Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just asking but if they only fuck the client and not each other, where is the incest? 
 

The grey area would be if they dp the client. Omg their dicks might touch each other but again, who is getting fucked?

And then there is always spit roasting. At least 3 feet away from each other. 😂 

Posted
On 7/14/2025 at 11:32 AM, Peter Eater said:

Incest is so unappealing.

But it is indeed fascinating to hear at what people living in glass houses choose to cast their stones when the other choices floating around in the foreground include the "unappealingness" of capitalism, homosexuality, unequal power dynamics, sex trafficking, false disclosure of health status, poverty, high cost of higher education, lack of basic income programs, body dysmorphic disorder, abuse of plastic surgery, steroid abuse, drug abuse...

Posted

Brother doesn't necessarily mean a sibling, in the biological sense.    It can also refer to a close male friend or a member of the same group, like a fraternity brother. In a familial context, a brother is someone with whom you share a deep bond, often forged through shared experiences and a sense of mutual support. 

African-american men often refer to each other as brothers.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
11 hours ago, pubic_assistance said:

The bias against incest is only about heterosexuals who risk producing deformed babies. Gay twins can fuck each other's brains out with no worries. 

That is true for you and the twins who read your post. But alas, for the twins who have not read your post there will be yeas of PTSD, hysterical weeping, and disfiguring embarrassment, particularly after they watch the Ryan Murphy dramatization of their life stories. 

Posted
5 hours ago, CuriousByNature said:

The taboo is also rooted in social and psychological reasoning. 

And yes, it's the same "social and psychological reasoning" that explains why homosexuality, women working outside the home, abortion, and freeing the slaves are taboo.

Posted
16 hours ago, Walt said:

That is true for you and the twins who read your post. But alas, for the twins who have not read your post there will be yeas of PTSD, hysterical weeping, and disfiguring embarrassment, particularly after they watch the Ryan Murphy dramatization of their life stories. 

That certainly doesn't happen in places where incest is normal like Appalachia and the Bible belt! 

Posted
2 hours ago, Walt said:

And yes, it's the same "social and psychological reasoning" that explains why homosexuality, women working outside the home, abortion, and freeing the slaves are taboo.

No, I have to disagree with the comparison.  In addition to the biological issues of birth defects, from a social and psychological perspective, incest has generally been taboo for millennia because it can create significant breaks in familial bonds, leaving family units more vulnerable in times of hardship.  The sibling bond that starts at a very young age has tended to render siblings sexually unattractive to each other, thereby fostering a stronger kinship loyalty across generations.  While this psychological aspect of aspect may have an evolutionary impetus - acting as an additional safeguard against inbreeding - it is more likely environmental, since siblings raised separately and without knowledge of one another may be more likely to have a mutual attraction than siblings raised knowing one another.   

 

Posted
54 minutes ago, CuriousByNature said:

taboo for millennia because it can create significant breaks in familial bonds, leaving family units more vulnerable in times of hardship. 

Gee. Just like women working outside the home.

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, pubic_assistance said:

Very cute.

I meant is it "wrong" for two male cousins to fuck or is the puritanical judgement you speak of reserved for gay brothers ? 

There's nothing puritanical nor judgemental in what I said.  Two consenting adults can do what they want.  All I said is that there are other reasons why incest has become taboo in most communities over the millennia.  It isn't just about inbreeding and potential birth defects.  Traditional societies have strong ties of kinship that follow certain parameters - and this predates our knowledge of genetics by a very, very long time. 

Edited by CuriousByNature
Posted
2 hours ago, CuriousByNature said:

I'm not sure why you seem fixated on this.  My comment has nothing to do with gender roles.  I'm looking way, way back in the history of communities - long before there was an employment based economy.

I am only fixated on the idea that "social and psychological reasoning" coming from "way back in the history of communities" is a horribly reactionary and  irrational way to evaluate, justify. and/or condemn human behavior. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...