SirBillybob

King Charles will undergo a common surgical procedure, requiring hospitalization, for benign prostatic hyperplasia. It is deemed to be a non-malignant condition in his case. One does not necessarily require a prostate in-bore biopsy aimed at ruling out cancer in order to undergo an elective in-office or hospital-based procedure to alleviate the symptoms of enlarged prostate, but it is conceivable such a diagnostic procedure had previously occurred. This week’s procedure is likely not a radical prostatectomy.

Nobody older than 40 would be caught dead in mine, or alive.

You had me at Kia. I shall forward my St Lawrence Seaway port address posthaste. It is not in my signature.

What gave it away, that the art over the couch likely intending the phrase ‘do what makes you happy’ now reads ‘do wv eis makes you happy’?

But he’s my ticket to the sperm bank of a bleak wintery morning. Pardon the hardon.

In such cases my tip would be automatically larger yet further away.

I give to get; they’ll get what they see. The laxity of escorts’ screening never ceases to amaze. I find that most Grindr images sent directly thru chat are spread cheeks not subject to facial recognition or reputation-doxxing risk, so I don’t quite grasp the comparison to Rentmen reference.

The 12 months following a wet market of actual consequence? I think it’s related to some wet market aspect.

Or, rather, have an effect because a similar outcome may occur with or without drug intervention, especially given that providers taking PDE5 inhibitors do not mirror the clinical ED of drug trial subjects. And/or the uncertainty about having not taken placebo but per chance having taking drug paradoxically upticks erection robustness among those double-blinded to placebo. It’s all in the penis because the head second-guesses or the head may be unrelated to cue-based autonomous physiological drivers of tumescence that work in concert with the psychological. My example is a scenario that does not occur because actually sneaking somebody a sugar pill masquerading as drug is fraught with ethical considerations, the idea set up aimed at further underscoring what some others are saying. ….. Yes, correct inflation analogy at the physiological level. PDE5 inhibitors are not directly vasodilating in the same way as, say, Trimix. They block the natural and essential process of erection neutralization. ——— These points are simply to say that expanding an exploration of clinical concepts with that subset of persons bent out of shape in some way may mitigate the assumptions held that they are the root cause of the need and decision that drug be employed by the partner. The introduction of drug in this context is often compartmentalized and akin to the proverbial pea beneath the mattress, considerations that providers’ arousal may be partly due, in fact, to the client’s presence negated in the limited mentalizing about it. Again, as others have pointed out with sometimes an added emphasis on providers’ autonomy. The idea that it is the provider’s prerogative to consume the drug will not on its own help some clients get out of their own way regarding the narcissistic injury that plagues them. Deconstructing assumptions in a tailor made fashion, obviously not reduced to a few paragraphs’ clinically oriented language, is the order of the day. That said, you yourself seem capable of grasping the more complex. First hand knowledge of this tends to ensue from service provision to hundreds of sex therapy couples presenting with arousal concerns and associated dynamics. One is up against the overgeneralization shoved down people’s throats that the penis is the predominant or exclusive marker of ‘his just being or not into you’.

Feeling poorly would be both futile and inaccurate. The scenario is not binary wherein any possible degree of erection relies on drug uptake. PDE5I trials’ placebo has a clinically and statistically significant effect. If, hypothetically, he took a sugar pill that you both thought was drug and a satisfactory erection outcome occurred, he would incorrectly believe it was due to needing a drug and he would correctly believe that it worked as a result of expectations about the outcome of taking it, albeit none the wiser. You would incorrectly believe something worked because it was biologically and contextually needed, nullifying the potential of perceived reality that you were far less the cause of a need about which you shouldn’t have been concerned in the first place.

Seems to be QUARTERBACK_XL in Singapore, or Bangkok this week. Country codes Switzerland and Belgium. Daddy be a Santa’s little helper?

Not FBI, not CIA, but this chap attempting to seduce Paulski was a hoot.

A rough break, to be sure. Best wishes for a complete and speedy recovery from disseminated GC infection. That complications, for example, for women may include pelvic inflammatory disease culminating in infertility supports the ideas above that such diseases transcend orientation, gender, etc. Whereas young people are often failed in terms of prevention and surveillance education, it’s unfortunate that you have had to do your part filling in some of the gaps, but it is valuable and appreciated.

Absofuckinglutely!

I thought maybe Prep X is the Baileys Irish Cream?

And another altogether different something is the provider apparently explicitly pointing out this overstatement neutrally, or worse, insultingly.

You do cowboy shoots. You do cowboy shoots. You do cowboy shoots.

If I’m long in tooth with more robust penile tumescence than the run of mill porn actor whose erectile manifestation is circumscribed within curated vid clips, then being termed centenarian, Methuselah, what have you, is water off my back. Not to mention that such a put-down attempt is, well, bizarre and lacking in creativity. Curious as hell, though, as to what third-party insult content would be restricted here.

There is a lot on offer, for sure. (No need for posters to summarize options, as they are clear) However, does the type of facility you described, very upscale seeming, exist currently? Me jelly.

I have related to the occasional ad manually.

I see this as an unforced error on the part of the provider if, as some have suggested, the platform clock hasn’t automatically run out 4 times since registration and the single review of Dec 2019. Whether flagging the apparent mistake is frivolous is not my call as it may make the day for one or more. I wouldn’t attempt to act contrary to the bold force of the original object.

May we all have a similarly great portfolio in our hands.

Some would add Superpowers to the list but in your case that jig is up.

I went about 10 years ignorant of what eligible expenses I was missing out on claiming, but then had a good tax accountant for two decades. She got me extremely organized and we only met annually for about an hour at tax season, billing me only for that time.

Tee hee, of course the tattless antiquity aspect was not lost on me. That said, in a pinch I’ll accept first or second hand.