Monarchy79

Then the poster should stay in his lane. Imagine what would happen if some random dude on the street would confront Mike Tyson (to his face), and critique his boxing abilities? The said “critic” could easily say “well he’s not being paid to box”, but he doesn’t have the talent, training or experience to address a professional athlete in that manner.

Then put yourself up on an ad on RM and see how you’ll stack up against this guy and let’s see the proof.

Then I certainly annoy the hell out of you. The reason why I do this is simple. I just personally don’t like how many trolls on such sites use their anonymity as a springboard to highlight the ultimate worst aspects of human nature. I think it’s cowardly and lame. The way I address matters online I is the same way I’d address an individual in-person. I know from much of the nonsense I’ve read in these comments over the years, that many of these guys would not operate in the same manner. it’s convenient to be rude, shallow, misogynistic, racist, exploitative, disrespectful, catty, and nasty online, when hiding behind a computer screen. Many people take advantage of that convenience. I don’t profess myself to be the arbiter of social standards of behavior at all. But we ALL know when people are crossing the line of what’s socially appropriate (yes, there is a line). And you know it too. 😎

In most cases, yes. “Peanut Gallery” critics usually have minimal talents or capabilities, which is why they enjoy sitting as a spectator picking others apart.

In the cases of these forums, no one’s being an “astute critic”. Picking apart some escort’s body fat count, number of crow’s feet creases or the number of grey hairs on his nuts, isn’t a required “analysis”or high standard of research & review. It’s just simply being catty.

He isn’t proving anything. The OP used the word “proving” in the title of this Forum, Owen didn’t use the term at all. Stop being catty.

You’re correct. We shouldn’t argue. what annoys me is when people on these forums use the advantage of their anonymity to ridiculously critique the looks of performers & providers who are literally paid because of their looks. Also, 99.99999 percent of the time, that subject provider looks far better than the person carefully critiquing their looks. It’s the hypocrisy that triggers the arguments, not anyone’s individual freedom of opinion to comment.

I like the way you think.

You know what I’m meant… LOL What I was asking was this: Once you’ve finished sex with the first guy, do you shower before sex with the next guy…. Your posting led me to believe that you may not.

Do you take a shower before the second guy comes over?

A gargle with some mouthwash (and or peroxide), doesn’t hurt for just getting rid of general bacteria from oral “activities”. i don’t know if these things work for mitigating STD transmission, but I’ll just say that I’ve never had an oral STD, and have been using mouthwash & peroxide after every oral encounter, since 1997. I also think that overall good dental hygiene must be maintained too (outside of post sex activities). Many people are susceptible to oral STDs because they have poor oral hygiene overall. Plus, who wants to walk around with post-fun dick (ball & ass) breath?

Sniffies is a hookup site that epitomizes ”microwave” - “fast-food” hookups. When getting on the site, a map shows up (based on your location), and literally pictures of dicks and asses pop up all over the place. in addition to that, random cruising spots also populate. If you exchange messages with anyone, expect them to be inarticulate, short with the expectation of an immediate hookup.

Please explain the “difference” between these two types of people…..

You must not realize that many people who have died of Fentanyl overdoses did not knowingly use Fentanyl. In many cases, they were “partying” with other drugs (Tina, Coke, etc.) not realizing it was cut with Fentanyl. There’s no “levels” to drug use, and no junkie is “better” than the other. So whether you’re “partying” with Tina, Heroin, Coke, or straight up Fentanyl, you’re all on the same sinking boat together, and need help.

Very accurate. They are usually playing a game where they are exploring multiple options, trying to find what they think may be the “best”, not realizing that the other guys they are chatting with are doing the same thing. Where I live, these guys pull the same crap. By the time the night starts to end, they usually end up with one of the following: 1.) blue balls 2.) or on a site like sniffies, headed out to cruise for whatever is left. 😂

Personally I’d rather someone block me for my demographic, than take my money and give me a terrible, lackluster experience.

It’s a part of life that I’m unbothered by at this point. I just make people look stupid when I encounter it in-person. If on a hook up app or a site like RM or MF, I’m not bothered by being blocked or ignored. I’d rather someone block me, than meet up and have a terrible experience. As long as my ability to vote, buy property, earn a living and invest my earnings are intact, I’m good . 🙂

Scenarios like this usually occur after the said provider asks for a picture. once that pic comes through, the potential client’s race, assumed age, and body type are all revealed. Once the provider blocks him, he can conclude that at least one of those three demographics were why.

You’re correct. There’s nothing with bumps. I’ve bumped myself. However, when the bumps are excessive, with the same person bumping continuously, this is indicative of someone who needs to just hire the person themselves, instead of waiting for someone else to take the plunge. I’ve bumped before, and when there was no response, I simply hired the guy. I had a great experience. But to sit back, and continuously bump, to wait for the next guy to make that move is socially cowardly and somewhat shady.

I 100% agree. Because many gay men are plagued with insecurity, the first (and easiest) method of handling it, is to deflect and transfer that trauma to someone else. The moment an already insecure guy sees a more vulnerable guy who is available to transfer the trauma to, he will definitely take the opportunity to expose and humiliate him, in order to take the attention off of himself. Very wise of you to advise the benefits of projecting confidence.

I’m not an enforcer of order & decorum. I’m just a promoter of good character and positive social behavior.

It’s not a narrow view. It’s noticed and documented from your multiple daily posts. Your behaviors of consistently bumping and inquiring on masseurs and providers daily, with rarely taking the plunge or sharing experiences of your own, displays a self-absorbed pathology…. under the mantras of letting everyone else take the risks of being “first”, and asking for all of the reviews and never contributing. I never attempted to control your behaviors, I just called you out on it, knowing that it teeters along a thin line of social ineptitude. You’re like the guy who goes to the bar with his friends, and accepts the other round of shots, but never treats the crew to a round on your tab. Or the guy who plays “truth or dare”, at a party, asks the most salacious questions to other players, but when it’s your turn, you consistently pick “dare”, to avoid being in the “hot seat”. You’re consistently “on the pot”, but will never “take a sh*t”. That’s clearly your prerogative, and I acknowledge that. I also have the prerogative to address it. This is how forums work. Welcome to the world of accountability and self-awareness. 😘

It’s ironic that you posted your comment as you’re literally who I was referring to when I posted this thread.

Over the past few months, I’ve made a conscious decision to not share my experiences with masseurs publicly. I now only share my experiences with members who have a record of sharing reviews on this site. And I only share them privately. Why? Because there are a lot of “serial bumpers” who inquire about masseurs/providers over and over, yet refuse to step out there and take the initial chance on their own. Although there’s always a risk with being “first”, it’s reasonable not to always leave it to someone else to step out on a new hire.