pubic_assistance

This photo reminds me of how I miss the old days of Abercrombie and Hollister. When dozens of incredibly handsome male models would walk around the store wearing pants too big like this fellow is wearing. You could see their V shaped lower torso as it descended into hairy pubes and get a peek at the upper crack of their delicious ass. Its a pity that whole thing came crashing down. Was always fun to fantasize that the boys were for sale too. (Although THAT is exactly what brought down Mike Jeffries). 😢

Back when I was doing muay-thai kickboxing, ( pre-Covid) I was seriously in need of REAL therapeutic massage. So finding a skilled professional for me was never "sad". But finding one who's handsome, muscular and masculine but ONLY offers therapy, would, indeed be mighty frustrating.

Although I agree, the man is handsome for sure. His professional space screams "doctors office" ...so unless you have a med-fetish there is nothing remotely sensual about that environment. I am going to guess he's a strictly therapeutic provider. Nothing wrong with that. But he's sending strong messages to let us know, not to bother asking for more.

Well...trusting a pharmaceutical company is like trusting a door-to-door salesman. Of course you "need" what they're selling. 🙄So although, I am not an anti-vaxxer, I also am not quick to just assume that what someone is selling is what I NEED to do. One of my best friends is the CFO of a pharmaceutical company. I have hear many stories of how turning a profit is more important than actually healing the sick. Lots of research fails at the animal model, but they observe side effects and then just market the drug as a cure for something else. The industry is a lot more sloppy and unethical than what people want to believe. So...distrusting all vaccines is stupid, for sure. Distrusting the industry is NOT as wacko as some would make it out to be simply because they don't like the messenger.

I've seen both. Swollen clitoris with vaginas still intact. And a metoidioplastiy modification with the vagina sewed shut. BOTH are unappealing. I cant imagine why anyone would want either one. Metoidioplasty: This masculinizing genital affirming procedure builds upon the existing growth of the clitoris after prior testosterone hormone therapy. In this procedure, the surrounding tissue of the enlarged clitoris is released and removed to achieve maximal length and a more natural-looking male aesthetic. A urethra can also be reconstructed using either local skin tissue or a graft from the mouth depending on the amount of tissue present and is usually combined with a vaginectomy. The result is an aesthetic, small penis with ability to void from the tip. Construction of a scrotum with testicular prosthetics can also be performed at the same time. Should it be desired, removal of the uterus, vagina and/or ovaries can be performed at the same time.

It is definitely the prep work that gives me pause to want to follow through with booking a top. I would never feel comfortable showing up "unprepared". (Although I'm sure I must have done that when I was younger). I would be horrified if I were not 100% ready and there was an "accident". As far as being bi...certainly topping is more in my wheelhouse...but bottoming is still a desire for variety from the usual. I do think its a LOT more work to get ready to bottom. I can top at a moment's notice.

Am I the only person who HATES that "feather touch" thing ? Feels like spiders crawling on me.

Agreed. I always provide my basic stats along with a simple face/torso photo (wearing a t shirt). no nudity. I'm not trying to attract a Grindr hook up.

The point is: there IS already enough reason to be concerned based on the Mount Sinai report. So ignoring valid data because you dont like the messenger is beyond stupid. Better safe than sorry. Pharmaceutical companies always do their best to bury any negative side effects of their profitable products.

Correlation is not necessarily causation. But...it does give reason to be concerned enough to NOT jump to conclusions until additional research is done. There is a little more here than juat a "conspiracy theory" by the HHS secretary. Mount Sinai Study Supports Evidence That Prenatal Acetaminophen Use May Be Linked to Increased Risk of Autism and ADHD | Mount Sinai - New York https://share.google/vNc965W9SbwKklGxd

Haven't seen him since before Covid. His RentMasseur profile states he is a new parent. So sounds like he had some family time during his years away.

No face pix but one photo shows a dark hair mustache. So...questioning the validity of the photos paired with a blond/blue moniker when I already see brunette facial hair on the photos provided.

OK.....and..... Still off topic. The discussion is about flakes. Most recently about glamor boys who are too good to be bothered. I know you dont have any experience with gorgeous men...so tell us about the ordinary looking men you prefer to shag. Did any of them flake on you ?

Why ? Actors act. You don't need to be a magician to play a magician. Plenty of British actors know how to do an authentic American accent.

Seems like a deli price. Hes looking good in those new pix.

Yet you dont. What does any of this have to do with flakes ?

I remember seeing this picture of him when he was young. Kinda cute in a nerdy way.

What's your opinion about flakes ?

To a DEGREE. Yes. But there is also a very established RANGE of what people MOST consider LESSER and what MOST people consider BETTER. It's not just about MY tastes. Anyway the thread is about FLAKES, and not about paying good money for boring guys without a six pak. I think the point was started that some of the most beautiful men available on Rent.men are as flaky as the gentlemen who pretend to want to hire them.

Well I personally don't subscribe to the "I will fuck anything that moves" viewpoint, but I am aware that plenty of people's standards are appropriately low because they shop where they can afford to shop. But to me, if you're PAYING good money, you shouldn't be buying week old hamburger. Go for the Prime Rib. Women don't "prefer" old-dad-bod unless old-dad has a thick wallet. Back to the subject of flakes...there are always plenty of Instagram types who make plenty of money from their ONLYFANS account. I see no reason why they would even bother escorting, if they aren't going to provide a superior experience. I DO agree with you. Better to go with the more ordinary looking guy who goes out of his way to suck your dick than hire some beauty queen with attitude. Just saying, I personally don't see the point of PAYING for "ordinary". Lots of damn good looking guys who ARE good at what they do. Just might take a little more time navigating and sorting through the losers.

🙄 Some people swear that McDonalds is their favorite restaurant too. To each his own. But I do agree that looks ALONE do not a good escort, make. When I PAY for company, I want QUALITY. That means a balance between superior looks and personality. I always say, the hottest guy I ever had sex with was also the worst lay I ever had. So nice abs and a nice personality trumps a ripped-as-all-hell asshole.

Try clearing your cache. A quick Google search will tell you how to do that if you dont know.

Not "straight" here...but this is how it is for me and my wife. We are both bisexual and have an understanding that extra curricular same-sex activity allows us to satisfy our diverse sexual interests but engaging in outside heterosexual activity would feel like "cheating". I realize this sounds a little fucked up, and maybe the logic is difficult to understand but we BOTH feel strongly about the matter. And we both (to the best of my knowledge) have always respected that agreement since we married 20 years ago.

I am honestly baffled that this is confusing to people. Especially gay men. How is it that so few people here understand that lots of straight men dabble in homosexual activity ? Or is it that you guys are still believing that old trope, "once you suck a dick you're gay" ? To @Gilfson 's point...yes technically bisexual. But there are millions of men who are functionally bisexual, but ONLY identify as straight. So obviously THAT is who @Fridolf is talking about. I remember when I was in Istanbul. Loads of really handsome young macho guys out at night, cuddling with their ( obviously ) gay friend. I was intrigued by the whole scene and surprised there were SO many handsome "gay" men in Istanbul. I was staying at a bed & breakfast owned by a young and very "hip" couple...and I brought up the subject during a chat with them about the diversity of the city. They smiled and said "AH...that !" They went on to explain that in their culture it is very important for men to marry a virgin. But that this has become a problem in modern Istanbul, because many women are wanting to attend college and even start a career before marriage. This presents a problem for all the young ( horny ) men. So it is common for those handsome macho men to take-on a gay male companion, for whom they offer protection from harassment in exchange for sex. The fascinating thing is that the effeminate guy is "gay" and being harassed for it, while the macho guy is "straight" because he is masculine, defensive of his companion and sexually dominant. I think this was the most obvious example of the sub culture of straight men engaging in frequent homosexual activity, that I've run across in my travels. The social construct is that dominant men are straight, and passive men are gay.

Would be interesting to hear from some providers who do actually understand the issue of "straight men' hiring.