Mark_fl

On what planet is that normal?

They are service providers, plain and simple. The service they provide is sometimes escorting, but more often something more intimate. I think "provider" is a very respectful term to use.

I really want the provider to have a good time and get off, so I will ask what they like and don't like, if there are any restrictions, etc. I don't want to make them uncomfortable...but I do want reciprocation, so I'll always want my turn;)

https://rent.men/ValentinoGray Cute guy. Has he been anywhere else? Any experiences with him?

I don't know about that. A better example might be giving a birthday present to another service provider, like your hair stylist, massage therapist or pool guy. Can certainly seem a little out of place and imply something that may not be the intent.

I don't even care if there's a dick Pic. As long as they have one that works. What I can about is a slim smooth body and humble demeanor.

If PhileasFogg is hiring him to suck your dick, he's truly a good friend.

People treat you how you allow yourself to be treated. If you want his services more than he wants your money, this will work out for you. If you cancel every time he's going to be late because you have other plans, he will either stop being late, or you will stop seeing him. Like you said, you're OK with it, so it works for both of you. If his communication is good, and he asks if it's OK, that's a different story, but if he was just late without communication, I'd just treat that as cancelation.

Are they hiring?

If I was ever going to graduate from being a side, I'm not now.

I've always wanted this, but not sure how to tactfully ask.

I would cut the cord with this guy. Not because he ended up canceling at the last minute. But because he didn't seem to be the slightest bit sorry about it, or what you might have done with your time. If I had to cancel, I would say I'm so sorry, xxxx happened and it was unavoidable. I hope to make it up to you. I wonder how this provider would have acted if you were meeting him at his place, called that you would be late and ended up canceling without explanation. I'd bet he wouldn't be booking you again.

Nice read. Very well-written! Thanks for sharing.

Is there a point in a provider telling us how good looking he is, or how muscular? I mean we see the pictures and can decide that for ourelves. I just saw an ad with the title "very good looking" at the top of the commentary. It's actually a bit of a turnoff, as it shows an ego. Obviously he was decent looking enough to click on in the first place. Is he going to talk me into thinking he's VERY good looking because he typed it? I was going to say I'd rather hear about his personality, but I guess I did. Maybe some guys are into that sort of ego, but didn't move me in the right way at all.

I hope it all came out ok.

I think this is normal. Often you can tell a bad review is the fault of the customer. All good reviews are generally the same, but a bad review tells you if there is a real problem. Was he late? No big deal. Things happen if there is only one such complaint. Pictures not accurate? Was it an old review? Maybe problem was fixed if not mentioned recently. Reviews are one guy's opinion. I won't disregard a provider for one review.

Not how it happened, but I find your obsession amusing. Another 4-star post. Well done.

The whole review system is silly. 5 should be top of the top. 3 should be meh. A 4 should be an above average rating. As it currently stands, the ratings are meaningless. When a 4 rating is an insult to the provider, the system is whack. Would be great if there was a 1-5 scale for several categories like a restaurant kiosk has. 1-5 for several categories: Looks like pictures Communication Timeliness Services as described Enthusiasm/attitude Cleanliness Price You should have to be registered to vote, and the providers would be allowed to similarly rate clients in a forum that only they could see: Appearance Cleanliness Generosity Communication Attitude Services only as requested in advance Or something like that. I shouldn't be afraid that a provider will be upset with a 4 rating. Maybe they should even be confidential (only visible to the RM site to verify legitimacy). It would also allow the client to decide if something that brought a rating down from 5 mattered to them at all.

Not mine, but I do appreciate your obsession with me. Maybe you can go back and read all my posts again when you get lonely.

Wrong yet again (but I suppose you're getting used to it). Any professional is judged on the attributes required to do the job. The clients attributes to do the same job are completely irrelevant. In the case of an escort, this is physical attractiveness and ability to satisfy sexually. You've already declared that you missed the point and you will not change, but that doesn't make you any more correct.

Wrong again. The issue in the OP was that the provider specifically listed in a personal public account that he was not attracted to the characteristics of this particular client, and whether that should be a deterrent to hiring. And if that knowledge blows the illusion of mutual attraction.

I must have hit a nerve, because I said none of the things you mistakenly read into my post. Of course a provider can have standards. The could and SHOULD refuse service to anyone unsanitary or dangerous. But we were talking about the looks of providers and the looks of clients. Let's keep it apples to apples. Your examples are mostly ridiculous. A mechanic will just charge more for extra work done because of poor maintenance. But that is irrelevant. Were talking about whether it is fair for a provider to be judged on his appearance by those subjectivity less attractive than he is. Of course it's fair, because that's the business he chose. Trotting out comparisons that make no sense are reflections. But I'm sure I know one provider here who would applaud your rant.

It is not hypocrisy for critiquing someone for the value of what they are selling. If your accountant was bad at math, even if you were worse, wouldn't that be fair game? Do you critique a baseball player on your team that only hits .240 when you would be lucky to hit .050? Of course not to either. If you are out there selling your body for sex, it is 100% legitimate, even if unnecessary, to be critiqued for how you look.

Whatever you want it to be. Remember, we're paying for time, not sex acts.

I think the problem is that suspension of reality can only be possible under certain circumstances. I had a provider who had never seen me start calling me sexy shortly after we started communicating. Maybe some guys are into this and can start the fantasy, but for me it had me rolling my eyes. Yes, I want the fantasy that he's into me when we're together, but that seems a bit over the top. After we meet, if he acted interested when we were together, and told me how he was looking forward to seeing me again, or that he found something about me sexy, great. I can work with that. But if I read a profile of his where he said how much a hairy guy was a turnoff, for example, I would never be able to get into the fantasy that our relationship was mutually enjoyable or a real BFE. Of course I know it's not, but you just can't unring that bell. That said, I don't have any dating apps, so I'll never be in that situation, but I certainly see where the OP is coming from.