ApexNomad

It might seem like an exaggeration, but after watching so many of my brothers die from AIDS, getting HIV felt like an immediate death sentence. The fear of getting it, the uncertainty… it was something we all carried in those days. I understand the analogy.

That’s what happens when you see it in previews. 😂 I must have been too distracted by Ricky’s bulge in the 5th row orchestra to notice the surrounding shit show.

Respectfully, I think you might be doing yourself a disservice by venting frustrations and sharing your view of prospective clients to this degree in a forum that’s largely made up of clients and potential clients. To be clear, I’m not saying your frustrations aren’t valid, nor that you shouldn’t vent. But considering the audience and platform, I’m not sure I’d go to such lengths as you have. Maybe try bouncing your frustrations off other provider friends offline or people outside the business. Conversely, if you don’t see this platform as a means to attract new clients as a byproduct of engagement, then by all means, vent away!

I thought the 2012 Broadway revival of Evita had its moments, but ultimately, it felt a bit underwhelming. Elena Roger’s portrayal of Eva Perón was definitely unique, but I found her vocal performance lacking the powerhouse presence I was expecting. She captured Eva’s ambition and fiery spirit, but some of the iconic numbers didn’t have the punch I was hoping for. Her voice, while distinctive, just didn’t always hit the mark for me. Ricky Martin, as Che, was charismatic and brought some star appeal, but I felt like his performance missed the intensity that the character demands. He had great stage presence and his vocals were fine, but Che felt more like a narrator than the rebellious, biting figure he’s meant to be. It left the show feeling a little softer, especially given the political edge Evita usually carries. I did enjoy Michael Cerveris as Juan Perón, though. His performance was one of the highlights for me—subtle and nuanced, which provided a nice contrast to the more flamboyant moments. The staging and set design were visually striking, and the choreography added some energy to the ensemble numbers. Still, I thought the production, in general, relied a little too much on spectacle rather than digging deeper into the emotional core of the story.

Interesting casting choice. I also read ALW and Lloyd are teaming up on his new original musical, “The Illusionist.”

Very open! For some providers, this is a side gig, so an early morning appointment could be ideal for them too, before their regular job. Never assume a provider’s availability or willingness to accommodate—the worst they can say is no. Always ask!

He’s gorgeous!! I really appreciate the variety of photos—they give me a great sense of who he is in and out of bed. In gym clothes, work clothes, lying down with his head on the pillow (which is my favorite)—he’s created the perfect ad.

Very!!

Do you know if he also escorts? Thanks.

Then these must be the young providers—which is exactly why I deal with the mature ones. If I were to ask a new provider - in text no less - what his favorite dirty words were, and he didn’t block me right then and there, then he deserves to have his time wasted.

How much juicy information are providers texting to potential clients that would result in them masturbating? And to not shut it down? Not saying it doesn’t happen, just seems odd. I can see how clients can waste a provider’s time with endless back and forth texts of scheduling, being non-committal, etc., which is unfortunate. But masturbating?

I get how frustrating it must be to deal with flaky clients and last-minute changes. Setting boundaries to protect your time and resources is totally fair, but keep in mind that adding too many conditions can sometimes turn new clients away. Do you have regulars? Along with staying open to new clients, consider leveraging those regulars by making sure they get first-class treatment. Offering little enticements that feel good for you to make, but can big impact. I’m not necessarily talking discounts, but little gestures like staying a bit past the agreed time or a follow-up text to say thanks. They’re the ones who come back over and over because they genuinely enjoy the full experience with you and how you make them feel. A balance of solid policies and focus on your loyal clients could help make things more predictable and rewarding. Good luck—sounds like you’ve been through a lot on the road!

This sums it up for me!! From Adventures in Babysitting: Brenda: Uh, those are hot dogs, right? Hot Dog Vendor: Yeah, want one? Brenda: Mmm, yeah I'd love one. Hot Dog Vendor: That'll be two bucks. Hot Dog Vendor: [Brenda hands him a check, he stares incredulously] A check? Brenda: Yeah, but it's a good check. See, Chris' mom wrote it to Chris 'cause Chris bought her something, I can't remember what. Then I bought Chris some press-on nails, I gave Chris the difference, and she wrote the check over to me. So I'll write the check over to you, you keep the difference, and I'll take the hot dog. So, you got a pen? Hot Dog Vendor: Get outta here! Brenda: Wait! I'm starving, you'd rather throw it away than give it to me? Hot Dog Vendor: I work on a cash-only basis. Brenda: But it's a perfectly good check! Hot Dog Vendor: No! I'll make it very clear. You slip me the cash, and I'll slip you the weiner. Brenda: But I don't have any cash! Hot Dog Vendor: Then I don't have a weiner!

If we’re talking providers, I have so many happy memories and beautiful moments. One that really stands out? I remember walking him to the door, tucking the white envelope into his back pocket, giving his ass a gentle squeeze, and thanking him so much for his time. The hug lingered longer than usual. I closed the door, but maybe ten seconds later, there was a knock. I glanced around the room, wondering if he’d left something behind. Had I accidentally short-changed him? When I opened the door, he looked at me and said, “I forgot something.” Before I could respond, he stepped back in, grabbed my face, and kissed me!

1. The Cancer Fund of America (2015): 99% of the donations collected were spent on “fundraising expenses” and executive salaries, leaving a tiny fraction for actual charitable programs. Verdict: shut down. 2. The Children’s Cancer Fund (2016): 99% for “fundraising activities” and lavish salaries for its staff. Much like the Cancer Fund of America, very little of the donations were spent on direct assistance for children with cancer. Verdict: shut down. 3. The United States Fire Victims Fund (2017): This fund, which was supposed to help victims of fires, particularly in California, came under scrutiny when investigations showed that 99% of the donations went to “fundraisers” and staff salaries, leaving almost no money for victims. Verdict: shut down. Etc. As of now, that we know of, there are no widely publicized cases of major nonprofit organizations where 99% of donations go to executive salaries or administrative costs. However, there are still many small or less-known organizations that may engage in questionable practices, though they typically don’t attract the same level of attention unless they are caught in major investigations.