SirBillybob

Yes.

I stand corrected. I’m not American. I erroneously word-saladed Assistant with SDistrictNY.

Right, palace PR on disclosure discussion: “yeah, but, the butt of butt jokes”. Far greater vulnerability to tasteless comments wrt Farrah Fawcett, even.

The same ADA prosecutor was assigned in April to the case of the fellow charged at that time and ostensibly the person that informed on Smith, assigned a public defender. If she is still prosecuting both cases I assume they are tied together. Just my speculation but if her trial prosecution of Smith were to be strengthened by the sworn testimony of that fellow in which he corroborates the FBI affidavit I would think it all hinges on the ongoing status of that case. Isn’t one implication for that fellow that he potentially self-incriminates by testifying on the stand? Therefore, his plea position is relevant, no? And both defendants seeking downward sentencing variance. I would think that a grand jury indictment step would depend on evidence based on that fellow’s formal sworn testimony before the grand jurors, if indeed the grand jury step allows for witnesses beyond the prosecutorial arguments put forward to that jury. I assume that the grand jury process requires that the prosecution lay out all evidence and all sources of testimony that would occur in trial. If a primary witness is incarcerated his capacity to make it to trial testimony and survive, as a detention abuse target, the duration elapsed is also a factor. He endures the dual labels of pedophile and snitch. With that fellow’s case possibly resting on testimony of those charged and having informed on him early in 2024, systemic gridlock comes to mind as a variable that in part explains delays and continued postponement. A development within any part of the web will inevitably resonate with other web areas.

LA has 45,000 registered listings. I doubt has resources for tracking even the extended proportion. Probably a good idea, though, to make a show of your presence for neighbours when you are there between exiting and arriving guest gaps.

I think that there is a formal notification to adjacent and abutting property owners upon registration as well. Listed all year does not mean the host does not reside in the home from time to time. Anyway the extended privilege dynamics are directly related to what you want to do in terms of how you split up where you reside when. What ratio are you aiming for? Principal residence and its details on drivers licence, IRS, voter registration, etc rests on a combination of presence and intent. I imagine that it’s best if it’s the only property you own in LA. You will likely need a system for retrieving mail or need a PO Box. But it is your prerogative to be away for indefinite periods of time as long as you label and intend to reside in it when you are not elsewhere, whether that be travel or crashing down the road. That said, the extended registration simply supports letting for greater than 120 days and less than or equal to 365 days, as long as it remains categorized as your principal residence, as I understand it. You could be away on a world tour for a year; if the home were not listed it would still be your principal residence. Letting it for rent in such a case would not nullify that status.

Bear in mind that from the same age Elizabeth’s visits to Australia were about 5 years apart, I believe 2000, 2002 (a meeting not a tour), 2006, and 2011. Most folks age 75 would be knocking on wood regarding the next cycle let alone somebody recently treated for non-specific cancer. What I find surprising is that a prostate cancer diagnosis would likely have been disclosed by the firm if it had been so, seeing as it was openly revealed it was being assessed (needle bore biopsy I think). Why play the cards so close on another type? … to avoid tasteless joking perhaps? Anyway, there are more likely suspects than pancreatic; remove prostate from the equation and the probability it is not pancreatic (the pie sliver at 9 o’clock) is about 95%.

My uninformed armchair take: Arrested/charged based on an information or complaint submitted by the prosecutor, in which probable cause is satisfied based on the FBI’s submitted investigative affidavit-type material. Likely held based on societal safety and flight risk. What is postponed to date is a preliminary hearing where the judge determines probable cause OR a grand jury indictment satisfies that step in order to proceed to trial. I don’t think an indictment is always necessitated. Plea bargaining suggests that some degree of culpability is acknowledged with a view to circumventing a trial and jumping to sentencing based on the criminal guilt agreed upon and other mitigating factors such as informant role cooperation.

Also pau25 on Hunqz. Lists as age 31. Not bothering to link as I’m not logged in right now; you can simply Google it. Began high profile porn 2008 so I’d age him up at least 5 years, but that’s OK. I don’t think he’d object to revealing porn name or production outfit, but I’ll refrain. Looks hot in RAI clips.

You may need to comply with a noise level detection device according to the municipality codes.

The 6-month residency can be spread out any way annually (I assume fiscally from your start up) so that allows permanent listing that won’t raise eyebrows, but with 120 days max home sharing on the platform. Interfering looky-lou neighbours will tally the unavailable dates (those with X’s on your availability calendar) and report you if you exceed the 120, but unavailable dates could incorporate that you reside there or don’t want to rent for those periods. Nevertheless you may need to open your books to LA authorities if a complaint is made even if you had technically rented within the 120 max rule. If a guest exceeds a 29-day rental period and you wish to max out rental days beyond 120, I wonder if you can exclude that particular rental from the tally, but be aware that some municipalities are requiring a one-year minimum lease when a one-month let had previously exempted the unit as a home share that requires registration. I don’t think there is a regulation that restricts you from mixing and matching your occupancy, short-term lets on Airbnb, and lastly longer-term lets through the platform that can be excluded from the tally. There is provision to apply and pay about $900 as opposed to basic $90 registration fee for the extended home share prerogative, a short time after you have been established. No home residency requirement for you and allows you to exceed 120 days hosting with no limit. Probably worth it even if you want to let out the residence on Airbnb for less than 120 days. Make sure to check out liability and damages insurance beyond the Airbnb minimum requirement. Try to get a lead on an accountant knowledgeable about what expenditures count as eligible tax deductions from your profit in the home share rental domain. If there’s a pool, check out safety requirements. Read up on guest injury damages claims. In reverse, some hosts require damages deposits. When you are residing there don’t let the bed bugs bite. Those critters don’t class discriminate. Provide ample luggage stands like in hotels. 3-bedroom implies suggested capacity for 6. There will be on average far greater unmonitored traffic than that per rental. https://www.rkmlaw.net/personal-injury/air-bnb-injuries/

Yeah thanks for the earworm.

Ad link?

Yeah I’ve learned a lot of male stripper lessons in some 40 years of going to male strip clubs.

Here is one of several articles deconstructing and debunking the vaccine&cancer myth. You can always search the term “turbo cancer” as well. The few physicians making the claim of a link, and their followers, may have piggy-backed their fake claims on the possibility that cancer screening declined earlier in the pandemic and as a result the trend for patients, vaccinated or not, to be diagnosed at later cancer stages. Vaccines and cancer: The myth that won’t die PUBLICGOODNEWS.COM Over three years of research have found no link between COVID-19 vaccines and cancer. But the myth persists.

What difference does it make really? If respiratory track viral load is reduced due to lower disease severity as a result of vaccination, the array of behavioural factors that predict transmission may still override that one clinical factor of your lower live virus emission quantity into the next person’s system that may have lowered the possibility of transmission in the first place, assuming the sicker one is the more precautions taken to protect others. The lower the disease severity conferred by vaccination the greater the prospect of asymptomatic transmission if absence of symptoms reduced caution. The relevant question is: In the absence of any degree of alteration in CoV transmission potential what would support the decision to forego vaccination? Obviously nothing, because impact on disease severity is inarguable. The bigger question around transmission is: What is the vulnerability to more severe disease of the next person in my circle as a result of their illness severity immunity factors including that conferred by their vaccine uptake status? That explains the applicability and legitimacy of the social contract to do unto others. Fortunately, our own health benefits from the contract. If it were all left to altruism I’d hate to see the outcome. The least one concrete thing one can do is reduce one’s own infection viral burden through vaccination in case it makes a difference. That difference, if it exists at the level of transmission risk, is influenced by behavioural factors, some of which are in our control. In contrast, we cannot control the choices of others but that itself further supports our own vaccine consumption.

Romeo / Hunqz : Visa or Mastercard the only credit cards accepted, as of now anyway

I would have no problem with Rentmen leaving the scene. Hunqz through Romeo Plus works just fine and my last annual fee was 85 Euros. Mastercard, but I see no evidence that they refuse other major card carriers. Many European providers straddle both platforms, as I do as a client, and undertake the burden of cost of two systems simply due to there being these two major sites and FOMO on good matches on either side of the booking equation. Shows up as “Romeo” on statement.

The wet lease in jets always flies better even given the shorter session.

That degree of wisdom suggests 63 and, I might add, it tracks according to aforementioned dynamics.😈

Well, mirror, speak the fuck up. How much off?

What difference does it make how many are riled up? It’s been and will always be that way. You are not wrong, though. However, the live feed revenue exceeds the loss undertaken due to patron reticence about entering as a supporting character in a substandard quasi-porno. The practice also discourages quality dancers that might otherwise be comfortable performing erotically without the risk of Tante Marie-Helene tuning in. Campus disproportionately draws in that component of talent.

I checked card statements and no apparent exchange rate hit at my end. So the platform ratio for me remains at 70:30 for creator-credit to cost-to-tip. For example, my cost is $136 Canadian dollars for the creator to pocket $70 United States dollars. Rethinking my expectations for a brief thanks from creators, inconsistently acknowledged as we all know. LOL. As well as from OF: thanks for contributing to this winter’s Aruba yacht-inclusive corporate retreat fund.

The within-platform payment receipt, knowledge of platform proportional charge of 20% on the base tip amount, the 15% sales tax (in my case delineated as GST) in said receipt, and elementary school-level math. See aforementioned example. In my case I also incur a greater overall charge beyond my illustration as my credit card is not USD and I suppose I pay an exchange rate. Similarly, some of my tips have been sent to creators not dealing in USD currency. The charge to me is in USD and I have to wonder if such creators have their 70% chipped away by exchange rates at their end. I also stopped specifying the tip amount in options message to the creator. I may write simply enjoy a lunch on me. If I say I sent $100 and they see $68-70 in their account I have to wonder what they make of it.