MakeMeCowboy

Here it is..... no big deal:
 
  Posted 21 hours ago (edited) These three make for an undeniably hot throuple. Based on his OnlyFans content, ThicMuscleJock is appealing and looks like he’s worth every penny of his steep rates…if he actually delivers the fun sexiness in person.
What I find far less appealing is the tone of his profile.  His profile states:  “Looking for sugar daddy’s and regular weekly clients. FYI my rate is high so I’m really only interested in clients with deep pockets that can treat me right. Let’s chat and see if we’re a good fit.”   While I respect the upfront screening, the message lands as extremely off-putting, even for one who could technically afford it. He’s explicitly looking for sugar daddies and weekly regulars, stating his rate is $1k/hour and that he’s only interested in clients with deep pockets who can also provide assumably luxury clothing, a condo, a car and other gifts in addition.
Maybe I’m old fashioned, but IMHO escorts are supposed to be in the business of selling fantasy. This profile does the opposite. It offers a cold, one-sided transaction that demands significant financial commitment while promising nothing beyond simply sharing proximity with this Adonis. That might be catnip for true cash slaves, but for a $4k monthly minimum spend, I’d expect more variety, reciprocity, and at least the illusion of mutual enjoyment.
I suspect he believes this blunt, high-value positioning will land him a sugar daddy. In my opinion, the opposite is true. I think men of means respond better to someone who plays the field, builds a loyal and satisfied clientele, and lets the deeper financial arrangements develop naturally. I can imagine very few clients, even wealthy ones, find the overt commodification of the relationship attractive when it’s spelled out so plainly in black and white.  Just my 2 cents…

Not always. I prefer a more filled out face and figure. I remember seeing this pic of Channing Tatum when he got all skinny for a role, he didn’t look as good as he did when he had some meat on his bones. I don’t like my men too lean.

So far my 500 marks have not been stellar.  The majority of escorts price themselves solely on looks when the experience they provide actually weighs more. So I have had better luck with the less-than-500 escorts with less inflated egos that actually try to make the experience memorable. 

thank you @Becket!

Here it is..... no big deal:
 
  Posted 21 hours ago (edited) These three make for an undeniably hot throuple. Based on his OnlyFans content, ThicMuscleJock is appealing and looks like he’s worth every penny of his steep rates…if he actually delivers the fun sexiness in person.
What I find far less appealing is the tone of his profile.  His profile states:  “Looking for sugar daddy’s and regular weekly clients. FYI my rate is high so I’m really only interested in clients with deep pockets that can treat me right. Let’s chat and see if we’re a good fit.”   While I respect the upfront screening, the message lands as extremely off-putting, even for one who could technically afford it. He’s explicitly looking for sugar daddies and weekly regulars, stating his rate is $1k/hour and that he’s only interested in clients with deep pockets who can also provide assumably luxury clothing, a condo, a car and other gifts in addition.
Maybe I’m old fashioned, but IMHO escorts are supposed to be in the business of selling fantasy. This profile does the opposite. It offers a cold, one-sided transaction that demands significant financial commitment while promising nothing beyond simply sharing proximity with this Adonis. That might be catnip for true cash slaves, but for a $4k monthly minimum spend, I’d expect more variety, reciprocity, and at least the illusion of mutual enjoyment.
I suspect he believes this blunt, high-value positioning will land him a sugar daddy. In my opinion, the opposite is true. I think men of means respond better to someone who plays the field, builds a loyal and satisfied clientele, and lets the deeper financial arrangements develop naturally. I can imagine very few clients, even wealthy ones, find the overt commodification of the relationship attractive when it’s spelled out so plainly in black and white.  Just my 2 cents…

Here it is..... no big deal:
 
  Posted 21 hours ago (edited) These three make for an undeniably hot throuple. Based on his OnlyFans content, ThicMuscleJock is appealing and looks like he’s worth every penny of his steep rates…if he actually delivers the fun sexiness in person.
What I find far less appealing is the tone of his profile.  His profile states:  “Looking for sugar daddy’s and regular weekly clients. FYI my rate is high so I’m really only interested in clients with deep pockets that can treat me right. Let’s chat and see if we’re a good fit.”   While I respect the upfront screening, the message lands as extremely off-putting, even for one who could technically afford it. He’s explicitly looking for sugar daddies and weekly regulars, stating his rate is $1k/hour and that he’s only interested in clients with deep pockets who can also provide assumably luxury clothing, a condo, a car and other gifts in addition.
Maybe I’m old fashioned, but IMHO escorts are supposed to be in the business of selling fantasy. This profile does the opposite. It offers a cold, one-sided transaction that demands significant financial commitment while promising nothing beyond simply sharing proximity with this Adonis. That might be catnip for true cash slaves, but for a $4k monthly minimum spend, I’d expect more variety, reciprocity, and at least the illusion of mutual enjoyment.
I suspect he believes this blunt, high-value positioning will land him a sugar daddy. In my opinion, the opposite is true. I think men of means respond better to someone who plays the field, builds a loyal and satisfied clientele, and lets the deeper financial arrangements develop naturally. I can imagine very few clients, even wealthy ones, find the overt commodification of the relationship attractive when it’s spelled out so plainly in black and white.  Just my 2 cents…

Fully smooth:
https://rent.men/DznNYC
Hairy:
https://rent.men/SweetnFitNYC
 
Variety is the spice of life!   You can’t have one without the other. 

It was a great/fun experience. No problems setting things up. And he comes by his moniker honestly.  Looks and body, he's a 10.

It was a great/fun experience. No problems setting things up. And he comes by his moniker honestly.  Looks and body, he's a 10.

I booked him for later today.  Hopefully I'll have a good experience
 

It's been 5 years or so, but I've had a few fun encounters with him.

He quoted me 500$.  I told him that was outside of my budget.  He wanted to negotiate but I lost interest.

I met him about a month ago.  Sexy as they come and with a nice edge to him.  We had good chemistry which helps.  His handsome face matches the body.

As a simple rule, I subtract an inch which does a decent job of realigning expectations.

i saw him yesterday... I definitely recommend. 

Yesterday. The guy is wicked sexy. Photos can't capture what this guy has and brings to the experience.

I've met with him twice.  He has a DOM attitude, which is genuine and very sexy. I enjoyed him both times.

I regret that I've stumbled into a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. 
Have a day! 

My experience with him is that he didn't leave enough time between appointments to freshen up. When I realized that was the most likely scenario, I cut the session short.

Reece Rothmeier and I had become friendly.  His name was Jimmy.  Gorgeous man.  He was a cross between JFK Jr. & Tom of Finland.  He had an awesome playroom.  I have pics of him somewhere.... I'll try and dig a few up.

As a simple rule, I subtract an inch which does a decent job of realigning expectations.

Lucky_Stud
This listing is new, I think.  Has anyone seen him?

Reece Rothmeier and I had become friendly.  His name was Jimmy.  Gorgeous man.  He was a cross between JFK Jr. & Tom of Finland.  He had an awesome playroom.  I have pics of him somewhere.... I'll try and dig a few up.

Hes a VERY sexy man. I thought the wild natural beard was a turn on. But then I have ZERO interest in kissing providers..so maybe thats why it doesnt bother me...and is actually a turn ON for its unique and masculine appearance. 
Theres plenty of other attributes on this handsome fellow to focus on. 

I have met up with HotTopNine 2x. Both were great.  We had good chemistry, and pretty much from the moment he walked in, we started making out and were off to the races.  Great kisser, passionate and edgy, great meat, and when he came, it was an honest holy sh*t moment.