any updates on the now infamous Austin Wolf?

[+ BOZO T CLOWN]

On 6/17/2025 at 11:45 PM, pubic_assistance said:

Does anyone know if hes still with his husband ? 

Gant's Linkedin page shows that he moved back to Missouri at the end of 2024 (which explains why he didn't show up for Wolf's guilty plea last week). He worked for Mercedes-Benz in suburban St. Louis for a while. His LinkedIn now indicates that he is "OpenToWork".
Gant acted as Wolf's consigliere. In addition to being Wolf's husband, Gant did publicity, marketing, and was his chief advisor.
Now that Gant's husband/cash cow will be incarcerated for 10 years to life, it appears that Gant has moved on to a simpler life, out of the limelight.....

BTC
🤡

 

[pubic_assistance]

On 6/29/2025 at 6:21 PM, BOZO T CLOWN said:

Now that Gant's husband/cash cow will be incarcerated for 10 years to life, it appears that Gant has moved on to a simpler life, out of the limelight.....

He reached out to me recently and said hes on his way back to New York. 

[caliguy]

If they really had that kind of a close working relationship together Austin would've had the powers of Houdini to hide that from him.

[kingsley88]

Just catching up. There will definitely be jail time but I guess we'll know on Sept 9th on how many years. Some folks on here thought he was taking steroids so if he did, I'd imagine he probably looks thinner/smalller nowadays.

[+ Gar1eth]

On 6/20/2025 at 7:38 PM, pubic_assistance said:

I actually DID like him. 

I never watched his porn (I dont watch a lot of porn to begin with). But I used to hire his husband on a regular basis. Justin was often there. Always a pleasant and upbeat kind of fellow. So.... unlike all the gentlemen here who have nothing but disgust for the fellow ..I do recall the HUMAN BEING who I spent several joyful conversations with and who SEEMED a perfectly nice fellow. For me it only sad to discover his demons led him down some unfortunate pathways that were morally questionable and definitely illegal. I feel bad for him.

Which husband or partner was that? He's had several. 

[pubic_assistance]

3 hours ago, Gar1eth said:

Which husband or partner was that? He's had several. 

His professional name is Atlas Gant 

 

[+ Gar1eth]

9 hours ago, Gar1eth said:

Which husband or partner was that? He's had several. 

 

5 hours ago, pubic_assistance said:

His professional name is Atlas Gant 

 

What a handsome guy!! You have extremely good taste, @pubic_assistance

 

I wonder what ever happened to one of his previous boyfriends or husbands-Tyler?  I never met him, but he was really handsome too. 

[+ BOZO T CLOWN]

Austin Wolf and his husband, Steven Gant

BTC
🤡

[pubic_assistance]

3 hours ago, Gar1eth said:

You have extremely good taste, @pubic_assistance

Thank you. Everyone's taste is different. For MY part, young, cute and fit is my focus. "Atlas" was always charming, polite.... and an absolute dirty bottom pig in the bedroom. (All wonderful qualities in a man.) 

Edited August 6 by pubic_assistance
grammar

[+ Gar1eth]

4 hours ago, Gar1eth said:

 

What a handsome guy!! You have extremely good taste, @pubic_assistance

 

 

 

1 hour ago, pubic_assistance said:

Thank you. Everyone's taste is different. For MY part, young, cute and fit is my focus. "Atlas" was always charming, polite.... and an absolute dirty bottom pig in the bedroom. (All wonderful qualities in a man.) 

My type is definitely cute ( or handsome) and muscular/ very fit although they don't  necessarily need to be 'young'. In fact mid 30's is great for me. But there is definitely a broad overlap in our tastes. 
 

 I may however differ from a lot of people on here. I usually characterize my sexual experiences for the most part (with I guess an occasional exception 😈  😈) much like Miss Mona does in "Best Little Whorehouse In Texas"-there's lots of goodwill (I hope) and maybe one small thrill (I DEFINITELY HOPE); but there ain't nothing too terribly dirty going on. 

Edited August 6 by Gar1eth

[pubic_assistance]

33 minutes ago, Gar1eth said:

I may however differ from a lot of people on here. I usually characterize my sexual experiences for the most part ...much like Miss Mona does in "Best Little Whorehouse In Texas"-there's lots of goodwill ..and maybe one small thrill ...but there ain't nothing too terribly dirty going on. 

Nah...I like it down n dirty when I'm with a same-sex partner. THAT is part of my attraction to men. They are far more inclined to enjoy a rough pig fucking than most women do.

I like providers who know how to do "naughty". Obviously "Austin" Wolfe's b.f. would be well familiar with the down-n-dirty. I just had no idea that Wolfe himself had such a disturbing dark-side to his "naughty". No idea if his partner was aware of what he was doing or if he turned a blind eye to it.

 

[dutchal]

https://rentmen.eu/ApexAss

[+ BOZO T CLOWN]

8 hours ago, dutchal said:

https://rentmen.eu/ApexAss

He's been on Rentmen for 7 years? Bozo has never noticed him before.

His RM ad states his age as 30 years old. But according to his LinkedIn account, he worked at the St. Louis Opera House as a wardrobe and makeup technician in 2010. Assuming he wasn't a 15-year old employee of the St. Louis Opera House, he is much closer to 40 years old than 30. 
Nevertheless, his body is amazing.... 

Bozo would love to know the price of spending an hour with Austin Wolf's hubby.
Anyone?

BTC
🤡

 

[CardioKing]

On 6/20/2025 at 1:28 PM, BOZO T CLOWN said:

BREAKING NEWS:

 

Bozo attended today's hearing at Federal Court. Sadly, the only ones in the gallery were Bozo and a female reporter from the NY Post. No husband, no family, no friends, no ex-fans, and no Austin Wolf groupies. Wolf must have asked his hubby and family to stay away. Bozo knows why..... The government dropped a bombshell. They were/are about to charge Wolf with the additional charge of enticing a minor for sex. This is a far more serious charge than the original charges of possession, receipt, and distribution of child pornography.

Wolf entered the courtroom looking noticeably less muscular than in the past. He looked well fed, but his face and body seemed puffy/chubby. He was wearing a baggy tan prison jumpsuit, but he was clearly less buffed than the Austin Wolf we all knew. He was also clean shaven. Bozo had never seen him with a smooth face before. The chubby, clean shaven face made him look much younger than 44 - almost boyish, even sympathetic. He was handcuffed and shackled at his wrists and ankles. He was looking down at the floor as he was being led to his seat. 

The proceedings began with a lot of legal discussion between the judge and the attorneys.  When they finally got down to the charges, Wolf pled (or is it pleaded?) guilty to the one count of "enticement of a minor (15-years old) for oral sex".  In exchange, the government agreed to drop, or at least set aside, the other charges. The judge explained that with a guilty plea, Wolf will face a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years + 5 years supervised probation. Maximum sentence is life. The federal sentencing guidelines call for a sentence of 188 months - 235 months for this crime; however, the judge has the discretion to sentence Wolf from anywhere between the 10-year mandatory minimum to the maximum of life in prison. There was also a fine, and forfeiture of certain assets.
Wolf will also have to register as a sex offender. 

At the point where the judge asked Wolf to explain why he was guilty, Wolf started to read a statement (likely written by his attorneys) - contacting the minor, engaging in the act, etc., Wolf broke down and started crying uncontrollably.

The actual sentencing will take place on September 29th. Between now and then, there will be a report from the Department of Probation, and both sides will make their written arguments to the judge on suggestions for sentencing.

If the judge follows the sentencing guidelines, Wolf will be around 60 or more when he is released.

BTC aka Jimmy Olsen, clown-cub reporter
🤡

 

WOW > I never noticed your post until now > EXCELLENT first-hand reporting which covers all the key questions most of us would have > THANKS for the superb Court appearance summary! While we'll find out the specific prison sentence later next month, from my own research it would be highly unusual for the judge to impose a life sentence > so assuming he very likely sticks within the Federal sentencing guidelines, my own prediction be 13.5 years + 5 years supervised probation > 85% of that 13.5 year / 162 month Federal sentence must be served before parole eligibility which would potentially reduce it to 138 months / 11.5 years MINUS roughly 15 months already served (June/2024-Sept 2025) > Meaning he'll be required to still serve a minimum 123 months behind bars / 10.3 years + 5 years supervised probation upon release > Any thoughts / counter-sentence predictions? THANKS again for your highly informative first-hand reporting!

[+ SirBillybob]

3 hours ago, CardioKing said:

WOW > I never noticed your post until now > EXCELLENT first-hand reporting which covers all the key questions most of us would have > THANKS for the superb Court appearance summary! While we'll find out the specific prison sentence later next month, from my own research it would be highly unusual for the judge to impose a life sentence > so assuming he very likely sticks within the Federal sentencing guidelines, my own prediction be 13.5 years + 5 years supervised probation > 85% of that 13.5 year / 162 month Federal sentence must be served before parole eligibility which would potentially reduce it to 138 months / 11.5 years MINUS roughly 15 months already served (June/2024-Sept 2025) > Meaning he'll be required to still serve a minimum 123 months behind bars / 10.3 years + 5 years supervised probation upon release > Any thoughts / counter-sentence predictions? THANKS again for your highly informative first-hand reporting!

So, a run-on sentence. My specialty.

Edited yesterday at 10:58 AM by SirBillybob

[+ SirBillybob]

For 2422(b) I thought it would be 10 to life, with upward variance from mandatory minimum 10 according to aggravating factors and downward variance from option of life according to mitigating factors, so I wouldn’t hazard a guess. 

It’s also actually unclear to me if in-person sexual interaction occurred between the age-15 minor and Smith and/or a third party. And I believe that is a state charge never imposed. That (if) it did transpire seems to me to be an aggravating factor (Smith losing points) for sentencing as proxy for unimposed sexual assault charges, and that (if) it didn’t it seems to me that it would not be a mitigating factor (gaining points) because it would be absurd to imply it’s commendable to not having fucked the minor whose intended enticed role established by Smith was to be fucked.

I gather the guilty plea is a mitigating factor but I suspect it does not yield downward sentencing variance from 10 but could yield downward variance from life. To me, it seems there are layers of cart-horse variables and I don’t know the algorithmic sequencing of such factors.

Edited yesterday at 12:37 PM by SirBillybob

[pubic_assistance]

On 8/8/2025 at 6:15 PM, BOZO T CLOWN said:

He's been on Rentmen for 7 years?

I hired him the first time, some 8 or more years ago. I do seem to remember him having a MASSAGE profile on one of the apps. I had originally hired him for massage, but he offered additional sexual services after developing a friendly professional relationship. He was a hungry bottom boy who can take a good pounding. Just MY type. Outside of the dirty-pig-sex in the bedroom he's got a very sweet Midwestern US personality. Unfortunately he's older now and appears to have been juicing with a lot of steroids. (my opinion)  I'm guessing he's somewhere around 40. Not really attractive to me any more. So unlikely to be hiring him again. 

[CardioKing]

5 hours ago, SirBillybob said:

For 2422(b) I thought it would be 10 to life, with upward variance from mandatory minimum 10 according to aggravating factors and downward variance from option of life according to mitigating factors, so I wouldn’t hazard a guess. 

It’s also actually unclear to me if in-person sexual interaction occurred between the age-15 minor and Smith and/or a third party. And I believe that is a state charge never imposed. That (if) it did transpire seems to me to be an aggravating factor (Smith losing points) for sentencing as proxy for unimposed sexual assault charges, and that (if) it didn’t it seems to me that it would not be a mitigating factor (gaining points) because it would be absurd to imply it’s commendable to not having fucked the minor whose intended enticed role established by Smith was to be fucked.

I gather the guilty plea is a mitigating factor but I suspect it does not yield downward sentencing variance from 10 but could yield downward variance from life. To me, it seems there are layers of cart-horse variables and I don’t know the algorithmic sequencing of such factors.

THANKS > this is exactly the type of detailed, highly relevant information I've been looking for online here!

[+ SirBillybob]

48 minutes ago, CardioKing said:

THANKS > this is exactly the type of detailed, highly relevant information I've been looking for online here!

https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/guidelines-manual/2021/GLMFull.pdf

Edited 18 hours ago by SirBillybob

[+ SirBillybob]

Base offense level 28 is up to 8 years sentence with lowest rank of criminal history, and criminal history hierarchy can escalate sentence length but I think his rank is I (lowest). 

Offense level points can be added to 28 according to Part G commencing page 204, but I don’t think he meets the criteria for many more offense points. That said, perhaps computer use in the crime as a factor adds about 2 years due to offense level rise to level 30, so it seems that is consistent (coincidentally?) with the mandatory min of 10 years. I think it’s the add-on points to 28 that are the unknown.

I might bet on 7-10 years minus time served, then probation, the factor of sentence serve proportionality for parole/ probation eligibility you mentioned, and cash fine. 

My take with a big side of:

Edited 17 hours ago by SirBillybob

[+ BOZO T CLOWN]

1 minute ago, SirBillybob said:

Base offense level 28 is up to 8 years sentence with lowest rank of criminal history, and criminal history hierarchy can escalate sentence length but I think his rank is I (lowest). 

Offense level points can be added to 28 according to Part G commencing page 204, but I don’t think he meets the criteria for many more offense points. That said, perhaps computer use adds about 2 years due to level rise to level 30, so it seems that is consistent (coincidentally?) with the mandatory min of 10 years. 

I might bet on 7-10 years minus time served, then probation, the factor of sentence serve proportionality for probation eligibility you mentioned, and cash fine. 

We'll know the actual sentence in about 7 weeks. Bozo will try to attend the courtroom proceedings personally as a special COM correspondent. Who issues Bozo his press pass? One of the forum moderators? 
Meanwhile @SirBillybob, any news on Yan-Philippe Leduc?

BTC
🤡
 

[CardioKing]

2 hours ago, SirBillybob said:

Base offense level 28 is up to 8 years sentence with lowest rank of criminal history, and criminal history hierarchy can escalate sentence length but I think his rank is I (lowest). 

Offense level points can be added to 28 according to Part G commencing page 204, but I don’t think he meets the criteria for many more offense points. That said, perhaps computer use in the crime as a factor adds about 2 years due to offense level rise to level 30, so it seems that is consistent (coincidentally?) with the mandatory min of 10 years. I think it’s the add-on points to 28 that are the unknown.

I might bet on 7-10 years minus time served, then probation, the factor of sentence serve proportionality for parole/ probation eligibility you mentioned, and cash fine. 

My take with a big side of:

Appreciate this follow-up information "Sir" > thanks again for sharing! "Mr Bozo" and yourself have hands-down provided the BEST information regarding this specific case! My own confusion stems from reading he agreed to a plea deal involving "minimum 10 years to life" > so it would never occur to me that any Federal Judge could actually go lower than 10 years when he announces his actual sentence later next month > minus time served + fines + 5 years probation after serving his time

[+ SirBillybob]

3 minutes ago, CardioKing said:

Appreciate this follow-up information "Sir" > thanks again for sharing! "Mr Bozo" and yourself have hands-down provided the BEST information regarding this specific case! My own confusion stems from reading he agreed to a plea deal involving "minimum 10 years to life" > so it would never occur to me that any Federal Judge could actually go lower than 10 years when he announces his actual sentence later next month > minus time served + fines + 5 years probation after serving his time

I think there are cases of crimes like this,  viewed as egregious, when circumstances result in the convicted man to be released into the care of a responsible parent. That’s an outlier of course, but even rigidified-seeming guidelines are shiftable.