dutchal Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 https://rentmen.eu/SweetnFitNYC Private pics show a handsome guy (bearded). + azdr0710, Harryinny, TorontoDrew and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ JEC Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 Yum! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaronArtz Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 Nice find, @dutchal You know how to find talent. Is there any fee information available yet? I reached out to him a few minutes ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutchal Posted March 10, 2023 Author Share Posted March 10, 2023 By RM IM says outcalls only, $500/hour. + FrankR, Harryinny, + WstVlgChris and 4 others 2 1 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaBagel Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 Very into him! Blue eyes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaronArtz Posted March 12, 2023 Share Posted March 12, 2023 He quoted me $500 for this: I am looking for a sexually interactive session. You can model some underwear for me. Followed by foreplay and a fuck session. Your ad states you are a verse bottom - I like that. Does that work for you? musclestuduws and claym 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaronArtz Posted March 12, 2023 Share Posted March 12, 2023 (edited) Israelibeauty, on the other hand. quoted me $550 today. Unreal! Edited March 12, 2023 by BaronArtz musclestuduws and + Vegas_Millennial 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc in Calif Posted March 12, 2023 Share Posted March 12, 2023 1 hour ago, coriolis888 said: delusional But we know that there are guys who WILL pay $500 for a session with him. Maybe call them delusional? 🤩 coriolis888 and + WestGuy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ azdr0710 Posted March 12, 2023 Share Posted March 12, 2023 (edited) $500/$550.....I guess that's life in NYC, what with $250M condos and whatnot...... https://www.foodandwine.com/news/nyc-one-dollar-99-cent-pizza-inflation-supply-chain Edited March 12, 2023 by azdr0710 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coriolis888 Posted March 12, 2023 Share Posted March 12, 2023 1 hour ago, Marc in Calif said: But we know that there are guys who WILL pay $500 for a session with him. Maybe call them delusional? 🤩 Of course that could be true if he gets takers at that price. However, there are fewer clients willing to pay $500 than a lesser amount. That means the provider will have to do more work to engage a client. Paying $500.00 on a total stranger without reviews and not knowing if there is any compatibility or even if the ad is genuine is unrealistic, in my opinion. + Coolwave35, BaronArtz, + nycman and 1 other 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walt Posted March 12, 2023 Share Posted March 12, 2023 9 hours ago, coriolis888 said: However, there are fewer clients willing to pay $500 than a lesser amount. That means the provider will have to do more work to engage a client. Or perhaps his business model is that he only wants to see one or maybe two clients a week, so that suits him just fine! 😉 Maybe he is not motivated by the idea of volume, and seeing as many people as possible. coriolis888, musclestuduws and Marc in Calif 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyleham Posted March 12, 2023 Share Posted March 12, 2023 14 hours ago, BaronArtz said: Israelibeauty, on the other hand. quoted me $550 today. Unreal! He quoted me the same +uber costs. Not that beautiful for that kind of money coriolis888 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musclestuduws Posted March 12, 2023 Share Posted March 12, 2023 18 hours ago, BaronArtz said: Israelibeauty, on the other hand. quoted me $550 today. Unreal! I’m starting to think that these outrageous escort rates might be one of the main causes of high inflation. I hope the Federal Reserve takes note! coriolis888, claym, BananaBagel and 3 others 1 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musclestuduws Posted March 12, 2023 Share Posted March 12, 2023 5 hours ago, Walt said: Or perhaps his business model is that he only wants to see one or maybe two clients a week, so that suits him just fine! 😉 Maybe he is not motivated by the idea of volume, and seeing as many people as possible. Agreed. I gather that some escorts choose to work exclusively with “high end” clients who are happy to pay whatever they ask for. Not a bad business model for a sexual worker. It’s surely better for their long term mental and physical health. Marc in Calif 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kko123 Posted March 28, 2023 Share Posted March 28, 2023 On 3/12/2023 at 7:52 PM, coriolis888 said: Most (not all) of the U.S. providers advertise on rentmen. Where are the providers going to find or even know who is "a high end" client based on rentmen advertisements? Providers often call clients "time wasters" because the client asks questions and then when the excessive price of the encounter is disclosed to the client, the "time wasting" client says no. Saying "no" to an unrealistic price is not wasting a providers time. What about the time of the client that is wasted communicating with a possible provider only to learn in the last text message that the provider wants an excessive fee. Time wasting goes both ways. This is largely inaccurate. Plenty of providers work only through social media, instagram, word of mouth etc. and they often are asking for much higher rates than the guys on RM. You sound bitter you can't afford higher rates. + KensingtonHomo, Asterisk, coriolis888 and 1 other 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coriolis888 Posted March 28, 2023 Share Posted March 28, 2023 On 3/12/2023 at 7:13 AM, Walt said: Or perhaps his business model is that he only wants to see one or maybe two clients a week, so that suits him just fine! 😉 Maybe he is not motivated by the idea of volume, and seeing as many people as possible. Certainly possible. If that plan really works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
queensboroboy Posted yesterday at 02:37 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:37 PM Anyone seen him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ JEC Posted yesterday at 03:37 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:37 PM On 3/10/2023 at 9:33 AM, dutchal said: https://rentmen.eu/SweetnFitNYC Private pics show a handsome guy (bearded). Nice Ass-ets! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coriolis888 Posted yesterday at 04:34 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:34 PM (edited) The ad shows that the provider is not truthful. In his ad, under "Safe/bb" he says "safe only" but in looking at his open photos of himself, he shows two naked guys, graphically having anal sex, without a condom. I do not think that hiring an untruthful guy at a high price is worth the risk. What else in his ad is untruthful? Edited yesterday at 04:46 PM by coriolis888 pubic_assistance 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Your Man in Arlington Posted yesterday at 04:41 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:41 PM 5 minutes ago, coriolis888 said: In his ad, under "Safe/bb" he says "safe only" but in looking at his open photos of himself, he shows two naked guys, graphically having anal sex. Some providers are strictly safe-only with clients, but not in their personal life or when creating OF content. musclestuduws and marylander1940 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coriolis888 Posted yesterday at 05:05 PM Share Posted yesterday at 05:05 PM 5 minutes ago, Your Man in Arlington said: Some providers are strictly safe-only with clients, but not in their personal life or when creating OF content. If what you say is true, his ad is contradictory by saying "safe" and also including a photo of two guys having bareback anal sex. His ad is not for OF, it is for sex with anyone willing to pay his asking rate. If he does not do bareback with a client, why show a bareback photo in his ad? The bareback photo causes the ad to be misleading (untruthful) if bareback is not on the menu. Your Man in Arlington, ShortCutie7 and pubic_assistance 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LookingAround Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago In 2024 , in the era of prep, this is still an issue? marylander1940 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ FrankR Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 43 minutes ago, LookingAround said: In 2024 , in the era of prep, this is still an issue? I dont get your point. Neither the year, nor the availability of Prep is an end all solution. Prep protects against HIV but not other STDs. And even in 2024 not everyone can tolerate Prep - some experience severe adverse reactions and stop taking it. musclestuduws 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ FrankR Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 6 hours ago, coriolis888 said: If what you say is true, his ad is contradictory by saying "safe" and also including a photo of two guys having bareback anal sex. His ad is not for OF, it is for sex with anyone willing to pay his asking rate. If he does not do bareback with a client, why show a bareback photo in his ad? The bareback photo causes the ad to be misleading (untruthful) if bareback is not on the menu. His ad says safe only. How about we respect his choice? You, in turn, have the choice not to hire him. We’ll respect your choice too. Your Man in Arlington 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coriolis888 Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, FrankR said: His ad says safe only. How about we respect his choice? You, in turn, have the choice not to hire him. We’ll respect your choice too. You failed to acknowledge that the provider has a large photo in his ad showing bare back anal sex. That makes his ad misleading when his ad says "safe only". It is not logical for an ad to say "safe only" and then, in the same ad, to show active anal sex without a condom. Note: If you do not pay rentmen for a premium account, you will not see the large photos showing bareback sex. Edited 19 hours ago by coriolis888 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now