ApexNomad

Your comments reveal a profound immaturity and a glaring double standard. By now labeling providers with numerous reviews as robots, you not only demonstrate a lack of understanding but also expose your own biases. It’s telling that you find it acceptable to sleep with a porn star, whose experience is likely far greater, yet dismiss providers based on their review count as if they’re less deserving of respect. Your focus on my reference to nationality is a weak attempt to deflect from the hypocrisy in your stance. To assume that someone’s worth diminishes with experience is not only misguided but also reflects your inability to engage with nuance. Having taken the painful labor of reading through your previous thread, it’s clear that you’re more invested in preserving your narrow view than in recognizing the rich complexities of the industry. This speaks volumes about your perspective and worldview. Ultimately, your refusal to confront these complexities reveals a limited understanding of human experience, prioritizing shallow judgments over the dignity of others.

So, it’s a red flag if a provider has too many reviews, but somehow it’s fine to sleep with a famous Czech porn actor who’s likely been with countless partners? You call it a preference, but your original post reads as judgment, plain and simple. Trying to spin it now doesn’t erase the double standard—you hold providers to one set of rules while making exceptions when it suits you. That’s hypocrisy! And let’s be clear: I’m not putting words in your mouth. Your original post did all the talking. If you don’t like how it sounds, maybe you should rethink what you’re actually saying.

It’s interesting that you’ve now posted about preferring guys with just the right amount of reviews, right after that long, convoluted thread where you emphasized being this Czech porn star’s first and only client and explained how he’s not an escort and isn’t jaded by the industry. It’s worth noting that as a porn star, it’s perfectly acceptable for him to have slept with many people, but when it comes to escorts, having multiple clients suddenly raises red flags for you? There seems to be a lot of effort here to separate your experience while imposing arbitrary standards on others. But back to the topic of reviews, aren’t reviews, especially on platforms like RM, just a baseline? They provide merely a foundation of trust and transparency, helping people get a sense of the provider’s reputation and experience. Plus, it’s worth noting that not everyone posts reviews on RM—it’s not a fully accurate representation. It doesn’t account for regulars, aspects of their personal life, or the full spectrum of their connections. A lot can be learned through your own interactions, whether by text or, ideally, over the phone, and every experience with a provider is unique. So, only having 6-10 reviews means they’re “safe,” but 100+ reviews means they’re somehow too experienced? Why the cut-off? Or are we trying to “slut shame” providers for doing their job? Let’s not go there. Rather than focusing on review counts, wouldn’t it make more sense to prioritize compatibility and the quality of connection? Real connection goes beyond the numbers, and reviews can simply ensure that your experience starts off on the right foot.

Why does he advertise as Puerto Rican if he’s Dominican? Honestly, I could care less what he is—as long as he’s a nice guy.

My first love was a college wrestler, and he had a massive endowment that was hard to miss. He was constantly “re-adjusting the goods.” He was a shower and if you can imagine a grower too! On the mat, he was a beast, but off the mat, he was the sweetest, most loyal gentle giant. I always wondered what he saw in me.

And that makes all the difference, especially when asking for a boyfriend experience.

I’d also like to note that it tends to be these same tops who exhibit impatience if you need a moment to adjust to their size, as if they’re somehow doing you a favor.

In our society, masculinity is often tied to physical attributes, particularly the size of a man’s penis. This fixation can lead to feelings of inadequacy among men who believe they don’t measure up. It’s an unfortunate narrative that equates worth with size—whether it’s a big house, a big job, big money, or a big dick. The famous gay porn film “The Bigger the Better,” featuring Matt Ramsey and Rick Donovan, says it all in its title. These ideals are especially prevalent in traditionally conservative areas, where rigid norms overshadow diverse expressions of male identity. This creates challenges for those who are gay or don’t conform, as acceptance tends to be limited. In contrast, urban settings offer greater acceptance and a wider array of identities, allowing individuals to embrace their authentic selves. This raises the question: how can we redefine masculinity to celebrate diversity rather than conforming to narrow standards? We need to foster a culture where every individual feels valued, regardless of their physical attributes. Hopefully, I will see more of this change in my lifetime.

Public transport? That’s cute! But I still prefer my cars—I decide who gets in, and I like my rides uninterrupted! 😉

Two guys, Matt and Chris, are alone together, and Matt says, “Tell me something dirty.” Chris smirks, leans in, and whispers, “The dishes… haven’t been washed… in three days.” Matt grins and says, “Oh, you know just how to get me going.”

For men, especially in gay culture, it’s often the endowment that becomes the hang-up. But you reach an age where you stop giving a shit about any of your insecurities—and that’s where real confidence begins.

Except I don’t lease my cars—I own them outright. 😉

The whole sugar daddy thing cracks me up. At that point, why not just go all in? Let’s be a couple! Screw it! We could start planning our retirement together—I’ll handle the bingo cards, and he can bring the energy drinks! The transactional vibe of sugar daddy relationships feels a bit too clinical for me; it’s like taking the client/escort dynamic and just slapping a “relationship” label on it. If we’re both getting what we want, let’s make it real instead of keeping it transactional!

You make a great point about the timing and long-term implications of insurance. For businesses, self-insuring or joining pools makes sense, especially with a three-year breakeven. For homeowners, especially in high-risk areas, the costs can feel disproportionate to the benefits, especially if you won’t be in the home long enough to see a return on investment. With inflation affecting home values and payouts, it adds another layer of complexity. Ultimately, it’s about balancing peace of mind with financial reality.

You may just want to hire an escort at that point, unless there’s a massage component that only a trained masseur can bring. But from what you’re describing, an escort seems better suited. Literally say what you just wrote.

We still love you!

Thanks. I don’t see the submit vote box. Am I not allowed to vote because I’m still considered a newbie? The hand icon feels like a scarlet letter.

Profile expired.

Such a helpful bunch. 😄 Maybe a moderator can direct me then on how to send in my mail-in ballot for this all important enema vote.