SirBillybob

As long as he’s verbal about eyeliner tips.

Fixed-income dirt-poor pensioner. Me, in case you’re wondering.

So far no complaints but it’s a leap year with two days yet to go.

It wasn’t your enema but he wuz.

It’s a portmanteau that was likely intended to mean one thing but doesn’t.

I think that in true Coffindom the buyer truly pays the 5 bucks to the Starbucks barista and gets underhandedly yet with fundamental awareness decaffeinated while craving caffeine, all along accepting the gouging with equanimity, emotionally reconciled as it satisfies a niche need that transcends the coffee fix and the cash value, possibly even leaving a tip and 5 stars. If it’s implicit (nudge /wink) but not openly negotiated that the buyer receives $4.75 in change along with a healthy cup of water while the mental fantasy of being fleeced, of being restricted to what the barista decides to provide, is accommodated it’s a simulation and not Coffindom. Dunkin’ may be nearby. I assume paypigs in either example mingle with contexts of more conventional transaction. Same distinction between true sexualized financial domination where the roles are literal and the dominatrix accommodates his desire for profit along with the client’s subjugation and ultimate taxation that the client requests versus faxing it in where the roles are findomplayed with the notion of beneficence underlying it. In the former the client seeks expense reality and attendant fantasy, not just the make-believe variety of rinsing. One or the other, possibly both scenarios for any one client, may fit their arousal template. Therefore, employing the one term as one size fits all is limiting and it’s tempting to conflate the sub role with mental illness and dom role with unethical opportunism when there are naturally version variants. That, and there is the idea of subjective appraisal and personal autonomy as far as what it means to be left in better or no worse shape at the end of the day, including the balance sheet.

Unfortunately, the financial ruin for some, having agreed to be rinsed of cash, etc, depletes the resources needed to mitigate the consequences of what for a number of subs is a debilitating compulsion. That it seems to be a version of consensual masochism doesn’t rinse the phenomenon to a clean bill of mental health. Surely there can be some things in life requested and accommodated that cast the soliciting, the granting, or both in a negative light within a ‘do no harm to self or others’ framework. The dom is better equipped to decide what kind of [race track, dealer (or insert comparator)] to be. They are dom because they are one up in a dynamic in which psychological pathology may be at the root of the exchange. I would never go as far as to ascribe characterological dominance to the dom despite the posturing because transactions totally rest on subs’ existence. To the degree that there is unidirectional exploitive potential the quality of the personhood of somebody offering dom services is eroded.

But new backup maintenance fan belts for the Porsche and Maserati collection, now we’re talking.

They may do well to be less on the nose and to list for example methods of payment as Cash, Visa, Mastercard, AMEX, Venmo, PayPal, and PayPig.

Also we’d be strapped themselves.

It’s not like this is the first time an answer is elusive, not realistically forthcoming, when the question is rate-orical.

I’ve been to both this month and both currently generally awful. In particular, if you have an anthropological interest in what a 50-dollar escort generally looks like in spite of possibly possessing a heart of gold, Thermas is your place. The static constancy of price is a problem, as well as the lack of a middle ground between platform ad-based guys and what’s on tap in a structured but progressively more limited venue. YMMV. It’s taken me several visits adding up to many weeks of Barcelona presence during 2024 to build up an alternative but modest outcall roster of repeat-worthy trade.

I already get Discovery included in a jawsome package deal. It even sometimes includes sperm whales.

Ahah! Oh my stars! I just looked at an ad of a well known Barcelona guy and the stars were not tampered. Then linked him here and the stars redact immediately shows though review text remains. So it could be a artefact of an ad having been linked to any outside source or specifically to this board. Likely the latter because I went back on RMen and it was back to unaltered.

Maybe the censoring overlay is an algorithm that is triggered for an ad only if the ad had been subject to a linking, and then the redact text is permanent? Not a big deal, just curious.

Still doesn’t add up because very explicit text commentaries following the tampered star line are still there. Is it possibly an attempt by a censorship algorithm that falls short of redacting the review text component? Also, I am not ever in the USA myself. Are you suggesting it is occurring for ads in which the provider is located in USA? When I look up USA ads here in Canada the stars are not redacted with the stated red text I described but the example I provided was an ad that had been linked here. Yet when I clear my browser and start fresh looking up that ad through my premium membership the redact text over the stars is still there for that guy.🤷‍♂️

Not highlighted in the article but hundreds of thousands of deaths annually are attributable to syphilis. MSM don’t risk STI in a population vacuum.

About 1 in 20 in 20teens decade, and irreversible consequences of morbidity for tens of thousands of others.

By the by, re: U=U, TASP, etc, HIViral suppression guidelines were revised last year. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/360860/9789240055179-eng.pdf

Lately I’ve noticed, I think only when an ad is linked here, some text over review stars, always red and the same delineation of letters and numbers? Seems to be a repetitive string of ‘ebf3’. Anybody? I redacted the reviewer pseudonym in appended screenshot example.

Sorry dude. I had decided to delete my post on the Bogotá ad that may be different age time frame but same person advertiser photos shortly after writing it because I wasn’t fully up to sleuthing on the chaps represented. For others interested they can look up Hunqz Bogotá location.

For sures. P and CP, not so much PNP.

Very specific. Smex. Odour fetish? A consensual S&M smackin’ around? Paid with AMEX? A combo of the aforementioned?

For Puck’s sake, NickBottom.

I’d need to better master origami before attempting reverse origami. I say give everybody else a hand.