Here it is..... no big deal:
Posted 21 hours ago (edited)
These three make for an undeniably hot throuple. Based on his OnlyFans content, ThicMuscleJock is appealing and looks like he’s worth every penny of his steep rates…if he actually delivers the fun sexiness in person.
What I find far less appealing is the tone of his profile. His profile states: “Looking for sugar daddy’s and regular weekly clients. FYI my rate is high so I’m really only interested in clients with deep pockets that can treat me right. Let’s chat and see if we’re a good fit.” While I respect the upfront screening, the message lands as extremely off-putting, even for one who could technically afford it. He’s explicitly looking for sugar daddies and weekly regulars, stating his rate is $1k/hour and that he’s only interested in clients with deep pockets who can also provide assumably luxury clothing, a condo, a car and other gifts in addition.
Maybe I’m old fashioned, but IMHO escorts are supposed to be in the business of selling fantasy. This profile does the opposite. It offers a cold, one-sided transaction that demands significant financial commitment while promising nothing beyond simply sharing proximity with this Adonis. That might be catnip for true cash slaves, but for a $4k monthly minimum spend, I’d expect more variety, reciprocity, and at least the illusion of mutual enjoyment.
I suspect he believes this blunt, high-value positioning will land him a sugar daddy. In my opinion, the opposite is true. I think men of means respond better to someone who plays the field, builds a loyal and satisfied clientele, and lets the deeper financial arrangements develop naturally. I can imagine very few clients, even wealthy ones, find the overt commodification of the relationship attractive when it’s spelled out so plainly in black and white. Just my 2 cents…