pubic_assistance

Then why did @BtmBearDad just indicate that both his doctor and his reading agrees with my statement ? So clearly I am NOT "spreading misinformation". You may be reading misinformation because the pharmaceutical industry likes to paint a rosier picture of their product.

I fail to see why you immediately assume I am "pretending". I am hardly here "from morning until night". I take mental breaks during the day to get away from paperwork, so I check various online chats that I participate in. It's five minutes here and there.

Ah. Well hello again ! Sorry, I over estimated the time passed and had you closer to 40 by now. I don't know why I remembered you telling me you moved here from Turkey. Just shows that I'm getting old and cant' keep my handsome companions straight in my head. Nice to see you're still well and in the business. Will have to reconnect some day soon.

Again...this is a discussion board, and not my college dissertation. I didn't include a bibliography. My comment stated clearly that this was my conclusion "from all the reading I've done". I didn't just read it today, so I don't have the articles at my finger tips, but I can say that I am not inclined to believe puff pieces. I also don't believe articles that are sponsored by the Pharmaceutical Industry. So you DO need to do some digging. If I have a minute, I will look to see if I did save any of the articles. Right now, I'm at work and just taking a lunch break.

From ALL the reading I've done the efficacy that the pharmaceutical companies taut is ONLY valid IF you never miss a single dose. Then the range is 97% to 99 % . ( Pharmaceutical company claims 99% while independent studies show 97% ). You need to dig a bit to find the independent studies because big pharma spends a lot to keep their data coming up first when you research. To me, 3% risk is still a risk. However topping as opposed to bottoming also reduces your risk.

Prep is never 100% effective and it's only 97% effective IF you take it 100% perfectly on schedule ( which virtually NO ONE does ). So yeah...if you KNOW someone is HIV positive and they just shot a load in your ass..you should probably wait to see if you got the bullet in your game of Russian PreP Roulette

So you're 14 inches hard ? 😳

I am guessing Goecke's award winning 2015 choreography "Thin Skin" was autobiographical 😉

No I literally have no idea how one has anything to do with the other.

No. But they were pretty irregular in their doses. Gilead likes to promote their 99% efficacy number but what they don't tell you is that it's actually 97% in independent trials and that's ONLY when you take it 100% daily ....which 77% of gay men DO NOT !!! https://www.poz.com/article/iPrEx-OLE-results-25922-2484

NO. Gay men like to pretend they have no idea what that means. Ignoring something doesn't make the obvious not obvious to others.

True. But again... after going through thousands of condoms. I've never had one tear. Did one ever leak a drop of cum ? That I wouldn't know. Have I ever experienced a complete failure ? No. ( and I was a complete WHORE in my 20s )

Well... grammatically speaking. "Masseurs that go all the way" is not the same thing as "Since masseurs do go all the way". They are different topics of conversation. So perhaps you are reading into the conversation something that wasn't intended.

My personal experience would be the other way around. Bisexual men advertising as "straight" is a successful marketing tool for part of the marketplace of men who have sex with men. I am attracted to masculine straight acting men, and turned off by effeminate gay acting men. So I'm part of the audience they are marketing to.

At my age, I must have gone through thousands of condoms. I've never had one "fall off". I literally have no idea how that would happen. As far as the occasional torn condom, since I'm 99% top, that's really not my problem. ( and I am HIV negative so it's not theirs either) but for most people, yes. Point taken. Doubling up on your protection is smarter than relying on everyone popping their pills religiously.

This is a fine example of why I just assume everyone is HIV positive and never fuck without condoms. It's completely irresponsible behavior but you can't prevent this in other people, you can only control what you do to protect your health.

One floor is the home of MMX NYC which is a group who sponsor massage and yoga events as well as some more private erotic group events for members only. During the day they allow private masseurs to rent out the suites if there are no other events scheduled . The other floor is more of a WeWork situation with a variety of providers renting out space to service their clients.

Ok so gay girls are just as bad ..but not about the subject of HIV and PreP..so I only mentioned the guys

The ga y boys love their righteous indignation. "Undetectable" is good news for the person who's got HIV but bad news for everyone else. They go around acting as if they are now free to bareback everyone they meet. Don't fall for the story. It's Russian Roulette barebacking with poz people. Condoms are your best defense when you're reliant on a drug that isn't effective when it's not taken 100% of the time and even then is 98% effective. There's 2% of bullets in that gun.

Ok. What did I miss ? I read it again

Bravo

Beautiful story. Thanks for sharing.

That is pretty much the standard rule at any massage business. You're not in Bangkok. Prostitution will get the place busted.

NYC 51 West 14th Street Also the location for MMX

Wha ? I would totally fuck Justin Timberlake!