Decatur Guy

On 10/17/2023 at 9:28 AM, Peter Eater said:

Curious to know whether the review idea is still active, since it was first floated six months ago. A complex project for sure!

I am curious about that myself. The whole 411 thing just isn't as good (but still better than nothing).

3 minutes ago, Harryinny said:

Dubai and Singapore collect the hottest guys!

They do seem to. And given the general cultures of both places, I'd be cautious in either. I wish James would pay a visit to Atlanta!

I can tell I'm on vacation because I'm making more inquiries than usual! Anyone got the 411 / recent experience with this guy. I like his voice and looks/body a lot. I'm somewhat scared off by the tool and I often wonder about hard-on abilities with the extra-large guys. Usually I bypass the extra-larges, but I like everything else enough to get more curious. 

Does anyone have experiences with this guy in the past year or two?

 

I agree with you about ads. Providers understandably feel the need to not be too direct. But sometimes it's hard to read between the lines. 

From the perspective of a client: If some gives me a discount (let's say $300 instead of his usual $350), he goes to the top of my "call-first" list. 

This website is basically one big referral system with some interesting side conversations. But the bread and butter is the "411 on ______."

On 10/4/2023 at 2:20 PM, DynamicUno said:

There was another Orlando latin couple, Alex and Rob who were also real life partners and advertised as a package deal.  I am glad I got the chance to meet them before they retired from the scene, they had a knack for working together to make sure a third enjoyed their time with them.

I met with them once .They were great but more than I could handle!

Kind of a side topic to all of this but to follow up on what Vin Marco mentioned about premium clients being taken a bit more seriously:

I'm glad to read that some providers recognize that, because I don't think most providers pay any attention to that or to our profiles on there. To the point I'm not sure most of them are aware of the option of reading up on the potential client. The main thing they seem to notice is whether I've looked at an ad or not. I'll sometimes get "thanks for visiting my ad" notices, which I assume are automatic.

But very few providers have seemed to read my profile or see the reviews I've left. It's a good resource many seem to skip out on, especially for providers who don't want "endless texting." I've been treated with skepticism when my profile indicates otherwise.

10 minutes ago, wsc said:

I find him tempting but would be reluctant. Findom is a red-ish flag.

Yeah -- like if someone thinks you should be giving him $300 for just asking, I'm not sure that person would be very enthused about body-to-contact for an hour.

I searched for previous threads and didn't find any. As anyone had any encounters with him in the past 18 months or so? He's quite handsome!
 

He's hot but I'm always a little bit wary of anyone who brings up findom. I wouldn't totally rule them out, but it smacks of wanting a lot and giving nothing. 

In the whole issue of can you see nudes or not even on premium, I am regularly looking on the dot "eu" site. But I logged in to rent.men just now. And I can still see Romka's large, proud erection on either platform. Eu or the regular. 

Maybe this will all catch up to me at any minute. But as of 4 p.m. ET Monday, I can still see full frontal in public pics. Private pics are still a thing in some profiles. And I can access videos. I'm on a premium membership at $19.95 (which is a recent big increase; I've also had an issue a couple of times with the credit card not going through).

And please don't shout at me in boldfaced, enlarged type. I'm just reporting what I can see at the current time and what has been happening in my account. I'm not responsible for these decisions, the mess ups at RM or anyone's frustrations over them happening.

Perhaps by tomorrow, it will be different on my screen. It's hardly the first time in the history of the internet that different people in different places on different browsers and on different plans see different things. 

One silver lining to this: Maybe it will force some providers to have more thoughtful and informative write-ups instead dashing off a couple of lines and then posting some pictures. I know this is a very visual market, but I value what a provider has to say equally with what he looks like. And I value the general photos as much as the nude ones. I realize I am most likely in the minority on that.

I pay the premium membership, so I've noticed no changes. And I posted a review last week with no issue. 

Given he has only four reviews, it's probably a long shot anyone has met up with EmilioCGR. But if you have, do you have any intel/recommendations you're willing to share? I'm drawn to him, but something I can't quite put my finger on is holding me back a little, too. Maybe it's the multitude of pictures in pretty much the same pose and with sunglasses? I just don't know.
 

22 minutes ago, Luv2play said:

That's what I thought too. He is not your typical escort.😛

I'd play a $100 "fame premium" for someone I really liked. That's about my limit though. I've learned through experience the "fame" factor can disappoint and the "unknown" factor can delightfully surprise. I've thought about contacting him before but honestly figured he'd ask more than that and never reached out.

1 hour ago, Luv2play said:

He's quoted me $450US or Cdn equivalent in Toronto

That's not so bad given the typical going rate is $300 to $350 these days.

In particular, I'll pass on anyone with a bizarre name such as "ItWillHurt" or "AssDestroyer" or "Bedroom Bully" or "Your King." I'm all for the right dominant, Alpha type, but please. 

I'm curious about him too

While physical appearance matters to me, it's not the most important thing. I care more about the vibe, the scenario and what they're doing. Plus, I find a pretty wide variety of types attractive. I'm not hooked on a particular body shape or younger/older or one particular ethnicity, etc. So I'm all for porn casting a wider net. 

My ideal porno scene: Two masculine, verbal tops talking a shy, reluctant bottom into having sex and then pushing his limits. And if they happen to be "average Joes" vs. model looks, that's fine.

On 9/19/2023 at 10:27 AM, Jason Dutch said:

Just on a break right now while I help my mom through chemo. Thanks for checking in.

Helping your mom through an illness is tough and commendable. Been there. Good vibes to both of you.

I've actually hired a few times without ever seeing a face. It's never gone badly. I've even wore a blindfold (my idea) a couple of times. Once, that didn't turn out to be a good idea. The other time, it was hot.

Usually, if a first meeting doesn't go that well, I don't request a second meeting. However, there are exceptions. Sometimes, the meet-up was on the fence -- not as well as I hoped but still an OK time. And I'm especially prone to request a second meeting if I know I wasn't bringing my A-game that night. 

My very first meet-up with a provider didn't go well at all. But I rehired him a year later anyway because I felt like the disappointment was on me, not on him. Second time was much better. And I got one last chance before he retired, and it was off the charts great.

More often, the scenario is I think the first meet-up went well, but I never get to arrange a second one because it was a guy traveling through and he didn't come back or he entered and exited the business in quick order or I happened to catch up near the end of his time in business. For every provider I wouldn't see again, and I think of two I would see again and haven't had the chance. (Looking at you Scott DeMarco).

 

Part of my inner motive in bringing this up is I'm not a good looking guy but I am very sexual. I've often wondered if I would have done that kind of work if I had the looks. Let's face it -- you can have all the other needed attributes, but if you don't have the right looks, the rest doesn't matter. It has to be the whole package.

I'm wondering what my "standards" would be if I been better looking. I think I still could crossed that hurdle. Because I do indeed see the attractiveness in a wide variety of people. I'm not sure I could have overcome the fear of arrest, etc. And then my prime time for this would have been the 1980s, and there were a host of problems that decade.