pubic_assistance

It is NOT. That is definitely something you need to request and I would recommend you include a photo of yourself when you make that request.

OK KAREN Let it go. You're hogging the conversation with your drama.

I don't care about seeing full frontal nudity. I will glady take any opportunity to see Regé-Jean Page naked from any angle. Absolutely gorgeous man.

I quote: . "I have not had experience with a trans man before and have always wondered what it was like. " THIS is the sentence I am responding to. The gentleman asked what it was like and I shared my experience and my opinion. Now....let's drop the overly prescious righteous indignation and get back to the subject. Which would be whether or not someone has #1 met Santos or #2 been with a trans male

All comments should be understood in context. So far I am the single member of this conversation thread with any experience. I didnt say anything TO the provider who is the subject of the conversation. I didnt say anything TO ANYONE who is trans. I spoke about my experience. One which none of these bitchy queens would have been willing to take. Yet all seem to want to pile-on with an feeling of superiority about how to discuss something we disliked. You all should stick to having tea with your grandmother and nibbling on watercress sandwiches. I'm sure the polite conversation about the weather is as much as you can bear. My opinion holds. Beware the swollen (former)lady parts.

Its prime Rhubarb and Strawberry season right now.

You need to specify WHERE you are located.

They are a fine example of successful hormone therapy.

I was actually thinking YOU were being the drama queen. Its time to put your claws and your Lee press-on nails away and let's get back to the subject. @haring222 was asking about being with trans men. No one else has contributed to THAT conversation but ME. ..so let's stop with the petty bickering about how I express myself.

No. I don't. Sorry. We will simply end this here by saying we disagree on the matter of how discussion forums work. My opinions stand. @haring222 Feel free to reach out in PM if you would cafe to hear any additional experiences (as to not disturb the fragile sensitivities of certain gentlemen.)

I am responding to THIS: "I have not had experience with a trans man before and have always wondered what it was like." I shared my experiences and my advice on things to think about when entertaining the idea of approaching a trans person with a male identity. Yes. I find clitoris stitched into the shape of a tiny penis to be disgusting. I fail to see how this makes you feel I am attacking your "community". Are you a transexual ? Do you have a micropenis ?Should I LIE and tell the gentleman who originally asked the question about how exciting it was to see a limp piece of flesh lying next to a stitched up vag and I thought: wow thats HOT. This righteous indignation some of you people wear like some badge of honor is tiresome and misplaced.

Well...no. The difference between you and me is that I have no problem sharing an honest opinion and your "shame" leads you to believe that having one is wrong. I have no problem with people disagreeing with my opinion, but I have little tolerance for those who tell me I can't have one. As far as the trans issue . .I feel you are speaking too much to defend something you have ZERO experience with. Go lick a swollen clitoris sewn into the shape of a tiny penis and get back to me with how much you had a wonderful time, and that every body is beautiful .

I have never met AxelZar (not my type). but I can second the opinion about Thickmuscle. He's a sweetheart. (However based on some comments I've heard here, he's a YRMV provider when it comes to sexual interest).

(I will assume you meant "human beings") I am curious. Since you have such a superior opinion of yourself .... How many trans-male-expressing people have YOU slept with ?

No. The thread is about hooking up with a trans person who is male-presenting. I have experience with this as well as preferences and I shared them in response to the question. If you disagree, with my opinion you are free to share your own, but your pontificating about finding everyone beautiful is beyond my wheelhouse and frankly ridiculous. You do you...but I am not playing along with that nonsense so you can keep it to yourself.

Racism never stopped being "socially acceptable" in some circles. I think, now that social media platforms stopped "scrubbing" offensive opinions from the conversation threads we are simply given more ACCESS to seeing whats been lurking forever. Not that there are more of them.

Exactly my thought. I always reach out on the R.M.platform first. If they prefer to discuss via IM on their phone #, they will say so.

Call me confused. How is this guy "blonde" ? 🤔 Hes got brown hair in every photo.

Its remarkable, the number of little old ladies here who like to play Miss Manners...while knowing fully well, they wouldn't fuck that Trans pussy for love or money. Back to the subject: I failed to notice the reported 4 inches under dick size. (Which is likely an exaggeration) The Journal of Sexual Medicine published an article in 2024 where the author noted the tendency of trans people grossly over exaggerate the size of their micropenis. In MY OPINION ..the surgical procedure to produce a tiny flaccid micropenis only serves to satisfy the trans person's emotional need for male identity. There is nothing remotely functional about the fleshy little peanut that gets stitched on to the clitoris. I have been with a few trans male people who did NOT do bottom surgery, and I found the experience sexually satisfying, in the way I was able to vaginally penetrate the individual, while visually being stimulated by their masculine appearance, rather than the typical female qualities associated with vaginal intercourse. After bottom surgery you are left with the usual gay-sex anal penetration and a sad lump of flesh that can't get hard, nor ejaculate. SEE: Visual estimation of penis size among, transgender and cisgender people and implications for genital gender-affirming surgery and sexual medicine, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, Volume 21, Issue 2, February 2024, Pages 175–180,

I wasnt speaking to the trans person. So all this righteousness indignation is misplaced.

I was never much of a bottom myself. But certain powerful muscular men with incredible looks and presence do make me willing to let them have their way with me.

Buy a thick rubber band at Staples office supply. You can get a bag of them for less than $5. Throw them away after you get cum all over them. https://www.staples.com/staples-economy-rubber-bands-84-1-4-lb-bag-45-pack-28608-cc/product_831636?cid=ps:gs:dot:nb:pla:os&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=14022539715&gclid=Cj0KCQjwmK_CBhCEARIsAMKwcD7EAKtjBQQn6xhyujAdha0LzTBimF-N2NAd8Rz-be1NvIfI0tGnajMaApWYEALw_wcB

This forum is a group of people sharing opinions. If you dont care about MY opinion, you're free to BLOCK me. Meanwhile my opinion is as valid as any of yours. So it stands as i expressed it. Micropenis/pussy = gross. They are an attractive trans person and I would happily fuck their pussy as long as it doesn't have a revolting micro penis attached to it. THAT would make me throw up.

That's quite an impressive transformation. Breast reduction is seamless, unless they photoshopped the scars out of the picture. My advice would be to first understand whether or not this person had "bottom surgery". I find the resulting micro-penis to be unappealing to the point of revulsion. I have no issues with a trans-man leaving their vagina intact. But I do very much NOT like the look of the mess that bottom surgery creates.

True. I probably said dozens because thats what I know. Far from proficient. It helps me recognize some of the most basic and common signage. There are about a hundred symbols (dozens) that are used over and over in different combinations. To be proficient you need to know at least 2000 symbols. I understand there are tens of thousands of symbols that highly educated people may learn. State of being /existence /possession/ people/ soft/ hard ..etc etc are used to create various descriptions of things. For example the symbol for water is an essence that can be used to describe water related objects but also to describe a flow or liquid states. Similar to European language roots that form words along with prefixes and suffixes that have specific meaning, but can be used to create new concepts when combined in different ways. I think the most obvious in Europe is German with its long descriptive words. "Auspufftopfdämpfer" always comes to mind.