SirBillybob

Imma do me for sure. Au contraire, you’re making oodles of time and energy to get to bye. You’d think there was a crisis; a contact number with which you repeatedly get “message box is full”. Good luck with the toothache.

Each episode is, impressively, single-shot style. Graham and Doherty are superb. Glad I’m not a parent with adolescents and watching this.

The first sentence would mean I had actually considered it an impropriety and that I’m unable to handle with equanimity life’s little speed bumps, such as somebody managing their personal paid public-facing property in the way they prefer or my flipping through a phone booth directory pages and discovering that somebody had ripped out the section on better business bureau complaint contacts. I wouldn’t consider the absence of a contact method a torrential downpour on my punting parade. If the ad were to be one of the very few that interest me there would be naughty options in terms of how to relate to it.

If they had been Caucasian I suspect we wouldn’t be privy to the ethnicity category.

Righto, also being a talcum order.

Johnsons makes sense. My point is that that particular version is inconsistently delineated within their own branding. More lack of attention to detail than wilting manners.

The punter constituency’s johnsons set the price, not Johnsons / Johnson’s … let me know when they figure out how to spell the venue. The dancers don’t set the price. Patrons’ payment of costs historically, including adjustments along the way, dictates it. I don’t go there and the currency conversion yields an absurd upcharge so I would likely try to figure out how to cum more rapidly.

A key element not discussed was the difference between generalized latent or absent orgasm in which the phenomenon is consistent in all contexts, partner and autosexual, versus situational with partner(s), versus masturbatory. One obvious way to partially rule out physiological causality is to inquire about arousal and orgasm that may be comparatively accessible autosexually. This must be handled sensitively as the partner desiring the other’s elusive orgasm will often frame the problem as a withholding once made aware of the contextual difference. Women generally won’t have attributed to them such a wilful deprivation of partners’ satisfaction with her climax, yet both genders’ common basis of anorgasmia is not having reached the threshold of arousal that promotes orgasm. Some men may have, in a sense, premature arousal in which the logical outcome should be orgasm but the robust tumescence is erroneously conflated with sufficient subjective arousal for it. This doesn’t mean they are not turned on, just not enough to arrive at the synthesis of factors culminating in orgasm. Women’s partners may activate a workhorse role if presented with the notion that she is underaroused. In contrast, anorgasmic mens’ partners faced with robust erections along with the notion of insufficient subjective arousal for orgasm may take it more personally and assume hangups related to internal prohibitions or deliberate or even subconscious suppression of what is framed, perhaps overly simplistically, as the most valued ultimate outcome. The orgasm’s enemy is the punitive consequence of its non-existence.

It’s as if a new disorder has been manufactured. We have biogenic and/or psychogenic erectile disorder intrinsic to a male. And an absurd attempt to treat a version of erectile function that is neither of the former and not reflective of pathology, but driven by commercial expectations for function. How about forgoing this kind of amateurish diagnosis, sparing the guy’s uptake of drugs, and taking a chill pill oneself? Setting up compensation contingencies for functioning that evades absolute prediction on their part seems to be a far more onerous exercise than broadening capacity for erotic enjoyment that doesn’t entirely hinge on a few cubic centimetres of intracavernosal tissue.

Paywall workaround?

Google is your friend in terms of accessing educational resources on the basics of male sexual function.

No, these encounters don’t occur in a geopolitical context of hyper medicalization and pharmacology. These dudes are not accessing and consuming PDE5i meds or combo IM prostaglandin / papaverine / phentolamine. But they belong to a minority of men with autonomously accessible erectile reliability fundamentally irrespective of interactional context. You will also see here periodic claims of escorts posting on the board that they possess such membership.

Like you, I would roll with less than optimal penile tumescence, particularly with a regular with whom enjoyment had historically occurred. I also avoid conflating the term performance with traditional bona fide erectile function because tumescence is only truly reflective of subjective sexual arousal on my side of the equation. I wouldn’t be capable of a performative erection, without all of the elements prompting true arousal, if my life depended on it. The only logical reason to use performative nomenclature with an escort is the reality that their erectile function is potentially out of sync with what promotes physical male sexual arousal in general, or specific to their arousal template. Few things are more anathema to their erectile potential than the requirement that they simulate true arousal yet sustain punitive consequences for failure to deliver. Binding physical erection to monetary compensation is just one more way of ensuring a disconnect between two functional contexts, one naturalistic, the other obligatory. It doesn’t bode well for sexual health. Grousing about inconsistent capacity to perform, without attempting to grasp the complexity of male sexual response, is nothing short of childish. Again, my view is framed within a regular repeat situation. If a new one off and no overt erection meeting the traditional threshold for various activities occurs, I won’t have actually initially dictated erectile requirements. It’s exploratory. Some guys are better at meeting my requirements for an exciting sexual encounter that doesn’t demand their penile arousal compared to others whose erectile capability is not obligatory but occurs notwithstanding, is invariant due to unique factors that guarantee consistent tumescence. But I want to avoid the problematic own goal of missing out on a good match in which erections are not uniformly on tap. I never suggest or insist on chemical intervention. Many of my regulars have consistent robust erections. Could be serendipity. I wouldn’t myself take personal credit for it, and they are not contractually bound to it. Emancipated from a demand they might actually finesse other valued components of erotic interaction.

Gaseous lying if denial of hearsay representing fact. Hot stuff in bed if pants on fire. Gaslighting if attempts to explain gaseous combustion as perceiver’s figmental mirage.

Haven’t seen it yet. Will likely load it on my device for some imminent lengthy international flights. Curtis is also so good in the episode ‘The Fishes’ in the series The Bear. S2Ep6. Won best guest actress comedy series Emmy. Not to be missed.

Hahahah … not.

418: a teapot permanently refusing to brew coffee, if the emphasis is worthless rip-off subscription scams.

The musical?

Apparently you need to telephone to access the actual address of the appointment, but it also seems, if I’ve got this right, that the incall rendezvous rooms are under one roof. Is that so? After you’ve been initiated / “broken in” the first time does this mean you’ll automatically know the location for subsequent bookings irrespective of the escort? Also, if they won’t share a face photo prior to booking is it possible that once they trust and value you as a client that you will at least have access to the catalogue of escorts and face pics even if it’s not digitally transferable to your own device so as to prevent you from sharing them elsewhere?

I never heard such. I only listened to an interview in which MD shared his father had danced at Campus. I know the mother’s name only but wouldn’t post either parent’s true name.

I think somebody somewhere in Kansas named Sam already has her claws in Viglundur.

Abandoned buildings old port. U r guay. 😉

I’ve seen his gyrating bare behind a few feet away from my backroom cubicle seating by peering over the buff shoulder of dancers more to my liking. A few months ago I went up to him using his birth name to propose private cubicle time and he stated a 50% upcharge per song. I responded I’d think about it. I might have gone through with ticking the box for the usual release outcome but recalled that in his first year I truncated it after the first $20 because the first few minutes were startlingly offputting. I’m sure he has modified his style, though. You can walk into a setting and get guys in Brazil just as attractive, or more so IMO with faces more handsome, for full sex for the price of 2-ish songs. Their images are not insertable here. I can see his overall appeal to many here, though, also seeing as he has infused some of his erotica with elements of comedy. However, I’ll never understand the cliché upreg in value add and cost predicated on filmed sex accessible in the public domain, for any escort. I would only categorize it as a particular advertising component and the trickle down into comfort with erotica production doesn’t correlate well with physical attractiveness. I don’t mean to conflate fashion modelling with erotica but he was brought up and there is a brief bathing costume runway walk clip of some three years ago. If he showed up at my door with a packet of DareTM crackers he’d be welcome to munch on them in my bed but I wouldn’t go out of my way otherwise. What I really want to know is whether I took dances from his father decades ago as he evidently (from horse’s mouth) worked at Campus in his day.

Will it be adequately settled before page 5?