Jump to content

This Judge Disrobes on OF and gets kicked off bench


BtmBearDad
Message added by rvwnsd,

Folks let's remain on the topic of now-former Judge Locke. 

Thank you

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, Unicorn said:

Yes, although, realistically, I don't think one can get any subscribers on OnlyFans without showing one's face. Ain't gonna happen.

I agree with you on that. There is only one guy I can think of off the top of my head that I'd subscribe to that doesn't show his face. Anonbttmmia always has some hot vids:

https://onlyfans.com/anonbttmmia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kingsley88 said:

I've seen him around at Fire Island.

I *knew* someone on here must at least recognise him!

When the story broke, the texts were fast and furious among my NYC lawyers friends, and my politico friends lol 

Funny enough while many admit that they know him now, there’s a number who are very reticent to say how well they “know” him 😝At the other end, one guy in the group text -hot early thirties Wall St jock bruh type- had no problem going into chapter and verse on what they did, where, and when! 

Did your group interact with him and his house much? Or was it the typical FI thing - knowing them from seeing around, but don’t know them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, BuffaloKyle said:

I agree with you on that. There is only one guy I can think of off the top of my head that I'd subscribe to that doesn't show his face. Anonbttmmia always has some hot vids:

https://onlyfans.com/anonbttmmia

There are a few of the tops that keep their faces cropped out of their vids, but in fairness, their faces aren’t bringing in the punters! 😜

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, FrankR said:

I will never understand why we, the general public, enjoy sticking our noses into other people’s business. Or feel qualified to criticize what they do in their free time. Social media has made it worse. As long as he isnt hurting anyone…how about we all just mind our own business. 🤔

I'm not sure if you read the string carefully. The former judge actually wrote to his mayor, telling them to "Suck my c--t" (chest?) and to "choke on a dick." I doubt any one of us would ever do that. Is this a person you want on the bench, using taxpayer money? Making a public scene begs for public comment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BuffaloKyle said:

I agree with you on that. There is only one guy I can think of off the top of my head that I'd subscribe to that doesn't show his face. Anonbttmmia always has some hot vids:

https://onlyfans.com/anonbttmmia

It sounds like you "would" subscribe, but haven't. And at $6/mo, I doubt he's raking in the $$. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kingsley88 said:

It's crazy! I've seen him around at Fire Island....

Maybe this summer you'll see him in Fired Island... 😄

You are fired! - Meet the man who fired 900 employees in one zoom call! |  The Economic Times

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, RadioRob said:

For me it’s not one or the other.  You either have good judgement or you don’t.  With all of the info given with his side hustles and social media posting, he’s shown he does not have good judgment which is something we expect as a standard for our judicial officers. 

"Finance officials did not respond to questions about how he was vetted for the job."

Perhaps he was blackmailing the financial officials who "vetted" him with blowjobs?

With his sense of judgment, I wouldn't be surprised. 😇

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BOZO T CLOWN said:

chest? I doubt it.

More likely a 4-letter word that rhymes with punt.

BoZo

It didn't look like he was a trans man who hasn't had bottom surgery. I'm wondering what he could mean by suck my c*nt (or c*it)?? ;)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a long time he wasn’t showing his face on his OF, and kept separate Twitter accounts.  But he became “sloppy” after he left a law firm and started his own legal practice. 
 

Lawyers have long been subject to “character and fitness” requirements that go beyond just not doing anything illegal.  Regardless of whether firing him is fair or not, it was foreseeable.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as an aside, I posted the story because I thought it was a funny, if idiotic, example of some men who show no judgement when it comes to making private activities public. But I have to say I’m surprised at the number of posts here defending this gent for what he engages in during his “private life”. News flash - his or anyone’s twitter and OF/JFF are not what anyone could deem “private”. I’m actually wondering what type of companies/firms some work at where this type of public behaviour would not be grounds for termination 🤷🏼‍♂️

To be clear, I’m not judging or condemning him for what he does engage in, but rather I’m just chuckling over his clear lack of judgement, and what it cost him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kingsley88 said:

Any non-managerial work remote job that is not client-facing.

Remote or in office, client facing or back office, all it takes is one person to find your Twitter, OF/JFF, and bring it to the attention of management.

If you’re going to engage in this  type of side hustle and/or tweet about your boss, and others as he did, you need to make damn sure you’re taking precautions to make sure none of it can be traced back to you. If not, and you behave as cavalierly as this guy did, don’t be surprised if you’re shown the office door. 

Doesn’t matter that we live in NYC, it really is a small gay world 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kingsley88 said:

have never seen their face

Same these last 3 years - unless I knew them before, or they’ve been on a call, they’re just a name on an email address. So like you, if they had an OF/JFF, I wouldn’t have a clue! Now if we’re going to talk about who at work we may wish has an OF/JFF, that’s a different story! 😜

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Bozo predicted, the process for disbarment has begun:

https://nypost.com/2023/03/26/onlyfans-judge-gregory-a-locke-parties-in-vegas-as-nyc-councilwoman-calls-for-his-disbarment/

NYC Councilwoman Vickie Paladino, who was told by Judge Locke that she should, "Choke on a d--k", previously stated:

“This city must have absolute faith in its courts at every level, and employing individuals like Mr. Locke in positions of legal authority only corrodes the people’s trust in the professionalism and impartiality of our institutions.”

She is now pushing for disbarment: “This guy should lose his law license, we’re in the process.”

We know that disbarment will prevent him from practicing law in New York state, but will it also effect his ability to practice law in other states? If yes, Judge Locke should cash in on his 15 minutes of fame....now. Strike while the iron is hot.
He should sign a lucrative contract with a porn studio, make personal appearances at gay clubs, and even write an autobiography (with lots of photos). Maybe even a movie-of-the-week?

BoZo

 

Edited by BOZO T CLOWN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, BOZO T CLOWN said:

NYC Councilwoman Vickie Paladino, who was told by Judge Locke that she should, "Choke on a d--k", previously stated:

Dick choking is a very serious subject. Who among us has not choked on a dick?  At least I wasn’t as unlucky as her…https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/man-murder-girlfriend-choke-death-penis-size-oral-sex-richard-henry-patterson-margate-florida-show-jury-size-a7728831.html?amp

Edited by Stormy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I align with the group that doesn't care that he had an OnlyFans or told Vicky Paladino off. She's a monster and utterly corrupt, as are most politicians. 

For me, unless they can demonstrate that he did something wrong in his job, his comments about politicians and his OF is irrelevant. And as people who engage with sex workers, I think we should stand up for them when a bunch of hypocritical douche bags attack them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, KensingtonHomo said:

I align with the group that doesn't care that he had an OnlyFans or told Vicky Paladino off. She's a monster and utterly corrupt, as are most politicians. 

For me, unless they can demonstrate that he did something wrong in his job, his comments about politicians and his OF is irrelevant. And as people who engage with sex workers, I think we should stand up for them when a bunch of hypocritical douche bags attack them. 

That’s a perfect world, and as we all know, not the real world we live in. 

It doesn’t matter whether one agrees or disagrees with his tweets - they were ad hominem attacks directed at his boss (Adams), and part of his management (Paladino). That’s grounds for termination at most companies/firms. 

NY is an employment at will state, so any employer can terminate an employee for any reason, or no reason. Government employees are also subject to moral/ethical standards, and most firms have some sort of moral clause in their employment contracts, all of which allows for the employee to be terminated for violations. 

Again, I’m not shaming or judging him for his political opinions or for his side hustle. I’m judging him for his colossal lack of judgement by letting his private life bleed into his professional life. Honestly, as a member of the bar, he of all people should have known how this could, and did, play out. Like the meteorologist, he was not being “sex positive”, he was being stupid, period. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BtmBearDad said:

Government employees are also subject to moral/ethical standards, and most firms have some sort of moral clause in their employment contracts, all of which allows for the employee to be terminated for violations. 

I don't think what he did was wise, given the world we do live in. But I don't think public employees should have to give up their right to criticize an elected official simply because they're employed by the city or state. SCOTUS doesn't have an ethical or moral standard. If it did, most of the justices couldn't pass it. 

So for me, it's less about the administrative state and more about power differentials that favor the lap dogs of capital over working people. 

And in terms of Erick Adame (the meteorologist), from what I've read from him he was dealing with a form of sex addiction. I think that deserves care, not termination. I was completely unaware of what he was up to until he was fired. So why wouldn't the company handle it privately, let him go get help and come back to work? Well, because the company is owned by homophobic right-wingers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...