coriolis888

Maybe you don't care about whether a provider is truly hung or not but some bottoms do, just like many tops would rather hire a guy with a nice bubble butt!

There are many good observations in these last few posts.   I don’t think it is about race.  It is about how much you trust someone you don’t know very well.  I have been with white, black, and brown and prefer to protect my privacy and valuables until we know each other well enough that we have developed that mutual trust. 

How did this work? You guys were traveling together? Was there even sex involved?- if not, maybe worth reporting. Details?

If rentmen were paid in crypto currency instead of cash, only six hundred euros ANNUALLY are exempt from income tax in Germany where rentmen is co-based in Holland.  
What would be the purpose or logic for rentmen to switch to all crypto currency payments to save income tax on six hundred euros?
Cash/currency and crypto currency will continue as they currently are (taxable) unless current tax laws change, which is highly unlikely. 
To make up for the lost tax revenue, Germany and Holland would have to make new laws to survive the loss of tax revenue that would be forgiven for using crypto currency.   Everyone would switch to crypto currency; no one would pay tax.  Nope, not going to happen.  
If it were as simple as shown in the post, no one would accept cash in stores or even a paycheck if crypto currency were exempt from income tax (except 600 euros each year).  
 
 
 
  
 
 

If rentmen were paid in crypto currency instead of cash, only six hundred euros ANNUALLY are exempt from income tax in Germany where rentmen is co-based in Holland.  
What would be the purpose or logic for rentmen to switch to all crypto currency payments to save income tax on six hundred euros?
Cash/currency and crypto currency will continue as they currently are (taxable) unless current tax laws change, which is highly unlikely. 
To make up for the lost tax revenue, Germany and Holland would have to make new laws to survive the loss of tax revenue that would be forgiven for using crypto currency.   Everyone would switch to crypto currency; no one would pay tax.  Nope, not going to happen.  
If it were as simple as shown in the post, no one would accept cash in stores or even a paycheck if crypto currency were exempt from income tax (except 600 euros each year).  
 
 
 
  
 
 

Bozo e-mailed Rentmen.com.
I thanked them for their new rules. If these changes will ensure their continued financial viability so they can remain in business, they should be congratulated for implementing them. If necessary, they should make further changes.
Rentmen.com should continue to focus on serving the needs of those who support them, namely the escorts and paying members. Despite what some here may think, Rentmen is a business, not a charity.
BoZo
 

I have a strong feeling that soon RM will only accept Bitcoin for payment. This is the direction they are taking steps to reach. 
 
with only accepting Bitcoin they wont have to pay cc processing fees and can fully avoid any possible taxation on their profits.   
 
Why / How can they make these "painful" business decisions to their members/escorts ?   They have a near total monopoly and can get away with it.   
 
Yes, they will lose advertisers & paying members but the amount of savings will be lucrative and off set any possible defections. 

And this post is why people should research more into crypto before making (wrong) assumptions.
Thank you for an educated posting on crypto and tax.  

If rentmen were paid in crypto currency instead of cash, only six hundred euros ANNUALLY are exempt from income tax in Germany where rentmen is co-based in Holland.  
What would be the purpose or logic for rentmen to switch to all crypto currency payments to save income tax on six hundred euros?
Cash/currency and crypto currency will continue as they currently are (taxable) unless current tax laws change, which is highly unlikely. 
To make up for the lost tax revenue, Germany and Holland would have to make new laws to survive the loss of tax revenue that would be forgiven for using crypto currency.   Everyone would switch to crypto currency; no one would pay tax.  Nope, not going to happen.  
If it were as simple as shown in the post, no one would accept cash in stores or even a paycheck if crypto currency were exempt from income tax (except 600 euros each year).  
 
 
 
  
 
 

If rentmen were paid in crypto currency instead of cash, only six hundred euros ANNUALLY are exempt from income tax in Germany where rentmen is co-based in Holland.  
What would be the purpose or logic for rentmen to switch to all crypto currency payments to save income tax on six hundred euros?
Cash/currency and crypto currency will continue as they currently are (taxable) unless current tax laws change, which is highly unlikely. 
To make up for the lost tax revenue, Germany and Holland would have to make new laws to survive the loss of tax revenue that would be forgiven for using crypto currency.   Everyone would switch to crypto currency; no one would pay tax.  Nope, not going to happen.  
If it were as simple as shown in the post, no one would accept cash in stores or even a paycheck if crypto currency were exempt from income tax (except 600 euros each year).  
 
 
 
  
 
 

Rentmen is the largest provider advertising site in the U.S. and Canada.
Most of us already know that Rentmen recently put in new rules that require a fee from non advertisers (clients) in order to send in a review about an experience with a hired provider.  The fee is $240 yearly to rentmen, not to a provider.  
This requirement of paying rentmen a fee to write a review does potential harm to clients and providers who use Rentmen because of the inability to warn other clients (via reviews) of good or bad experiences from a provider. 
Moreover, there are some providers with fake photos and other dishonest claims advertising their services on rentmen.  Unless a client is willing to come up with $240 per year to give to rentmen, no review is allowed about the encounter between the client and the provider.  For the $240, a client is allowed to write reviews and watch some sort of animated video that are free on many world-wide sites.  
Now we have a new strange requirement set up by rentmen.  I was advised by someone I know who advertises on rentmen that all advertisement photos that show any genitalia in the advertisement photos must be removed.   
Such a requirement is bound to have a negative effect on providers who pay rentmen to advertise on their site.    
Rentmen is making many negative rules for both their advertising clients and the readers of rentmen who pay to hire the providers paying rentmen.  
I realize everyone wants to make money, however, the changes made by rentmen seem like a one-way street in favor of only rentmen.  
If this disclosure has already been made elsewhere on the site, please excuse the repeat.  I cannot find any other mention of this travesty.  

Here is a note from my urologist on The gel 
Doesn’t work. Not practical or cost effective because such a small percentage of the applied medication gets absorbed transdermally. Believe me, I would be offering it to patients long ago if it did work. 

There is a provider advertising currently on rentmen in California stating that he has Trimex available.  
Could I be wrong in believing all that I have read about Trimex and that it must be injected directly into the penis for it to work and make the penis hard?
I am thinking that any client that would engage a rentmen provider and allow such provider to inject Trimex into his penis is irresponsible or absolutely crazy.
Here is a portion of the provider's ad where it offers Trimex:
GOLD PORNSTAR SPONSOR RM OF THE DAY VERIFIED PHOTO About HunterJameson
⭐️PremiumPig⭐️🐷
HAVE TRIMEX AVAILABLE
The full ad:
HunterJameson - Pornstar Performer, Rentboy, Gay Massage in Walnut Creek, CA | RentMen
RENTMEN.EU Pornstar Performer & Rentboy in Walnut Creek, CA - HunterJameson: ⭐️PremiumPig⭐️🐷  

There is a provider advertising currently on rentmen in California stating that he has Trimex available.  
Could I be wrong in believing all that I have read about Trimex and that it must be injected directly into the penis for it to work and make the penis hard?
I am thinking that any client that would engage a rentmen provider and allow such provider to inject Trimex into his penis is irresponsible or absolutely crazy.
Here is a portion of the provider's ad where it offers Trimex:
GOLD PORNSTAR SPONSOR RM OF THE DAY VERIFIED PHOTO About HunterJameson
⭐️PremiumPig⭐️🐷
HAVE TRIMEX AVAILABLE
The full ad:
HunterJameson - Pornstar Performer, Rentboy, Gay Massage in Walnut Creek, CA | RentMen
RENTMEN.EU Pornstar Performer & Rentboy in Walnut Creek, CA - HunterJameson: ⭐️PremiumPig⭐️🐷  

I just wrote it, since I am Cuban!!!!…😊🇨🇺😈😉❤️❤️!!!!

FWIW, in his RM ad he says “beware of Grindr scam. I don’t have Grindr.”
 

I guess we can't get passed the tattoos

This comment is totally uncalled for. Either you are saying rgsnva is a liar or you are blaming the victim. Neither is acceptable.

You do not work in law.  Therefore, your statement is incorrect and borders on being hillarious.  
I always thought that your prior posts were controversial but well constructed and made sense. 
However, your lack of understanding of the simple phrase "unjust enrichment" tells me a lot about you.  

He has had various ads up on rentmen in California for the past several months.  The ads get taken down often.  Up a few days then down again then back again.  
He seems to have a lot of guilt attached to escorting.   Maybe that is why he claims he escorts only to pay his school tuition.  
If he started his rentmen ad six months ago in California and is now in New York, where is he getting his "studies"?
He has a friend in California who comes on the phone who speaks better English than he and that friend seems very protective of the provider.   
I never got together with the provider because of the odd way he behaved on the phone.  
In my opinion, some of his photos in his ad show a handsome guy while some of the photos show an odd vacant and angry expression.  
He is from Brazil.  
I will not be contacting him again.    
 

I know an escort who emailed him about it and never got a reply.
They should all complain about it! Only allowing premium members to see pictures of their 🍆 will hurt their business! 

He has had various ads up on rentmen in California for the past several months.  The ads get taken down often.  Up a few days then down again then back again.  
He seems to have a lot of guilt attached to escorting.   Maybe that is why he claims he escorts only to pay his school tuition.  
If he started his rentmen ad six months ago in California and is now in New York, where is he getting his "studies"?
He has a friend in California who comes on the phone who speaks better English than he and that friend seems very protective of the provider.   
I never got together with the provider because of the odd way he behaved on the phone.  
In my opinion, some of his photos in his ad show a handsome guy while some of the photos show an odd vacant and angry expression.  
He is from Brazil.  
I will not be contacting him again.    
 

I honestly don't mind paying rn, but I won't and can't use my personal credit card. They need you to be able to gift it. Then I can pay a provider extra and they gift it to me, and I'll review them well....

I usually set the minimum age on rentmen advanced search options to 38.
40+ is the set spot for me. Luke looks like a man. 

I am not specifically exposing anyone. 
However, on rentmen during this year, one particular provider was "rentmen of the day" twice.  
That same escort has been advertising for many years on rentmen.  Two years ago, his ad used to state that he was HIV +.  
Now, his ad does not say anything about his HIV + status. 
I believe some States in the U.S. require sex workers (and certain others) to disclose their HIV-positive status.  There is a criminal penalty in those states for failure to disclose prior to a sex act with another person.   
I do not know if the person is using PREP which would somewhat expiate for his failure to be truthfully disclosed. 
I also do not know if the person verbally tells a potential client of his HIV status prior to any meeting. 
It was certainly shocking for me to see the "rentmen of the year" (twice for this same provider) omit his previously disclosed HIV status.   
The bottom line is do not believe everything that is written (or not written) in a provider's advertisement.