Mark_fl

Not mine, but I do appreciate your obsession with me. Maybe you can go back and read all my posts again when you get lonely.

Wrong yet again (but I suppose you're getting used to it). Any professional is judged on the attributes required to do the job. The clients attributes to do the same job are completely irrelevant. In the case of an escort, this is physical attractiveness and ability to satisfy sexually. You've already declared that you missed the point and you will not change, but that doesn't make you any more correct.

Wrong again. The issue in the OP was that the provider specifically listed in a personal public account that he was not attracted to the characteristics of this particular client, and whether that should be a deterrent to hiring. And if that knowledge blows the illusion of mutual attraction.

I must have hit a nerve, because I said none of the things you mistakenly read into my post. Of course a provider can have standards. The could and SHOULD refuse service to anyone unsanitary or dangerous. But we were talking about the looks of providers and the looks of clients. Let's keep it apples to apples. Your examples are mostly ridiculous. A mechanic will just charge more for extra work done because of poor maintenance. But that is irrelevant. Were talking about whether it is fair for a provider to be judged on his appearance by those subjectivity less attractive than he is. Of course it's fair, because that's the business he chose. Trotting out comparisons that make no sense are reflections. But I'm sure I know one provider here who would applaud your rant.

It is not hypocrisy for critiquing someone for the value of what they are selling. If your accountant was bad at math, even if you were worse, wouldn't that be fair game? Do you critique a baseball player on your team that only hits .240 when you would be lucky to hit .050? Of course not to either. If you are out there selling your body for sex, it is 100% legitimate, even if unnecessary, to be critiqued for how you look.

Whatever you want it to be. Remember, we're paying for time, not sex acts.

I think the problem is that suspension of reality can only be possible under certain circumstances. I had a provider who had never seen me start calling me sexy shortly after we started communicating. Maybe some guys are into this and can start the fantasy, but for me it had me rolling my eyes. Yes, I want the fantasy that he's into me when we're together, but that seems a bit over the top. After we meet, if he acted interested when we were together, and told me how he was looking forward to seeing me again, or that he found something about me sexy, great. I can work with that. But if I read a profile of his where he said how much a hairy guy was a turnoff, for example, I would never be able to get into the fantasy that our relationship was mutually enjoyable or a real BFE. Of course I know it's not, but you just can't unring that bell. That said, I don't have any dating apps, so I'll never be in that situation, but I certainly see where the OP is coming from.

No reviews would be a red flag. Forbidding reviews would be a fluorescent, flashing, red and yellow flag the size of a billboard.

Im sure this guy is ideal for some, just not me, but what really gives me pause is the "no reviews policy" with the justification that "our private time is private". One way to make sure you don't get bad reviews, I suppose. https://rent.men/ThePerfectChoice

Perfect. Not a problem at all. I think it also changes the expectation. You sometimes feel like if someone doesn't answer a text fairly quickly, you're not that important. But nobody expects an immediate response from an email. As long as you move serious conversations to text or phone, I think it's ideal.

Maybe providers need to start taking Klarna

Fewer with regularity easily. While new can be exciting, I much prefer the BFE, which naturally would lean toward someone with whom you have some history. For me, I want relaxation and comfort level, not the stress that comes with a new encounter.

I think it's obvious that most providers wouldn't be with us for free. He'll, even if we're their exact type, they may not be willing to do just what we want them to do sexually without reciprocation in kind. I think the point is that if we find out the escort is an asshole, whether it be how he posts on grinder or how he treats a server in a restaurant, it would turn me off to hire.

A provider who is dealing or taking them is showing that he is willing to partake in risky behavior. Stay far, far away. And while alcohol can be just as dangerous, it is at least legal in moderation. I realize this whole hobby may be illegal in the US, but that doesn't mean we should combine it with illegal mind-altering substances.

Good advice above. One more piece from me. Your problem isn't your weight, it's your self-esteem. You aren't so big that you need to lead with it, or even point it out. Change your name to something that highlights something good about yourself, and enjoy!

I see both sides of this. Providers have every right to have preferences in the personal interactions. However, posting as he did ruins the illusion that he doesn't find some of his clients repulsive to him. I'm with you in that if he posted "no hairy guys" I would never hire him, knowing it wouldn't be something he was really into, even if his Rm ad said otherwise. It's his risk to take though. If he loses some business, so be it.

Not for me. No interest in that, sexting, private videos or zoom meetings. Does nothing for me except make me feel embarrassed for the performer and skeevy for myself. I wouldn't even ask a potential provider for additional pictures if I can see their face and body type. In person or not interested.

https://rentmasseur.com/MaxxxSportyy Anyone here have an encounter with this guy?

Idiotic ad. He's therapeutic only, don't ask for more. However he'll post a bunch of shirtless photos and of himself in just a towel. Sure. Sounds like a manipulative clown to me.

We don't want providers that are 10s. We want providers to delude us into thinking we are!

Yes. Or after the fact. Just unsolicited affection. Or for an overnight, if the provider would start up in the middle of the night, even waking me up, it would be beyond hot.

My point was more unsolicited initiating, not just during a massage or something.

For me, initiation of touch. If the provider just rubs my arm unsolicited or initiates a sexual encounter, it would make the experience feel so much more satisfying and like a real BFE.

I think in this context, most logical people mean mind-altering drugs. Certainly not OTC or drugs prescribed by a personal physician (that aren't mind-altering or being abused)

Glad to hear it Jamie. Good providers can deal with a forum and don't need to hide under a cloak of anonymity. We need more of you, not less.