Jump to content

Monarchy79

Members
  • Posts

    2,023
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Applause
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from + Travis69 in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    Just because people agree with your antics doesn’t make it “just”. 
    It just means that they are just like you. 
    And any grown man who thinks it’s cute to crack fat jokes on someone, calling them such juvenile names as “whale of a man” leave a lot to be desired when it comes to class, maturity and overall decency. 
     
    You may not proclaim yourself to be limp wristed, but if your comments could be personified;  a pink, patent-leathered Chanel purse would fall right out of your mouth… 
    Now I am going to gift you the rare gift of having the last word, as I don’t want this forum to be closed by the moderator…. 
     
    You’re Welcome. 
     
  2. Applause
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from MaybeMaybeNot in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    That may be a fact. 
    But the truth is that out of the thousands of members on this site, there’s going to be someone who looks like that guy, is his weight, and has been insulted with such comments, and your posting is going to trigger their past trauma. 
     
    I know how you roll, but I have a preference for forum posts that are honest, but also are less vitriolic. We endure enough of that outside of this forum in real life, so let’s try to be civil here and create a safe space for opinions and even debate. 
  3. Haha
    Monarchy79 reacted to pubic_assistance in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    Well...I'm not "gay" (maybe half)..so I don't speak for that community.
    As far as "being mean". I'm pretty sure that obese whale of a human isnt here on the site.  So there is no one to be mean to. I am sharing an honest opinion on a forum designed to share opinions.  We aren't at a lady's tea party where I am restricted to complimenting your dress and talk about the weather. So my opinion stands.
  4. Confused
    Monarchy79 reacted to pubic_assistance in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    I enjoy being myself. Always have.
    Maybe the "limpwristed" crowd don't enjoy my frankness, but enough of the gentlemen here do...So I refute this accusation that any opinion about physical appearance on a site that frequently discusses physical appearance is "mean" if it's not pretending to be kind.
    No victim/ no crime.
  5. Like
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from MaybeMaybeNot in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    Agreed. 
    and my opinion is that you’re mean. 
    what’s the issue here? 
  6. Thanks
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from Danny-Darko in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    It’s also important to understand gay porn’s foundational beginnings….
    One of the first gay porn studios (it was either Colt or Falcon), had strict requirements in their films….the actors were required to be:
    1.) Young
    2.) Fit
    3.) White (preferably blonde). And in this particular studio, if black actors performed, they either played secondary roles (as like the hotel doorman or something), of if in a sex scene, could only Top and never Bottom.
    4.) Masculine presenting 
    5.) and the soles of their feet had to be clean (there are a lot of films (of all genres), that neglected to address this issue and would accidentally capture male performers with dirty feet. 
    This same studio was also made aware (in advance) of the pending AIDS epidemic, didn’t inform their actors and still pressured them into condomless sex, which killed an entire generation of young porn actors. 

    Once  I find the documentary, I’ll post it here. 
     
  7. Agree
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from thomas in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    You make an excellent point, and this further delves into the social aspect of human beings overall and how groups who are marginalized will marginalize the next group they believe is beneath them on the social “hierarchy”. 
    Although gay men have endured a lot of marginalization, this community created its  own microcosm of internal discrimination to further continue this pathetic cycle. 
     
     
  8. Surprised
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from marylander1940 in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    It’s also important to understand gay porn’s foundational beginnings….
    One of the first gay porn studios (it was either Colt or Falcon), had strict requirements in their films….the actors were required to be:
    1.) Young
    2.) Fit
    3.) White (preferably blonde). And in this particular studio, if black actors performed, they either played secondary roles (as like the hotel doorman or something), of if in a sex scene, could only Top and never Bottom.
    4.) Masculine presenting 
    5.) and the soles of their feet had to be clean (there are a lot of films (of all genres), that neglected to address this issue and would accidentally capture male performers with dirty feet. 
    This same studio was also made aware (in advance) of the pending AIDS epidemic, didn’t inform their actors and still pressured them into condomless sex, which killed an entire generation of young porn actors. 

    Once  I find the documentary, I’ll post it here. 
     
  9. Confused
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from pubic_assistance in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    What he  @pubic_assistancesaid reflects the actual reality of what gay men say to themselves and to each other when they see images like this. 
    Hard Truth: Gay men (for the most part) are mean to each other. In fact, so mean, that there are tons of social media posts, Reddit threads and discussion points on the topic. 
  10. Agree
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from marylander1940 in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    Gay porno will never embrace body positivity for the same reason why body positivity has never been embraced in the gay community overall:
    ALL Men are shallow.  This includes “victims” of body positivity. 
    Men of all body types want the same range of physical aesthetics (lean, righted, muscled, athletic)  in a man and are very discerning about it too. 
    Men in general (of all sexual orientations), have a sense of hipocrisy when it comes to the requirements they have for others’ appearance…. A straight man will judge women’s faces and bodies with hard  critiques as he hasn’t seen a gym since middle school and can’t find his penis because his apron beer belly has been obstructing it’s view for the past 20 years. 

    And with gay men, it’s just about the same. I remember being in a social setting when this guy was whining about his inability to find a man….. when he told me what he was looking for, I figured out why he’s having problems…. He’s searching for 10s and he’s a universal 3 at best. 
     
  11. Haha
    Monarchy79 reacted to + Charlie in Sex After 20 Years Living Together   
    What is this "sex" of which you speak?
  12. Like
    Monarchy79 reacted to + Vegas_Millennial in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    Because professional pornography is made for the customer's fantasy, not the performer's 😉.
  13. Like
    Monarchy79 reacted to SouthOfTheBorder in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    true 
    the abused/marginalized frequently recreate the abusive dynamic as the aggressor when they feel someone is below them, or less than, for whatever reason.  
    and many are too damaged and lacking any self-awareness to know 
  14. Applause
    Monarchy79 reacted to MaybeMaybeNot in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    I am not saying I am attracted to this guy or want to watch his porn, but that doesn't mean he isn't a human being worthy of respect. If people want to watch him, more power to them.  There is an audience for him.  No need to be unkind. 
  15. Applause
    Monarchy79 reacted to + BenjaminNicholas in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    It's not that they haven't tried.  It's just that it probably hasn't sold as well.
    Guys don't watch porn to see themselves.  They watch it to watch the unattainable.  The fantasy.  
    That's what porn is:  A highly unrealistic, hyper-visual, fantasy-driven medium.
    This sort of marginalized porn has usually been shoehorned into a fetish category and as much as I'd like to see society evolve, it's not realistic to think it's going to change anytime soon.  
    The gay community is mega progressive in regards to our rights, but we heavily inner-discriminate if someone doesn't fit within a classic frame of beauty.
  16. Applause
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from pubic_assistance in Should gay porno embrace body positivity?   
    Gay porno will never embrace body positivity for the same reason why body positivity has never been embraced in the gay community overall:
    ALL Men are shallow.  This includes “victims” of body positivity. 
    Men of all body types want the same range of physical aesthetics (lean, righted, muscled, athletic)  in a man and are very discerning about it too. 
    Men in general (of all sexual orientations), have a sense of hipocrisy when it comes to the requirements they have for others’ appearance…. A straight man will judge women’s faces and bodies with hard  critiques as he hasn’t seen a gym since middle school and can’t find his penis because his apron beer belly has been obstructing it’s view for the past 20 years. 

    And with gay men, it’s just about the same. I remember being in a social setting when this guy was whining about his inability to find a man….. when he told me what he was looking for, I figured out why he’s having problems…. He’s searching for 10s and he’s a universal 3 at best. 
     
  17. Hide Eyes
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from Medin in Latino circumcised bottoms - the near impossible find   
    Well….. sharing that you grew  up in an all white American small city, and your mind saying “yuck”, to things that weren’t the “standard”, based on your environment, this speaks volumes to your pathology, how you think, and the comments you make in these forums. 
     
  18. Haha
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from Hen in Who WOULD you pay $1000 for one hour with?   
    Only ONE man I’d spend $1,000 to be with…
    First Name: Neiman
    Last Name: Marcus
     
  19. Like
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from J. S. in 411 on Tito   
    I took the plunge and saw him last night....
    The name “Tito” in itself is a bit off putting. He’s more like a Vlad, an Igor, or a Mikhail. He’s either Russian, or Eastern European, But NOTHING like these Eastern European “models”, “Instagram guys”, or “rent men twinks or twunks”, who are usually discussed here.
     
    Very nice guy, and very focused. Travelled with his table, very clean and sanitized setup as well. There was no draping, but his reasoning for you being naked is not for any reason but for him to thoroughly massage and stretch everything with ease. I truly believe that he’s a heterosexual (but not in a negative way).
     
    He has extensive massage skills that are proven on the table. His massage isn’t sensual, erotic, or even therapeutic. This is a strictly intense athlete’s massage. Like post-Russian-Professional- gymnastic-athlete-massage. Like a Muy-Thai-Boxer’s recovery treatment. It’s like getting a massage in a Turkish or Russian bath.
     
    He massaged everything from head to toe... and there was no inkling or hint of any possibility of “fun” happening.
     
    This is the type of guy you see after an intense sporting event, or after continuous athletic training. This is not a massage you get to “feel good”, or be aroused, or have your “root chakras titillated”...
     
    From the intense trigger point work, and stretching, I feel like a new man. Released the pressure from every knot I had.
     
    If he lived in my town, I’d definitely see him once a quarter. If you workout, or are an avid runner or cyclist.... get on his table.
  20. Haha
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from Kevin U in Who WOULD you pay $1000 for one hour with?   
    Only ONE man I’d spend $1,000 to be with…
    First Name: Neiman
    Last Name: Marcus
     
  21. Haha
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from CuddleBuddy in Who WOULD you pay $1000 for one hour with?   
    Only ONE man I’d spend $1,000 to be with…
    First Name: Neiman
    Last Name: Marcus
     
  22. Agree
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from Luv2play in Why does everything need to be served spicy now?   
    Personally,
    Food can be flavorful and have some spiciness, without being so hot that my sense of taste is burned off my tongue…. 
     
    I also try my best to avoid extremely spicy food, but not because I don’t like it, but because of my philosophy on spicy food:
    If it’s hot going IN, it’s going to be just at HOT coming OUT 🔥🚽
  23. Eye Roll
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from coriolis888 in Who WOULD you pay $1000 for one hour with?   
    Only ONE man I’d spend $1,000 to be with…
    First Name: Neiman
    Last Name: Marcus
     
  24. Applause
    Monarchy79 reacted to + WstVlgChris in SacredIntimate   
    I have an appointment tomorrow and will report back. 
  25. Agree
    Monarchy79 got a reaction from Your Man in Arlington in Is there recourse for getting back a deposit from a provider?   
    Consider this a nominal fee you paid to learn two valuable lessons:
    1.) Don’t give deposits
    2.) When people have long stories, explanations or exchanges, filled with “complex” matters and circumstances… it’s usually bullshit. 
     
×
×
  • Create New...