Mark_fl

"I'm sure you're worth it, but that's out of my price range." is what I've said and nobody seemed offended.

My feeling is that if you don't want escorts responding to other people when they're with you, give them time.
Assume they're on a weekend call and will get back to you when they can.
Truth of course, is that they're probably not, and could respond when they have a minute, but this isn't life or death.
If you need an answer timely, I'd suggest letting them know, and maybe they could find a way to respond.

I don't think this rule has anything to do with xenophobia or the quality of service.  But 90% of our dissatisfaction, whether it be about services offered, agreed payments, or setting up meetings are directly related to failed communication. 
If someone doesn't clearly understand what I'm asking for or what our timing/plans are, it's a recipe for disaster. 

My feeling is that if you don't want escorts responding to other people when they're with you, give them time.
Assume they're on a weekend call and will get back to you when they can.
Truth of course, is that they're probably not, and could respond when they have a minute, but this isn't life or death.
If you need an answer timely, I'd suggest letting them know, and maybe they could find a way to respond.

My feeling is that if you don't want escorts responding to other people when they're with you, give them time.
Assume they're on a weekend call and will get back to you when they can.
Truth of course, is that they're probably not, and could respond when they have a minute, but this isn't life or death.
If you need an answer timely, I'd suggest letting them know, and maybe they could find a way to respond.

My feeling is that if you don't want escorts responding to other people when they're with you, give them time.
Assume they're on a weekend call and will get back to you when they can.
Truth of course, is that they're probably not, and could respond when they have a minute, but this isn't life or death.
If you need an answer timely, I'd suggest letting them know, and maybe they could find a way to respond.

Interesting take. But doesn't that also creep you out a little? I know you appreciate a regular,  but if you're the only one he sees, I'd think he might think there is more in the relationship than there really is. Good for your wallet, but could be trouble down the line.
Do most providers prefer being the ONLY provider (assuming the same income).

Fortunately didn't really have any in 2025. Had two disappointing experiences in 2023, got more selective and had no hirings in 2024.
In 2025, I have had two escort and one massage experience, and none were negative to the point of listing them here.

You've all seen 'em -- providers who offer a video, swinging their hips back and forth and thus making their semi-erect cock swing back and forth like a sophomore in the locker room. 
Sincere question:  is this a turn-on?  Encourage you to look more, or maybe engage?
(Not at all to me -- seems silly and not what I'm looking for in a provider, but I'm just one data point.)

I have always liked men in a certain age group - 30's to 40's. Now that I'm in my 70s i'm still attracted to those men, but they are now younger men rather than the mature men I used to relate to.  What has changed for me is that I used to be uncomfortable around men that are much younger  - 20's, but no longer.  I still like mature men, but those younger guys, wow!

RM sucks if they dont permanently bad those caught using stolen photos.

RM sucks if they dont permanently bad those caught using stolen photos.

Could be a few things:
1) They could be an idiot
2) they are trying to find out if there are some things not included in that published rate that might be on the table 
3) Most providers sadly put "ask" which shouldn't even be an option, so they don't bother clicking on rates any more. If everyone put a rate there,  this probably wouldn't happen.

I can't agree with this. Anything they say is included should be included, unless you are unsanitary. They are acting like they want to be there in the first place.  Chemistry schmemistry.

Fortunately didn't really have any in 2025. Had two disappointing experiences in 2023, got more selective and had no hirings in 2024.
In 2025, I have had two escort and one massage experience, and none were negative to the point of listing them here.

I can't agree with this. Anything they say is included should be included, unless you are unsanitary. They are acting like they want to be there in the first place.  Chemistry schmemistry.

I don't think it's generous guys that pay the Uber. It's rich guys or guys that can afford to lose it.
For me, trust goes both ways. I'm supposed to trust that he's not going to take my money and flake, but he's not going to trust me to be a real person? I'll talk on the phone or video chat to give him comfort, but I'm not paying for anything in advance, sorry.

Sorry, that's what I meant!

Interesting.  I wish there was a poll option, where you could state your age range and preferred provider ranges.

Interesting.  I wish there was a poll option, where you could state your age range and preferred provider ranges.

I never said I was being less selective. Actually my concern is that I won't be. So far I'm the same as ever.

Question for those of you hiring, or even just having encounters. Do you find that your tastes have expanded, or you've become less selective over time? 
With women I've been able to be attracted to women my age. But it seems with men I've only been attracted to a much younger specific type.
I feel this would preclude me from ever having an appropriate same sex relationship outside a financial one unless miraculously someone that much younger would find me attractive.
Has anyone else ever been in the same boat and have your tastes evolved over time?

RM sucks if they dont permanently bad those caught using stolen photos.

RM sucks if they dont permanently bad those caught using stolen photos.

Interesting.  I wish there was a poll option, where you could state your age range and preferred provider ranges.