Jump to content
This topic is 2159 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

I am a strictly top client and lean heavily towards the Dom end of things (not necessarily kink, but def. in charge); I click best with Subs or submissive bottoms.

When searching escorts, I generally exclude guys who list as Vers/Top, my interpretation of Verse/Top is "will bottom if I really have to".

I find chemistry is best when the yin to my yang WANTS to be in the bottom bunk, craves it, loves the role they are playing, the sensation, and serving.

Is my outlook here too limited?

I'm not running out of opportunities BTW by limiting my search.....

Thanks,

Jack

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Hello,

I am a strictly top client and lean heavily towards the Dom end of things (not necessarily kink, but def. in charge); I click best with Subs or submissive bottoms.

When searching escorts, I generally exclude guys who list as Vers/Top, my interpretation of Verse/Top is "will bottom if I really have to".

I find chemistry is best when the yin to my yang WANTS to be in the bottom bunk, craves it, loves the role they are playing, the sensation, and serving.

Is my outlook here too limited?

I'm not running out of opportunities BTW by limiting my search.....

Thanks,

Jack

 

Not limited, you know what you like and you're paying for it!

 

You want someone who can really take it like a man, right?

 

Besides some escorts find easier to bottom others prefer to top. A frequent poster on here constantly complains about tops "Why doesn't he bottom?" Keep on hiring bottoms or vers! Some guys for instance won't hire someone who is a vers/top, they only hire TOPS.

Guest leftbench23
Posted

The few vers/top guys I have asked lately about their willingness to bottom have replied "I'm a top only." So why list vers/top is you're only a top???

Posted

All I know about that, or any other position preference, is that it means what the provider says it means at that hour on that day and with that specific client. It does not have the same meaning on Tuesday that it has on Saturday, when the rent is due versus when the rent is paid up, in March or in November, with me or with Epigonos or anyone else.

Posted

I'm a bottom client. Prior to 2014 I would not hire "Vers/Bottom" escorts because I thought they would be bottoms only. Then I started chatting with a "Vers/Bottom" escort who seemed like he would be a lot of fun and decided to give him a try.

 

BEST

FUCK

EVER

 

Because he often bottomed, he would not cum when topping, which meant he could last and last and last and last. Since then, I have been more open to reaching out to "Vers/Bottom" escorts.

Posted

I'm a vers client. I have never hired a bottom escort - only top or vers. There is a guy I've been looking at who is so much my type in looks, build, etc. that I'm considering hiring him, even though he's a bottom. I think I would start with an hour to test the chemistry.

Posted

I’ve been with many vers/tops and tops who are very willing to bottom. I just ask, with something like “are versatile? I like to top” and often get a favorable response. I also kind of get a feel for the possibility by what they write on my profile before I ask. I don’t ask those who are adamant about being strictly top. Those who say yes are often quite good at bottoming, and I think are often better than some who only bottom. I wouldn’t limit myself, there are a lot more options than it would seem from checkboxes in a profile.

Posted
.....doesn't sound like "Fuck Yeah Daddy, pound my bussy you're hitting my spot!" :p

I like a bottom who is hungry for it. Begs for it. Can’t have enough of it. Wants me to go another round after destroying it. I think you and I think alike @JEC

Posted

i used to list myself as vers-top because i have occasionally enjoyed bottoming but it has mostly been a case-by-case basis where the chemistry just works that way. i am hired as a top most of the time, but when i started to get some disappointed folks when i didn't promise i would bottom, and explained the case-by-case thing, i realized it was probably misleading based on how the average guy seemed to interpert that, so i changed it to top. i've bottomed with clients, but it's a once a year kind of thing, and i realized i wasn't giving the best picture of what i can commit to versus what i might aspire to

Guest MikeThomas
Posted
Versatile/Top by Benjamin Nicholas:

 

I'm tall and built, so a larger percentage of gents want me as the more dominant guy in bed... But, I'm also perfectly capable of getting fucked and enjoying it immensely.

Please come to Chicago... before winter sets in!

Posted (edited)
so i changed it to top.

Don’t think for a minute that the change went unnoticed by the tops around here.....grin

 

To the OP. I can’t stand the “versatile/top” label. It’s just confusing. As we’ve seen

it can lead to confusion and frustration (aka “fertile grounds for hustling”). I’ve learned

to just ask or state my preference for the top bunk directly. In my experience most

escorts answer honestly when asked directly.

 

I’m glad Eric changed his label to “top”. If we met and I was expecting him to bottom,

it would be disappointing not to get a chance to fuck him (while he was doing poppers

and moaning “fuck me daddy” over and over. Not that I’ve spent hours and hours

dreaming about it or anything....grin) and I would most likely take it more personally

than I should.

 

If you put the word “versatile” anywhere in your ad, then I assume asking you to bottom

is fair game. Granted, you might say “no”...but then I would just move on to an escort

that’s a better match.

Edited by nycman
Posted
I can’t stand the “versatile/top” label. It’s just confusing.

 

I will be forever confused as to why some people find this confusing. When I encounter tops, vers tops, vers bottoms, and bottoms, I personally have zero confusion about that person's role based on these various labels.

Posted

I have found that guys who label themselves Versatile/Bottom when the times come to it are only a bottom unless you put a gun to their head. I would suggest either just put Versatile and be versatile or just put Bottom and love bottoming.

Posted

Well... truth be told (sorry :)) I was suggesting that versatile is code for bottom. Now, viagra/cialis may have changed all that but that's been my experience. Always interested in being enlightened.

Posted

I have my own personal decoder ;):

Bottom = Super pig power bottom (dick=oxygen)

Verse/Bottom = Bottom, will top rarely if the money is right

Verse = Bottom, will top if they really have to :rolleyes:

Verse/Top = Truly verse, likes bottoming but its not their kryptonite

Top = Top

Posted
I have my own personal decoder ;):

Bottom = Super pig power bottom (dick=oxygen)

Verse/Bottom = Bottom, will top rarely if the money is right

Verse = Bottom, will top if they really have to :rolleyes:

Verse/Top = Truly verse, likes bottoming but its not their kryptonite

Top = Top

PS this is a result of "bottom shaming". Everyone claims to be 1-2 notches closer to "top".

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...