SirBillybob

Why thanks 😊 but could you provide a Thesaurus for translation by any chance? What it might not clarify given your little side word salad, however, is that propensity by definition is static. The qualifier works semantically, for example courtesy of one of your photo subjects whose privacy was rudely invaded, if I were to say you have an occasional capacity to make a bit of sense. 😘

So I live a few blocks from Atetekan and Ste-Catherine and had a week’s break from the cottage, primarily for commitments and Olympics viewing. The zenith of Pride Weekend today was fun, cooperative weather, although some may know torrential rains almost shut down the city Friday along with power outages. l had occasion to attend Bar Stock and Bar Campus frequently. They were both worth it. I saw no evidence of any female customer example reflected similar to an earlier illustrative intent by another poster. I value inclusivity but also note the diversity in people types that makes life interesting. I had taken that entry as an inflammatory dig to body shame somebody that had dropped in to the club to enjoy a drink and socializing. There were many seats over the substantial space occupied by patrons where the customer might not have stood out as much. Random or bitchy photo choice? You be the judge. Visual hyperbole for the sake of showing off is tiresomely manipulative. I might add that the same poster also inserted slick illustrative representations of the club he seemed out to malign. He had also provided a photograph populated by men having a good time viewing a cute dancer. In a situation like this I typically say “Pick a lane.” A picture says a thousands words and inserting an array of contradictory photo takes is simply absurd and time-wasting. All strip clubs have their ups and downs. I don’t favour any one in particular so my summation is that the potential to enjoy your time in Campus or Stock is certainly there. It takes a village in The Village. If this topic had not been initiated the opportunity for a balanced and objective overview might not have occurred. So all are welcome. If a club visit makes you unhappy and you want to Yelp about it that’s OK too. The city has a lot of lucrative tourism going. One frustrated private dance seeker doesn’t make or break the scene. The dancers prefer local men and women over from-away drop-ins for repeat event earning reasons, understandably, but will be hospitable to anybody that knows how to behave and keep trash talk from spouting from their pie-holes (here we call it poutine-holes). I had an off-putting run-in with an unwell person in an otherwise empty MARTA station this Spring of an early dawn while minding my own business with suitcase ready to hop on a train to the airport. One unwell person does not represent the whole.

AFAIK none with on-site private dance structure.

With that Québécois penis nudging against your uvula he realizes and accepts that you have to place your hands somewhere.

Doesn’t fit on the licence plate, but “Eh bien je me souviens que je viens entre les reins des reines.”

More than one is usually discreet.

In contrast to oral finasteride where sexual function change findings lean towards a conclusion of detrimental side effect for some patients, topical finasteride (the OP’s written not oral topic) compared to topical placebo studied in research to date based on most recent available systematic review does not convincingly impact sexual function. Endocrine factors explain the academic receipts difference between oral and topical. Interestingly, some degree of both improved hair growth and deterioration in sexual function has been reported for placebo study arms, the two factors depending on oral vs topical product methodology. Finasteride assignment arm hair growth is usually a multiple of placebo arm hair growth because the latter group’s is not nil. Anecdotal reports of decreased sexual function among men using topical finasteride would be considered an artefact effect of unrelated variables affecting sexual function. Human nature goes for a concrete explanation, however specious. Science-based assumptions of causality not met satisfactorily. Due to unique sexual function demands a provider would not be deemed the most favourable candidate for assessing the effects referenced above.

Your question relates to the existence, application, enforcement, or breach of regulations that is irrelevant to the discussion about Montreal strip clubs because the venues’ acceptance of all genders is of their own volition and the venues do not pander or capitulate to the handful of objectors to ‘all walks of life’ inclusiveness. A double standard must contain a contradiction, like one party has the privilege of gaslighting the other but not vice versa.

Gay Pride, and a parade if there is one, culminates in a weekend … next weekend. Why should a club accommodate anyone’s arbitrary expectations according to specific dates anyway? Naturally, however, a commercial establishment’s marketing around key seasonal events is designed to upregulate interest. Irony: the expression of one’s meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite. Example, somebody regularly attending Gay Pride lacking awareness of its typical 10-day structure. Or my single lifetime weekend visit to Atlanta this year qualifying a blanket impression about that scene that shouldn’t be taken with a grain of salt; of course it doesn’t, and I had the worst time ever, hookups so very inhospitable. 😉 The number of male customers in a photo that represents a few square feet in a large complex appears to be nil, that is so in this isolated case. As I said, it does and did not represent the ratio of men and women across the entire weekend’s evening span. Fake can be manipulation and reaching for influencer status exceeding grasp, with selective bias, not necessarily outright mendacity. Obviously, a photo such as the one posted is what the lens captured and is not doctored. It does not make it the penultimate receipt to defend a claim of steady female encroachment, Bridezilla theme notwithstanding. I similarly witnessed a gaggle of females there with flower wreaths in their hair this weekend. It was not problematic and my inclination to adjust my panties behind the curtain far exceeded that of getting them in a knot. Nor did a measured assessment of the scene lead to their ignition. The next time that you are in Stock or Campus I suggest hearing from the staff’s point of view the policy on taking photos in a strip club. You can always stomp your feet and assert it is your prerogative. That should go over well.

Could be intersected with It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia as it is renewed for at least two more seasons and has an exec producer in common as well as I believe an Abbott producer that is a IASIP actor. Frank height jokes for Ava?

Sure, because civil rights law in Canada requires a club such as Campus to write on their website “we cater to men but women are welcome”. /s

That’s right, you don’t, and they have thought it through and don’t require advice. But nothing to stop you from grousing on their X feeds.

I’m not a huge fan of Stock and don’t attend often but this post is fake news. First of all, gay pride week in Montreal has not yet occurred. Second, there were far more male customers last night (Sat) than women. The booths are far more private and comfortable than the other venue options. I had originally paid entry to Campus but too crowded to comfortably cross from one area to another. Consistently jostled, primarily by groups of males that like to stand in cliques and refuse to move closer to the perimeter to enable passage. So I left to order a drink at Stock instead. Sure, Campus has more dancers but if you think of the two as a combo mere steps from each other you are likely to find what you want. Last night, that find happened to be at Stock, where I also got the skinny on the Barcelona strip concept from a hot Caribbean chap guest dancing over here. Campus is evolving to a place where I obtain phone numbers for dancer hookups at home, fellows that don’t want to use ad sites and can vet clientele in person.

Info extracted.

Saliva is not your anti-bacterialSTI friend. Spit is both implicated in gonorrhea transmission and does not convincingly inhibit gonorrhea making touchdown or contained within it. The OP only either benefits from episodic post-fellatio mouthwash use or doesn’t.

I would want mine sober when drilling and pulling out.

Scandinavia must have annexed a vast Nordic area.

Isn’t that the past tense, and for prospective encounters “I’d love to collaboreat” your ass”?

Sure, but then list urine among your shower supplies for washing up and gargling. It’s mint but economical. And saves time if it’s both the during and the after.

No. The stripper world only has so many available pseudonyms. Charles 2.0 attends the same gym as me. No resemblance even.

Poured ahead into a disposable cup near you.

So we’ve heard, various versions.

I hope everybody is alerting their apparently cock-sucking grandpa.

You are right; it is subjective. Each person must decide their threshold of concern according to rates per person-years. We should take rising incidence rates along with antimicrobial resistance in stride, and these apply to the entire sexually active population. Population rates do govern personal prophylaxis decision-making. Show me media articles that do not routinely use ‘on the rise’ language. That said, gonorrhea rates are considerably higher compared to other STI. For me, the lowest common denominator for aggregate STI protection decision-making is the STI with the highest and most increasing rate in tandem with AMR developments. When I gargled following receptive oral, GC was front of mind. Recently, I began using condoms but I’ve never found condoms as impeding as offers understandably do.