Jump to content

seattlebottom

Members
  • Posts

    298
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    seattlebottom got a reaction from Cruiser7 in Providers moving appointment times   
    Maybe I'm misreading this but you'll fire someone who won't come into the office and hire someone from another country who won't be able to come into the office either?  Are you going to sponsor the person and pay for their work visa just so they can show up and work in the office?  Seems like a terrible waste of time and money. 
  2. Like
    seattlebottom reacted to + ThroatCummer in Providers moving appointment times   
    You're not misreading a tall, but the larger message is just lost in translation from being a post here rather than a real-life discussion. I think I wrote all that on a semi-buzzed ramble and the answer is that it's complicated.
    The initial reason for that reply was "CEOs and other executives have announced that the first candidates for layoffs will be the people who refuse to come to the office, or don't get there enough or in a timely manner. An entire generation is going to have to grow up quickly and drop their bad habits."
    And that's the point of the thread -- be on time or communicate, or you'll get passed over. Sure some guys have enough business to not care, but it's the ones who respect and value time (on both sides) that become the legends in this [or any] industry. 
  3. Agree
    seattlebottom got a reaction from pubic_assistance in Why are there so many bisexuals all of a sudden?   
    Bisexual opens the escort up to women and straight couple clientele. 
  4. Like
    seattlebottom reacted to arnie in Doug Inglish pictures   
    Not only are they more attractive but I'm lowering the thermostat  Not only are they better looking but they have more sexuality
  5. Like
    seattlebottom reacted to TorontoDrew in No tip clients   
    I will tip a lower rate like $200 or $250 as long as the session was good.  For the more expensive guys they have to be amazing.
  6. Agree
    seattlebottom reacted to + KensingtonHomo in Opining on the appearance of escorts   
    I don't think this has anything to do with being "woke." Just like honoring someone pronouns, or being a good neighbor, not making negative comments on a provider you've never met, or judging their body harshly, is just being a decent, respectful person. I feel like online anonymity gives people license to behave in ways they never would in person. My general rule is if I wouldn't say this in person, I don't say it online. 
  7. Applause
    seattlebottom reacted to BtmBearDad in Opining on the appearance of escorts   
    It’s not unreasonable at all for hobbyists to judge providers based on our likes/preferences. It’s the manner in which it’s done that’s issue. 

    The OP asked for feedback on this particular provider - totally normal. What I think is unnecessary is when other hobbyists chime in -when they have no experience with the provider, and have no intention to engage them - picking apart the provider’s body, appearance AND talking down to hobbyists about our choices, about how this must be the best we can hope to get, AND THEN proceeds to go on about how sexy, hot they are. It’s just so condescending, so patronizing, and so unnecessary. 

    Now if someone asks for feedback on a provider, and a hobbyist replies they’ve engaged them, and the pictures are out of date, the body is not what the pics show, etc. that’s different. 

    The former is rude, the latter is informative. 

    How many times have I opened a “411” thread, clicked the link, and seen a provider that’s not my type, that I don’t think is attractive? Plenty. But I don’t add a comment to the thread expressing any of that, or any faults I find with his appearance, or any judgement I have for hobbyists who go for that type. I just close the thread, and move on. That’s how this is supposed to work. 

    Just my two cents. I will add a third cent - in anonymous forums when people start talking about how worldly they are, how well heeled they are, how desirable, hot, and sexy they are, my experience has been chances are, they’re none of the above. 
     
    BBD
  8. Like
    seattlebottom reacted to + FreshFluff in "Gone but not forgotten", what fellow posters do you miss?   
    I joined just after Trixie left. I always enjoyed reading his posts about picking up trade. His scouting missions to the Tenderloin in SF were particularly controversial. 
  9. Like
    seattlebottom reacted to + keroscenefire in 411 Konrad Evans in Seattle   
    Overall, I recommend him, though not enthusiastically. PM if you want. 
  10. Like
    seattlebottom reacted to BabyBoomer in 411 Konrad Evans in Seattle   
    @keroscenefire has met him.
    ~Boomer~
  11. Like
    seattlebottom got a reaction from + cougar in "Gone but not forgotten", what fellow posters do you miss?   
    Trixie - came in here around 2005 and had a really neat online persona.  Towards the end of their time here they became kind of down.  They were having issues with a job change and being in a more conservative city if I remember correctly. 
  12. Like
    seattlebottom got a reaction from + azdr0710 in "Gone but not forgotten", what fellow posters do you miss?   
    Trixie - came in here around 2005 and had a really neat online persona.  Towards the end of their time here they became kind of down.  They were having issues with a job change and being in a more conservative city if I remember correctly. 
  13. Like
    seattlebottom reacted to Stormy in What is the pettiest reason you can’t date someone someone?   
    Right wing  ideologues or Trump supporters would be off my list 
  14. Applause
    seattlebottom reacted to Rudynate in What is the pettiest reason you can’t date someone someone?   
    If they have an obnoxious laugh or if they laugh too much
  15. Applause
    seattlebottom reacted to + cougar in What is the pettiest reason you can’t date someone someone?   
    If Republician......
  16. Like
    seattlebottom reacted to menaughty in What is ur favourite GAY SEX position???   
    Hands down Missionary. The one where the other guy is in you and also laying on top you kissing. Lol idk if i explained it right.
    Not a lot of providers are able to do it in my experience but the ones that do...oh la la. It takes me to utopia 😂
    But I do believe that position is easier for man and women. Because how the vagina is located vs anal is further down, so maybe a lot of escorts are not able to do it.
  17. Applause
    seattlebottom got a reaction from + Oliver in Which do you find more attractive?   
    Your dog looks more like a dog while his dog looks like its face was punched in. 
  18. Haha
    seattlebottom got a reaction from + cougar in Which do you find more attractive?   
    Your dog looks more like a dog while his dog looks like its face was punched in. 
  19. Like
    seattlebottom got a reaction from LoadsOfun in FriscoSteve 411   
    At that time he advertised as 36.  He's older than what he advertises but he's one of those guys whose bone structure works at any age.
  20. Like
    seattlebottom reacted to + DynamicUno in 411 SUPERTHICKXXL visiting Las Vegas   
    I tried to see him a while back in SF, he flaked with an excuse about car trouble.  I don't think I'd give him another try.
  21. Agree
    seattlebottom got a reaction from harlow in Caveats in hiring. Please contribute!   
    I've found that guys who are into PNP are not dependable.  For example, IF they show they won't be able to perform.
    Self identified gay guys don't guarantee you a good time.
  22. Like
    seattlebottom got a reaction from raife in Caveats in hiring. Please contribute!   
    I've found that guys who are into PNP are not dependable.  For example, IF they show they won't be able to perform.
    Self identified gay guys don't guarantee you a good time.
  23. Agree
    seattlebottom got a reaction from Danny-Darko in Caveats in hiring. Please contribute!   
    I've found that guys who are into PNP are not dependable.  For example, IF they show they won't be able to perform.
    Self identified gay guys don't guarantee you a good time.
  24. Applause
    seattlebottom reacted to + sniper in " I see nothing wrong with being selective in who he (an escort) accepts as clients "   
    I am turned off by such escorts, but is it fundamentally all that different from a nightclub that doesn't let you in without a certain look?  And realistically, the kind of escort who does that likely isn't going to be a good time in the first place, so they're saving you money.
  25. Like
    seattlebottom reacted to jtwalker in How do you sort your list?   
    When you're searching RM for a hookup, what do you sort by?  What are your must have's and can't stands?
    I sort by most reviews and I am such a nerd that I've developed a scoring system based on appearance, height, position, reviews, smile, description, "intos", photos, face pics and length of time on RM.  I only hire the top 10% total score, because I just don't have that much time.
    Anyone else as crazy organized as me?
×
×
  • Create New...