marriage be in the tens of millions? BTC 🤡 I'm not an attorney... but I believe that only applies to community property and assets brought into a marriage are not community property. It is likely that all of Geffen's investments are his separate property. In community property states wages are considered community property and while there is not likely W-2 income, there could be consulting income, board compensation, etc. I agree with the comment that Geffen's advisors knew what they were doing. marylander1940, caliguy and mike carey 1 2
+ nycman Posted Friday at 10:06 PM Posted Friday at 10:06 PM I don’t think we need to be worrying about David Geffen’s lawyers and accountants. Trust me, he’s incredibly well protected. The whore will get paid well. But he won’t get even 1/10th of 1% of David’s worth. David is no fool. And even if he were, his accounts and lawyers aren’t. The rest of you take note: if you’re gonna marry a hooker, make sure lawyers and accountants are involved from the very first date. caliguy and pubic_assistance 1 1
dutchal Posted Friday at 11:25 PM Posted Friday at 11:25 PM https://www.irs.gov/publications/p555 marylander1940 1
caliguy Posted Saturday at 12:20 AM Posted Saturday at 12:20 AM Chatgpt.. marylander1940, Whoisyourdaddy and pubic_assistance 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now