nycman

From the TMZ article: "We're told her condition prevents doctors from performing any tests to determine if she was driving under the influence of alcohol." That’s one of the stupidest sentences I’ve ever read.

First 48 hours ice and elevate (Slow down the inflammation) After that, heat and gently start using again (Speed up the healing). I don’t think there any real science behind that though. Personally, I always do which ever one feels better, and for me that’s usually ice and elevate.

I don’t disagree. I believe most of the speculation that frames B-E is from data on the older vaccine, cross referenced with antibody titers seen after vaccination with the new vaccine. Also known as a wild fucking guess, but it’s the best we’ve got at the moment since there are no large "real life" trials of the new vaccine against Monkey Pox in humans that I’m aware of. So yes, ”A" is the best answer. You’re cute when you get defensive. In all honesty, it was meant as a compliment. You’re wicked smart, it’s just hard for lay people to understand some of the graphs and charts you post.

I will do my best to translate @SirBillybob into street English. A) We don’t really fucking know. B) Remote smallpox vaccination seems to be somewhat protective, especially against severe disease, but not so much against mild (and still transmittable) cases. C) A single shot of the new vaccine is somewhere around 85% protective 4 weeks after the shot, and again even more so against severe disease. D) Two shots of the new vaccine (and I’m willing to bet one old smallpox and one shot new vaccine) seems to get you into the 90-95% protective range and prolongs your immunity past the 2 year mark. E) A severe case in a double vaxed patient would be very unusual and most likely point to a problem with their immune system. In summary, if I got the old smallpox vaccine, I would still get the new vaccine ASAP, and I would still get the second shot of the new vaccine 4 weeks later (if I could). Most importantly, keep your dick in your pants, don’t rub up against other people, keep your mouth off of other people, keep their mouths off of you, and don’t shove a cock up your ass until we get the "all clear". I now return you to @SirBillybob’s much more erudite discussion.

Either way, I’d fuck him.

The travel schedule screams "fake".

That’s funny, I see it as a very mild form of submissive play. I mean come on, it’s got "puppy’ and "play" right in the title. I guess it all depends on the players. My forays into puppy play have been fun, entertaining, and sexy as fuck.

Personally, I don’t think it has the same sting that black face did. I believe most of these actors are in fact gay, so that whole layer of objectifying and mocking isn’t nearly as strong. It’s still slightly insulting, but at the end of the day the stereotypes they portrayed are based on reality. Just maybe not my reality, or everyone’s reality. That’s true in any portrayal of anyone. Even those not in a ”minority" or "oppressed" category. After all, there’s plenty of cringe worthy shows about straight white males. At the end of the day it’s meant to be entertainment, not a documentary.

28/36….an "average’ score. I did better than I thought I would. Interestingly, my "misses" seemed to come in groups.

Yep, changing the deal after arrival, will quickly get you politely shown to the door. I don’t care how "hot" you are. I don’t like liars or thieves.

32 years old?

What a beautiful ass! "Top only"…..sigh.

He’s solid B list mostly because of his looks. The Kardshian whores?….D list….at best. Sorry, talent still factors into "celebrity status" in my book.

I hire a slutty muscle jock bottom and fuck him silly. Works every time.

And here I am think, "that’s sad, she was so young". For all the other sports averse homos out there, he’s talking about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vin_Scully

Idiotic "Infectious Disease Experts" trying to qualify and quantify our sexuality. My screening....”Are you a whore who has sex with men?"….yes?…you’re in. So fucking stupid…..vaccinate the "whores" you morons!

You’re incredibly smart….but sometimes I feel like I’m listening to a Catholic Mass in Latin in the early 60’s. It’s hard as fuck to understand. You might want to dumb it down, or risk your audience misinterpreting what you’re trying to say. Or in the words of Monty Python, "blessed are the cheesemakers????"

Which we all know you did, so stop dusting off the sand in my house and acting all surprised about "where did all this the sand came from???"…..whore.

Did it already get picked up for a second season? I’d be surprised. It was better than I expected, but I agree it was a Sex in the City knock off, which was how it was pitched, so I guess on that point they delivered. At the end of the day, I didn’t care about any of them, just like Sex in the City. Vapid NYC queens, behaving like vapid NYC queens. You just know in season 2 (if there is one) they will be trolloping off to a fabulous house on Fire Island, that in reality none of them could afford. Season 3 , P-town, which they will hate because it’s not NYC. Season 4 Rehoboth, which paradoxically they will love because it’s ”authentic"……yawn. This crap writes itself, and that’s not a good thing. Season 1: B- (mostly for André De Shields (A+), everyone else (C-).

Before getting the first shot, full stop since mid-May. 4 weeks after 1st shot, open to hiring others who are also 4 weeks out. 2nd shot, will still only be hiring others who are at least 4 weeks out from their 1st shot. It doesn’t make 100% sense, but it’s what I’m comfortable with.

Wow, thanks for this one. Just finished binge watching it. As a gay boy whose first “boyfriend” was a closeted bi-sexual jock, it really hit home. They did a great job depicting the tortuous love that exists in that complicated and wonderful world.

Kind of, sort of, not really,,,,,, https://www.npr.org/2022/07/31/1114759037/happy-birthday-george-jetson

I can’t help but wonder why people return to a well that has no water.

Ouch, tough crowd!