Jump to content

New York City Weatherman Fired After Webcam Nudes Leak


56harrisond

Recommended Posts

I saw a video of him from the webcam. He was at home wearing an eye mask and waiting for strangers to come into his apartment, on all fours on his couch. Nice body, but not too well endowed. 

I work in the corporate world, and it’s just not a good idea to mention on social media or elsewhere, your employer. That’s the reason for losing his job. Graphic sexual content is a no-no, and I’m no prude, but it was a lapse of good judgment in his case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
On 10/11/2022 at 4:38 PM, nycman said:

Now there’s a man I can “get behind” petitioning to get
his job back after he publishes his homemade porn online!

grin

YES! He's a meaty specimen. I'd love to peel them clothes off him to see what he's working with first, though, before I commit lust in my heart or elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sex shaming on here is shocking to me. A lot of young men are mistakenly assuming what they do on a website of any kind is personal, so he obviously learned it isn't something he should have done. But judging him is rather two-faced. FYI, by such logic, every person on here who has paid for an escort or sexy massage could be turned into their employer and be fired just like Erick was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, JayinHKNYC said:

FYI, by such logic, every person on here who has paid for an escort or sexy massage could be turned into [sic] their employer and be fired just like Erick was.

No. Your "logic" isn't logical at all. And your analogy with hiring escorts is not analogical to the weatherman's actions. Please show us how they're the same.

If you again mention "sex shaming," we'll know you're still on the wrong track. 😎

Edited by Marc in Calif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Marc in Calif said:

No. Your "logic" isn't logical at all. And your analogy with hiring escorts is not analogical to the weatherman's actions. Please show us how they're the same.

If you again mention "sex shaming," we'll know you're still on the wrong track. 😎

You don't even know what logic is. Actually, you're right the analogy is wrong. He didn't do anything illegal by exposing himself online, but hiring escorts is illegal.

I don't shame any of us who hire escorts or masseurs, and I don't shame his sexual activity.

You need to get on the right track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Marc in Calif said:

I think you proved my point right there! You claimed that your analogy WAS your logic (when you wrote "by such logic...").

Now you admit that your analogy was wrong. 🙄

QED

Duh, that was a sarcastic remark, indicating that the situation is even worse for your train of thought. It's obviously impossible to have a conversation with someone unwilling to think through the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JayinHKNYC said:

Yes, you are, and you know it. Or do you? Perhaps you need to look within.

OH HONEEEEY,

NO ONE is sex shaming but COME ON, putting your business online and expecting it to STAY PRIVATE!? Come on, anyone with any kind of intelligence KNOWS what happened to him is possible.

I don't give AF what he does sexually, AT ALL! I was a part of a HORSE MARKET a few months ago. I've done worse. Not sex shaming, but this guy crying about SEXUAL PREDATORS?! LOL. 

But, cool story, bruh. I don't care what you think of me. 

Actions have consequences – good and bad. He willingly put himself on VIDEO and BROADCAST IT. Nobody broke into his phone, etc. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
35 minutes ago, Sensualsmooth said:

"I think I made mistakes"

You THINK you made mistakes???

The reality and the need to take responsibility
for his actions still hasn’t sunk in….sigh. I wish
him well, but the delusion is strong in this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a Free Country. Sorta.
 

The Market may be free, but freer is the right of employers to draw arbitrary lines around behaviors unacceptable to investors as a potential risk to profitability. All that is needed is one more director disgusted by The Gay than those who aren’t. Good luck to those working for fair treatment! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...