Jump to content

pubic_assistance

Members
  • Posts

    10,381
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    pubic_assistance got a reaction from Pillowtalk in 411 on Theonlytomforyou - in NYC   
    Well he looked damn good in 2018. Great body. I love a good six pak.
  2. Thanks
    pubic_assistance reacted to Dchotasianguy in 411 on Theonlytomforyou - in NYC   
    Btw, he did a few videos on Sean Cody as Jaymus.  
    https://www.eporner.com/video-wrazxk8NiIl/jayce-jaymus-bareback/
    https://thegay.com/videos/1113277/jaymus-jack-bareback/
    https://gay0day.com/videos/1782/bareback-jaymus-robbie/
     
     
     
  3. Applause
    pubic_assistance got a reaction from TJMS in Question for clients: using a second phone?   
    Exactly. 
    Everything gets interconnected now.
    If anyone has privacy concerns of any kind its lost when you give a provider your primary mobile number. I have META making friends suggestions of people I fucked YEARS ago. Obviously they receive the same...and therefore have my social media contacts. Any sense of anonymity that I may have wanted is gone. 
  4. Agree
    pubic_assistance reacted to + azdr0710 in Luke_Muscle in NYC   
    well, you gotta hand it to RM for at least making an attempt to try to appear to verify authentic reviews(!)......otherwise, any jilted boyfriend could submit a phony review, right??!!   😏 
  5. Thanks
    pubic_assistance reacted to PileDriver in Kiddo in NYC   
    Kiddo is one of the few true gifts to nyc hiring culture...great man...total voracious pleasure
  6. Thanks
    pubic_assistance reacted to TBD in Kiddo in NYC   
    you can not go wrong with Kiddo. He does have a career outside of this, so that can impact the immediacy of his replies - however there is a reason why he is still so popular. 
     
    The man is fantastic. 
  7. Agree
    pubic_assistance got a reaction from + JamesB in Question for clients: using a second phone?   
    Exactly. 
    Everything gets interconnected now.
    If anyone has privacy concerns of any kind its lost when you give a provider your primary mobile number. I have META making friends suggestions of people I fucked YEARS ago. Obviously they receive the same...and therefore have my social media contacts. Any sense of anonymity that I may have wanted is gone. 
  8. Agree
    pubic_assistance reacted to ericwinters in NYC Airports   
    Skip the $100+ car ride and the crawl through traffic. JFK’s AirTrain takes you straight to Jamaica Station, where you can hop on the Long Island Railroad or the subway. Even traveling heavy—with my big checked bag and backpack—I’ve done this multiple times without a single issue.

    It's usually about 40 minutes and under $30 to get right into Penn Station and Moynihan Train Hall, with one transfer at Jamaica. Faster, cheaper, and way less stressful than sitting in a car watching the meter climb. I've done this 3 times since my original ask last year.
     
  9. Agree
    pubic_assistance reacted to mike carey in NYC Airports   
    The LIRR from Jamaica station to Penn Station is pretty much the same as the NJ Transit train from EWR. Certainly not the workout of taking the subway. I travel with one suitcase, so I can't speak for the decision process with more than one. Or for options other than the train.
  10. Thanks
    pubic_assistance reacted to MikeBiDude in Question for clients: using a second phone?   
    I know if I google my personal cell number ALL sorts of info pops up about me. If I google my BurnerApp number zero comes up, including on Mr. Number. FYI no hits on Mr. Number on my personal number either.
  11. Thanks
    pubic_assistance reacted to Pd1_jap in Question for clients: using a second phone?   
    They usually threaten to go to the police and send the messages to my friends and family. Both are bluffs. They won't go to the police because they are also breaking the law. 
    I am an out gay man in an open relationship but I still don't want everyone to know I hire escorts. The burner number prevents this because it can't be traced back to me.
  12. Thanks
    pubic_assistance reacted to + KensingtonHomo in Question for clients: using a second phone?   
    Whatever your comfort level is - is fine. I feel like if you're an out gay person, either single or have an understanding with your partner, and don't have a job where some random person claiming your hired them for sex would get you fired - using your own phone is fine. 
    I do use the Burner app because I don't want my phone number getting out there. But once someone is a regular, I'll use my actual phone number. 
  13. Thanks
    pubic_assistance reacted to Pd1_jap in Question for clients: using a second phone?   
    https://www.burnerapp.com
    The app can be glitchy but it's the best for privacy. 
    The 4.99 monthly subscription allows you to have one burner number that you can "burn" (cancel the number) and get another number easily for no extra charge. 
    I've had a couple times where a provider/scammer tries to black mail me. When that happens I just burn the number and get a new one. 
  14. Confused
    pubic_assistance reacted to theplayerking in Bareback   
    Absolutely, but I would say even more so from the top. For the bottom, there’s much less friction, and it feels a lot better. Then, of course, this is the psychological thrill of taking a man’s cum inside your body.
  15. Hide Eyes
    pubic_assistance reacted to Wings246 in Bareback   
    I can attest to this with my personal experiences.  A provider who was listed as "Safe Only" was BB during my entire encounter with him.  Neither one of us mentioned/suggested/requested/asked about the use of condom before, during, or after.
  16. Surprised
    pubic_assistance reacted to + Pensant in Bareback   
    Even those who proclaim “safe only” have been known to go bare with little prompting, a little birdie told me.
  17. Applause
    pubic_assistance reacted to DMonDude in Bareback   
    Plenty of escorts do just fine financially without barebacking. It's not the necessity in the experience you think it is. Also just because Escorts work to fulfill a clients fantasies doesn't mean they are obligated to cater to all fantasies. They have it in their control to not take on certain risks if they choose not to.
  18. Confused
    pubic_assistance reacted to sky in Bareback   
    I feel if escorts didn't allow bareback as a bottom they would be limiting what they can make.  Whether or not they are on prep is their choice but the job of the escort is to offer the client a "fantasy".  For many clients that might mean an escort that is willing to bareback as part of the experience.  I also feel that escorts should set their rate and shouldn't charge extra.  Is there a risk the escort faces barebacking?  Yes, but they have it in their control to help minimize the risk.  
  19. Agree
    pubic_assistance reacted to Heart It Deep in Bareback   
    Most studios require testing shortly before filming (apx 48 hours) to clear to shoot.  Sometimes your scene partner changes the day before because the original one tested+ for something and needed treatment.  
     
    I've noticed outside the U.S. in general people are much better about condom usage.  Just my lived experience.  
  20. Hide Eyes
    pubic_assistance reacted to Thomas_Belgium in Bareback   
    They still exist. You can find them on gay sex date apps.
  21. Agree
    pubic_assistance reacted to + Just Chuck in What we look like - Why does it matter so much now?   
    I think there’s more than one motivation to ask for the face pic.  I’ve met trans men and women and also physically smaller providers who’ve told me that they do that for safety.  Although, I’m not sure if they’d know if it’s a fake photo.
    I think the bigger percentage of providers who ask for a photo are indeed screening to see if the client isn’t too much of a turn off for them.  I’m guessing they are not providers as a full time source of income.  I’ve met college students and people with full-time day jobs who take on some extra gig jobs but only when they sound appealing enough.
  22. Haha
    pubic_assistance reacted to Nue2thegame in What we look like - Why does it matter so much now?   
    I share your pain. I had one who told me that I have the biggest cock he’s ever seen but I’m pretty sure he says that to everybody. 
  23. Haha
    pubic_assistance reacted to maninsoma in What we look like - Why does it matter so much now?   
    Well, if a provider wants to have the equivalent of a dress code then he should just spell that out in his ad, e.g., you must be under 40 and have a BMI under 25.  It shouldn't be "send me your photo and I'll tell you if you qualify."  That would be like a restaurant telling patrons they must submit a photo of themselves dressed in the attire they plan to wear, and then the restaurant deciding whether it meets their standards which haven't been spelled out in advance.  Restaurants that have dress codes typically spell them out quite clearly, e.g., men must wear coat and tie, and take the risk that a diner will have horrible taste and show up in a 1970s leisure suit.
  24. Agree
    pubic_assistance reacted to acks0104 in What we look like - Why does it matter so much now?   
    It's not implying that booking a session means it'll be a good one. It's stating that if they were to just let you book anyway you'd probably have a bad session. 
    No one likes being rejected, but I'd rather be rejected than pay for an escort who can't or won't deliver on a decent session because he's not into me 
  25. Thanks
    pubic_assistance reacted to Austin Lewis in What we look like - Why does it matter so much now?   
    The one time I had a provider ask for something like this (a video chat on WhatsApp), my heart sank. I'm not much to look at, and I don't exactly make up for it with overwhelming charm. But he was incredibly hot, so I gave it a shot. Whatever it was he was looking for, I guess he got it, since we met and have continued to meet whenever he's in my area.
×
×
  • Create New...