Asterisk
-
Posts
209 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
Asterisk got a reaction from DBWEHO in This Sexy Frenchman Is Cumming To My Town.https://es.rent.men/HunkbcnXXL
1 review in 6 years?
-
Asterisk reacted to Jim_n_NYC in NYC Recommendations & 411
INHO, someone who uses fake pics AND requires a deposit should not be promoted in these forums.
-
Asterisk reacted to Rudynate in 411 on Chris Daniel in NYC
I was wondering about that. He must have an account at the local lab.
-
Asterisk reacted to LookingAround in 411 on Chris Daniel in NYC
Lol. That’s some blood test you did. Haha
-
Asterisk reacted to Truth in 411 on Chris Daniel in NYC
I am very confident in saying that Chris Daniel has no STD or STI. I am also very confident in stating he is negative for both forms of herpes HSV-1 and HSV-2. After the weekend I spent with him, I can say Chris is very clean, discrete, and drug/disease free.
-
Asterisk reacted to + nycman in 411 on Chris Daniel in NYC
And BOTH of you decided to create brand new profiles...
just to come here and tell us how incredible Chris is.....
Welcome to the forums.....Chris.
Stupid...we are not.
-
Asterisk reacted to pubic_assistance in 411 on Chris Daniel in NYC
Cold sores are not always visible on the outside of the skin. Ulcers inside the mouth are most common and yes, completely transmittable. I am sure some escorts take this into account.
-
Asterisk reacted to Mount N Do in 411 on Chris Daniel in NYC
I had contact with him recently here in Miami. Unfortunately we couldn't work out the schedule, and I absolutely inquired about kissing. His response was affirmative without conditions. He did have a vague idea of what I look like so I'm not sure if that factored. I have real nice teeth.
-
Asterisk reacted to BtmBearDad in Review or Not Review
I’m of two minds with this one. I would agree with the others, and say don’t review, move on, you’ll never see him again. But then I also think of fellow hobbyists who would appreciate an honest review.
No need to trash him in any review - a simple “YMMV” review would do the trick. Start with the positives - easy to communicate with, nice guy, looked like his pics, other reviewers attested to his talents, etc.; then address the negatives - wouldn’t kiss, seemed disengaged/going thru the motions, advised couldn’t cum as he jo’d earlier, ended 2-hour booking early. Overall a disappointing session. While you understand everyone has off days, and he may have been 5 stars with others, he wasn’t with you.
I think we all use info we gather here, and on RM, from other RM reviewers to help our decisions on whether to engage or not. Whether you decide to review or not is down to you. I 100% understand not wanting a confrontation but I don’t view a review as a confrontation. Even if you don’t submit a RM review, you should think about adding the provider’s link here as a heads up.
Just my two cents.
BBD
PS: for some reason I thought BlessedBoy had moved on/retired, and I’d missed my chance. Glad to read that doesn’t appear to be the case 👍🏻
-
Asterisk reacted to LA90046 in I offended a provider on a hookup site
No offense, but I cannot imagine any context where the question "I had the impression that you are a sex worker" would be well-received.
-
Asterisk reacted to BtmBearDad in Opining on the appearance of escorts
It’s not unreasonable at all for hobbyists to judge providers based on our likes/preferences. It’s the manner in which it’s done that’s issue.
The OP asked for feedback on this particular provider - totally normal. What I think is unnecessary is when other hobbyists chime in -when they have no experience with the provider, and have no intention to engage them - picking apart the provider’s body, appearance AND talking down to hobbyists about our choices, about how this must be the best we can hope to get, AND THEN proceeds to go on about how sexy, hot they are. It’s just so condescending, so patronizing, and so unnecessary.
Now if someone asks for feedback on a provider, and a hobbyist replies they’ve engaged them, and the pictures are out of date, the body is not what the pics show, etc. that’s different.
The former is rude, the latter is informative.
How many times have I opened a “411” thread, clicked the link, and seen a provider that’s not my type, that I don’t think is attractive? Plenty. But I don’t add a comment to the thread expressing any of that, or any faults I find with his appearance, or any judgement I have for hobbyists who go for that type. I just close the thread, and move on. That’s how this is supposed to work.
Just my two cents. I will add a third cent - in anonymous forums when people start talking about how worldly they are, how well heeled they are, how desirable, hot, and sexy they are, my experience has been chances are, they’re none of the above.
BBD
-
Asterisk reacted to pubic_assistance in 411 on Stefanogv in NYC
You know what's really toxic ? Woke condescending attitude toward perfectly normal behavior.
-
Asterisk reacted to alexslaveboy in 411 on Stefanogv in NYC
If this is FAT then I guess I need new glasses!!!
-
Asterisk got a reaction from KK913 in LIAMV / INDIANAPOLIS
IMHO, booking fees are unreasonable for Ticketmaster and other rentseekers who don't provide benefit but extract a cost. I'd skip any ad like that. (And recommend using a spamfilter; zero sympathy for the modern ills we all share.)
-
Asterisk reacted to Wanderoz in Zach in Vegas?
So many guys use pics 10 years old or more. It's very annoying...and bad business. They should bill themselves as Vintage Escorts.
-
-
Asterisk got a reaction from TorontoDrew in LIAMV / INDIANAPOLIS
IMHO, booking fees are unreasonable for Ticketmaster and other rentseekers who don't provide benefit but extract a cost. I'd skip any ad like that. (And recommend using a spamfilter; zero sympathy for the modern ills we all share.)
-
Asterisk reacted to Skip in 411 on PatriqueBrasil in DC
Met him today. Sweet guy, not so much English. The pictures aren't necessarily old, just let's say he was at his peak then and may have lost alot of that edge. Willing, reasonable, but not a repeat. Better at his escort duties than massage. PM for details if you like.
-
Asterisk reacted to + azdr0710 in How come no one knows about this guy?
pictures are from a 2015 photo shoot of a Brazilian model with initials GM......IGs come up with similarly named Brazilians, but not the same person.....also, a AAA Brazilian baseball player with same name in the US is not the same......
that's all I got!
-
Asterisk reacted to rvwnsd in 411 on AlejandroMIL
$800 per hour? That guy? It is an exorbitant rate for anyone but this escort in particular strikes me as a $175/hour mintboys special.
-
Asterisk reacted to Harryinny in ThickMuscle in NYC - 411
Cute boy, "thick" is a tad exaggerated though.
-
Asterisk reacted to Epigonos in LucaUK - West Hollywood
I have to wonder if this guy is really serious. He has 82 photos posted on rentmen and all he shows is a bare torso. In all those photos NOT one ass or cock shot. REALLY!!!!!
-
Asterisk reacted to jeezifonly in LucaUK - West Hollywood
I have a feeling that his time in front of a mirror means more to him than time on the clock looking at me…
-
Asterisk reacted to + purplekow in New ad, hunky Italian -- anyone with the 411
Oh I thought you were looking for someone who was attractive to you.
-