Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A male photographer alleges in a sexual battery lawsuit filed in New York that Sean “Diddy” Combs demanded fellatio in exchange for professional advancement.

Going almost TMI, John Doe claims that after Diddy ejaculated in his mouth, he ordered the photographer/PA to carry “semen in his mouth like a squirrel.” Refusing the command, the plaintiffs says he went back to work “grappling not only with the trauma of the situation, but with the knowledge that he had Combs’ semen on and inside of his body.”

John Doe never met Combs again and the former’s pledge to assist the latter’s career never transpired.

DEADLINE.COM

The latest alleged sexual assault lawsuit against Sean Combs as filed as the performer faces a criminal trial in May

 

Posted
8 hours ago, Ali Gator said:

A male photographer alleges in a sexual battery lawsuit filed in New York that Sean “Diddy” Combs demanded fellatio in exchange for professional advancement.

Going almost TMI, John Doe claims that after Diddy ejaculated in his mouth, he ordered the photographer/PA to carry “semen in his mouth like a squirrel.” Refusing the command, the plaintiffs says he went back to work “grappling not only with the trauma of the situation, but with the knowledge that he had Combs’ semen on and inside of his body.”

John Doe never met Combs again and the former’s pledge to assist the latter’s career never transpired.

DEADLINE.COM

The latest alleged sexual assault lawsuit against Sean Combs as filed as the performer faces a criminal trial in May

 

I think you meant to say the latter’s pledge to assist the former’s career.

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Ali Gator said:

....he ordered the photographer/PA to carry “semen in his mouth like a squirrel.” Refusing the command....

So....Diddy told some dude if he sucked his cock and water-ballooned his load, he'd open some doors in the industry for him. So the guy volunteers to chug his jizz...and then backs out of the deal...but is now SUING because he has Monday morning regret 🤔?

Unless the failed cum-guzzler was a minor I see absolutely no sexual misconduct here.

The photographer (assuming an adult) could have simply said no.

 

Edited by pubic_assistance
grammar
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Luv2play said:

I think you meant to say the latter’s pledge to assist the former’s career.

I didn't mean to say anything - I just linked to the media site and what they said. 

Edited by Ali Gator
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, pubic_assistance said:

So....Diddy told some dude if he sucked his cock and water-ballooned his load, he'd open some doors in the industry for him. So the guy volunteers to chug his jizz...and then backs out of the deal...but is now SUING because he has Monday morning regret 🤔?

Unless the failed cum-guzzler was a minor I see absolutely no sexual misconduct here.

The photographer (assuming an adult) could have simply said no.

 

Exactly. Unless he can prove he wasn't of 'sound mind and body', or was 'under the influence' unwillingly through the actions of Diddy, this sounds pretty consensual to me. Now he regrets it, and is jumping on the lawsuit train ? Not happening. 

For the record, other sites are reporting that Diddy backed out of the deal and didn't advance the photographer's career BECAUSE he wasn't satisfied in the blow job he received - and Diddy's  personal satisfaction was part of the deal. This should answer @Luv2play post above - other sites are saying he spit it out which 'dissatisfied' Diddy and canceled the agreement.

 

Now....doesn't this kind of sound like the downfall of Harvey Weinstein (only with young up-and-coming actresses back in the day) ? Will all these men come forward and start a MeToo Movement against Diddy ?  

It goes to trial in a matter of weeks (May) and its supposed to be televised each day. I'll be DVRing. 

Edited by Ali Gator
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Ali Gator said:

Now he regrets it, and is jumping on the lawsuit train ? Not happening.

I've read about several female model lawsuits involving famous straight photographers in a similar situation. Even though they did the deed, they won their lawsuits, or at least got a settlement. I'm not a lawyer, and I don't know the changes around #metoo or sex in the workplace. Maybe it pays to file anyway.

WWD.COM

The photographer was once a constant creative resource for Condé Nast and major fashion advertisers.
Edited by d.anders
Posted

Diddy should counter sue for breach of contract. I’m mean it sounds like the little fame whore didn’t carry his “semen in his mouth like a squirrel.” So yeah. Deal’s off squirrel boy!

No one raped him. No one drugged him. He’s an adult. Want an hard job? Go work at McDonalds. Want an easy job, try blowing Diddy. Life’s full of tough choices. 

In the end he got down a blew someone famous for his own gain. The suit should be thrown out and his pathetic $$$ chasing lawyers should be disbarred. 
 

Diddy’s a creep, but in this case “Not Guilty”!

 

Posted
4 hours ago, d.anders said:

I've read about several female model lawsuits involving famous straight photographers in a similar situation. Even though they did the deed, they won their lawsuits, or at least got a settlement. I'm not a lawyer, and I don't know the changes around #metoo or sex in the workplace. Maybe it pays to file anyway.

WWD.COM

The photographer was once a constant creative resource for Condé Nast and major fashion advertisers.

That's different than what's happening here with the photographer and Diddy.  In this case, the photographer did not take sexual advantage of his model and make promises to the model for doing the deed.  Here, the photographer was just getting started with his career. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Ali Gator said:

That's different than what's happening here with the photographer and Diddy.

The differences are obvious. However, it still comes down to someone in power, either by employment status or money or both, subjecting an employee or co-worker to perform sex for business gain.

Posted
4 hours ago, d.anders said:

Not so simple if you have bills and debt up to your ass.

If you have bills and debts up to your ass, and you're not seeking to give sexual favors out to get ahead, you move away from that situation. If you don't mind giving sexual favors, you do it - but you don't sue 2 years later because things didn't work out to your expectations.

Posted
1 minute ago, Ali Gator said:

but you don't sue 2 years later because things didn't work out to your expectations

If someone powerful made a business agreement for sex, and that person backed out for whatever subjective reason, why not sue? I'm not a lawyer, but I will never take the bully's side in these situations. I always feel sorry for the workers who have to endure this shit, whether they choose to oblige or not.

Posted
Just now, d.anders said:

The differences are obvious. However, it still comes down to someone in power, either by employment status or money or both, subjecting an employee or co-worker to perform sex for business gain.

I didn't get the impression that he was hired by or working with / for Diddy. It sounded to me like they met each other at the commercial shoot when introduced to each other, but not that Diddy had hired him or was a coworker of his. As a matter of fact, I didn't get the impression that the photographer was hired by anyone there - sounds like he just showed up at the shoot out of curiosity. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ali Gator said:

I didn't get the impression that he was hired by or working with / for Diddy.

Sorry. If it wasn't an employment scenario, and the photographer was just there as a guest and solicited by chance, then it's difficult to see how any case could be made. But who knows how it affects the Diddy case? It all seems like more ammunition to me.

Posted
7 minutes ago, d.anders said:

If someone powerful made a business agreement for sex, and that person backed out for whatever subjective reason, why not sue? I'm not a lawyer, but I will never take the bully's side in these situations. I always feel sorry for the workers who have to endure this shit, whether they choose to oblige or not.

These agreements are as old as time itself. You probably know them as 'quid pro quo'.

Let's change things up a bit and remove anything sexual between the two : 

Let's say Diddy had met this man at a friend's house, and the guy told him he repaired appliances for a living. Diddy tells him his refrigerator is not working properly - he sets the temp at 35 and the relatively new $10,000 fridge only cools to 45. He needs someone to come by and fix it so it cools down to 35, which is his preference. The guy says that's an easy repair. They 'negotiate' a quid pro quo, and the guy says to Diddy, 'if you can get me two tickets to the Beyonce concert in a few months, I'll do it for you at no charge'. They agree. Diddy says he wants it cooled down to 35, the guy says he will take care of it.

The next day the guy goes over, works on it for a half hour or so, and gets the appliance to cool down to 40. Diddy tells him it's not working to his liking - he asked for it to be 35. That was the deal, and the guy said he could fix it to his specifications. The guy says he did his best and 40 is cool enough for food safety and leaves, thinking he fulfilled his part of the 'qpq' and is expecting Diddy to drop off the tickets to him before the concert in two months. He never does - the 'qpq' was not fulfilled to Diddy's satisfaction. 

Two years after the deal and no concert tickets, the guy sues Diddy. The first thing the Judge asks them is if they had a written agreement on this 'qpq'.  NO ? It was verbal ?  Case dismissed.  

Posted
46 minutes ago, d.anders said:

Sorry. If it wasn't an employment scenario, and the photographer was just there as a guest and solicited by chance, then it's difficult to see how any case could be made. But who knows how it affects the Diddy case? It all seems like more ammunition to me.

I can not wait for this whole thing to go to trial in May. Can not wait ! I'm sure CourtTV will be covering it each day. 

Maybe we're going to have to start a whole new page / forum here just for the court case ! 

Posted
3 hours ago, Ali Gator said:

The first thing the Judge asks them is if they had a written agreement on this 'qpq'.  NO ? It was verbal ?  Case dismissed.

I just Googled, "Are verbal agreements ever legally binding?" Several law sites had interesting responses. I would still try to find a lawyer and sue. Diddy has super-deep pockets.

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Ali Gator said:

I can not wait for this whole thing to go to trial in May. Can not wait ! I'm sure CourtTV will be covering it each day. 

Maybe we're going to have to start a whole new page / forum here just for the court case ! 

Dude - this already happened in Canada! And the escort won.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/former-sex-worker-small-claims-court-national-precedent-1.6896597

To quote: "There was offer, there was an acceptance of the offer, there was certainty of terms, so all the hallmarks of an enforceable contract were there." Although there was no formal contract, and although sex work contracts were not considered legal, the court decided commercial law applied.

Of course, this is Canada. EDIT This would never happen in the states.

Edited by DrownedBoy
last sentence
Posted
1 hour ago, DrownedBoy said:

Dude - this already happened in Canada! And the escort won.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/former-sex-worker-small-claims-court-national-precedent-1.6896597

To quote: "There was offer, there was an acceptance of the offer, there was certainty of terms, so all the hallmarks of an enforceable contract were there." Although there was no formal contract, and although sex work contracts were not considered legal, the court decided commercial law applied.

Of course, this is Canada. EDIT This would never happen in the states.

That's quite different than the photographer / Diddy situation. Diddy didn't hire him as a sexual provider, nor was the photographer presenting himself as such. This wasn't a business deal. 

Posted

If your job requires you to be in the close presence of a star with a huge history of publicly known sexual aggression, and you claim you didn’t know he’s a sexual predator, I hope you also have someone to dress you in the morning and help you find your way back home. 😵‍💫

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...