SirBillybob

I think it’s clever so far and these seemingly facile resolutions represent the apparently innocuous calm, sometimes sea receding and exposing more than low tide, prior to a tsunami onslaught. After all, the greatest muting of tension, now that we have a few hours behind us, has occurred with a late-breaking character prior to the gunfire sequence to leave the door open to main character victim identity. Lochlan is gender and sexuality curious, including intersex, an observer. Other references to gender fluidity and stratification have occurred. He’s the most interesting character not because of the reductionist view of homosexual potential (he could eradicate Saxon’s bravado demeanour with a look and send him on a cliché mission while raising overly simplistic audience assumptions about MSM lust) but because he can subtly and manipulatively disarm both siblings while on the face of it having conflict imposed on him wrt choosing an alliance with one or the other. He can point-blank cross a line with impunity staring down his naked brother even following cues to cease and desist, then asking his sister about her virginity. Piper cannot meet the challenge of resenting both brothers equally although Lochlan broke a confidence while also acting as conduit for his brother's intrusiveness. He can do temple and pool, generate sexual topic anxiety either saying nothing or pushing the envelope, while exacerbating the tension between older sibs. This deflects from familial pressures to choose the Alma Mater of two female members vs two male members. He sits between the two gender ambiguous staff about whom he had asked his father a sex ed question, that cloak his mother in her dream … protection forecasting? The first Ep3 line is his “this is what it looks like before a tsunami”. On his device he comments on a tsunami victim paralytically frozen in place. Lochlan is pressured to have sex before he dies because it will assuage Saxon’s anxiety about his brother’s ambiguity. He never affirms the goal, rattling Saxon’s faux alpha confidence. Saxon's sense of self, of validation, hinges on a mini-me fantasy. Chelsea is a survivor and man eater, two brushes with mortality but she holds the cards interactionally, taming Rick, as Tonya held them financially while treated poorly, and her demise would be too repetitive. Where death offers the greatest resolution systemically, other than the more obvious usual suspects’ “just desserts”, is Lochlan croaking because it solves a pathological bind. It needn’t be intentional malicious targeting. It would be divisive because not everybody will view him having reached a shit-disturbing behavioural threshold, and his coping style is a function of cray-cray family dynamics. He superficially does what’s expected but there’s a price for consuming a protein drink in just the right way and without slouching, and it may be his family enduring his eradication while never having recognized he both provocatively heats up and balances the system. This might mean Tim will have wiggled out of his business crisis. The three women mirror disorganized alliance dynamics but cancel each other out as demise candidates and can go separate ways, whereas families are bound. Lochlan’s triangulation is more profound. The lily pad pond is his tranquillity tank.

At least we now know why Sandra Bernhard has been trapped for decades in a white lab coat.

I’m hooked merely reading the first two Preface paragraphs in a sample.

She could hardly bite his head off.

Didn’t at all see that ending coming because he had mostly along his lengthy writing trajectory steered away from that particular kind of backdrop.

Also recently in The Buccaneers. My grievous fault. Move over Galitzine and Woodall.

And most businesses providing resources and services have been traditionally found via some version of walking fingers. Both individuals and collectives are often their own promotional products.

What distinguishes OnlyFans from any other PPV erotica platform? Nothing really. At LPSG any interest in profiles usually devolves to begging to see visual content another member paid for. Such content on LPSG is mostly under subscription paywall so I wonder if there is a kickback deal with OF. Although Rentmen is also subject to the DMCA, images entered here simply reinforce traffic to ads and are mainly presented as links that RM supports thru URL. Nobody is saving $ by sharing. In contrast, I would expect a greater quantity of copyright infringement complaints from OF content creators beyond reviews and commentary on our board restricted to text format. This might be an example where best to redact a specific OF handle in a topic title.

A long way from her 1993 single line as Granny/Auntie Catherine Mingott’s upper middle age maid I barely caught yesterday rewatching The Age of Innocence, not peaking yet but got a cast credit.

It’s essential but unfortunately the next pit stop in the legitimacy chain tends to be the problematic Nordic model. Where in that film was the punter constituency not demonized, with central creepskie the antithesis of an officer and gentleman?

No Faustian bargain with cherry-picked rigidity.

This reminds me to rigorously slap myself in the face whenever harbouring rescue-from-occupation theme fantasies with respect to escorts with whom I’d unrealistically wish to be romantically entangled. 😉

Good grief. Besides which “product of a union” is not an idiom, the topic heading merely colloquially referenced a circumscribed collective entity and the intent was empathic attunement regarding hazards. A neutral term, not unlike for example, “How challenging it can be to select from the inventory of outstanding chaps here in the bro-thel today”, the context not geared to disrespect or to undermining dignity. Sure, you could substitute “array” for “inventory” so as not to step on fragile eggs. You could also say “lineup” and unearth somewhere a virtue-signalling objector. Sheesh. Labelling me a “punter” could be derogatory in some people’s eyes, I suppose, but in my view I’m a punter generically before I’m a client specifically. Either term could put me in harm’s way depending on context.

And that blank facial expression you get if you inquire as to whether the non-forthcumming ejaculatory product is due to erectile reliability refractory periods, not having requested or been offered the cum lottery entry that day, or not winning a $ bidding war. To save his face in such a precarious situation, best not to ask. Funny thing is, I’m only asking if, not why, in order to prepare, as I don’t up-pay or down-pay based on his orgasm.

I am a person that is the product of my parents’ union.

Anybody that didn’t compromise license.

If he debriefed with you it opened the possibility of covering and reviewing ways to mitigate risk, including strategies in which you’d have no concrete role. It would be impractical to be his behind-scenes wingman documenting his date details in the same way that anyone would share data with a trusted person before meeting a stranger in private, or to be his bodyguard. Absent a prurient motive, such magnanimity could get very tired very quickly. Financial compensation commensurate with occupational risk is baked into fees and he has the prerogative to rest on those earnings while bypassing any typical 🚩 sitch.

Zero extra. If they wanted to remain and I didn’t insist on paying the negotiated short-time fee for them to leave prior to bedtime, then they were welcome to stay for breakfast.

If the escort knows full well the implications of not enabling new prospective clients to reach out he may be wanting previous clients that already possess a means of contact to know that he remains in circulation. A version of a break. It’s not uncommon for me to check the status of a listing prior to trying to book a repeat through WhatsApp, &c. If there are reviews one may also try to reach out to a reviewer on the platform for info although I realize that may be onerous and without yield.

That would require true grit and might be unforgiven. Besides, the current season already forecasts a gunfight.

I think that collaboration as a term, as jargon, neutralizes intent that could be judged as inappropriate or bending the specific rules of a platform. I see it in the OF context as referring to content creators conjoining in some way. In the IG context it seems broader, brand affiliation, eg, clothing, gym supplements poster boy sponsorship, “DM for collab” … usually desexualized, but erotic material in an OF account where the holder has explicitly linked their IG account opens the door to more openly risky IG messaging because IG (and X) are not monetized up front in the same way as OF but could offer a springboard for trade earnings. Some OF creators are also registering PayPal in their overarching platform list, some degrees of separation from their OF, a Linktree listing for example, although it conceivably deprives OF of the standard 20% tip cut and may add an additional mode of communication about money.

That’s how I see it, other creators. I wouldn’t reach out for collab on OF if I wanted to hook up but I would look for indicators of Instagram, less so X because messaging on X seems more complicated, and I would try messaging on IG without censorship, including my phone contact. Once on WhatsApp the seduction moves up a notch. His Instagram account is also unlikely mediated by a broker, middleman, or, as you say, chatterer, what have you. I assume IF you wanted to TRY to write your phone # on OF and get away with that you would delineate it as five five five, &c.

Uuuuuhaaaaahooooohaaaaawmbia.

There needs to be a hook that moves you from being a complete unknown to somebody worth communicating with, not simply “I’m from Europe, and I want to begin engaging in a prostitution arrangement while having offered no additional $tat$.” So, an Instagram page of your own that they will see, along with messaging using that platform, that captures interest in your resources and other features that may be essential to an entity that likely picks and chooses assignments. Or “I’m so-and-so and I hope you treated yourself to a great outing using the $250 tip I sent on d/m/yr.” Where I’ve been successful there had been a context of self-revelation that broke the ice. What could be simpler? You want one single thing and he wants a different single thing.