BigRic

So like, how did things get THAT FAR before it even occurred to him? How did you meet him? Teach me your secrets lol.

That's why I said "hear from/speak to." It is/can be a two-way communication street. Especially for those of us interested in duos.
 
In any event, the most important Good News is that the new JJ has received your seal of approval and is fit for consumption. Ever since I had so much fun with Vinny, I pay even more attention to your endorsements. LOL.

Welcome to the forum, @GR0981.
 
Unless it's super personal or salacious, I'd cautiously suggest going ahead and posting whatever your question is here so we might all enjoy/benefit. Please understand that if you're asking me about another "dancer" I may not be able to answer your question.
 
And if you're looking to hire me for perhaps a duo with another Adonis guy, by all means click my ad link (in my sig) and e-mail or text me directly.
 
(P.S. - You not being able to PM has to do with how I've adjusted my Privacy settings not your newness.)

Re "supply and demand on his side": Def a prob IMO with some of the Super Popular providers. And pride is a good point/an issue. One is arguably empowering that kinda problematic behavior if you continue pursuing a booking with an escort who does you like that.
 
FWIW if an emergency arose such that I had to cancel last minute on a (prospective) client like that, I'd proactively try to remedy it by offering an alternate time to 100% meet for perhaps a longer session for the same rate.

"I'm glad Trump won. Now we have a hot First Lady." --Alfie

Why? Acting as a profession is precisely that set of skills and abilities that enable a good actor to transform into whatever character they are asked to play. Most actors have defined ranges or limits of how much they can transform and remain believable, but the truly great ones are chameleons. I've dealt with a handful of actors over the years and attended a few classes when I was asked to observe. It's fascinating to see how malleable our outward presentations or personas are in real life. Most people go through life blissfully ignorant of how performative their "role" truly is in life. I believe the hetero/homo cultural dichotomy is largely constructed. There's far more overlap than many people are willing to comfortably admit.
 
More fundamentally, what is "GAY" about his performance? Is it the way he expressed tenderness or affection or the heat in his eyes when they were about to have sex? The erotic tension? All I saw on the screen was two people who were magnetically drawn to each other and how that played out. Actors are trained differently and I don't know who his teachers were, but I'd wager he was using powerful memories from his life (probably his first love) to create his emotive expressions and channel those feelings into his performance. What you saw as "GAY" was probably a witnessing of the first time he fell in love in real life and how it felt for him as expressed through the lenses of the script and character he was asked to create.
 
Also, remember, what we see on screen has been carefully constructed by a director, cinematographer, and editor to name just three of the key players. Again, styles vary, but sometimes many takes of a scene are required before the key players believe they "got it" for that scene. It's only in the editing and post-production work that all of those "got it" scenes are stitched together to create the movie we see. We have no idea if or how many times he may have been told to "give more passion!"

This was actually about the 10th time his handlers tried to transform Armie Hammer into a movie star. A dime-a-dozen pretty boy with minimal skills attempting the sow’s ear into silk purse thing.
 
Since his dual role in 2010 “Social Network,” essentially a stunt, he’s been in bomb after bomb, turd after turd. After the colossal Lone Ranger disaster — Disney lost more than $175 million! — most any other such actor would disappear into the Hollywood swamp. But Armie is a handsome, very rich white guy...so he keeps getting chances. (What a surprise!) I suspect it didn’t take much “convincing” to get him to take the role.
 
I also expect that if Armie doesn’t win a supporting Oscar for “Name,” it’ll be back to the minors. And if he does win, he’ll become a B-movie staple.

Lol now that you pointed it out ill leave it as an innuendo instead of correcting the typo.

LOL. <Butt-head voice> "Uhhh huh-huh. He said, ". . . deeper analization." Huh huh." </Butt-head voice>

This thread needs a gigantic tub of buttered popcorn to make it truly complete

Nice post (#13), @LivingnLA--you "had" me until "a truly 100% straight guy would be unable to top well because he wouldn't be able to get hard without medical assistance." You seem to be saying that "medical assistance" and "top[ping] well" are mutually exclusive. Am I reading/understanding you wrong? If not (and that's what you're saying), FWIW (from personal experience) I'd tend to disagree.

This discussion is interesting but in some ways misplaced. Are 'really straight' and 'straight identified' terms that make a distinction without a difference? I can understand people wanting their partners to conform to a certain set of stereotypes, and they have the right to question them to determine whether they do or not. The term 'imposter' is unhelpful and I would say presumptuous. People get to identify their sexuality as they see fit, and leaving aside the few who lie about it for whatever advantage (in this forum, commercial), no-one has the right to tell them that they are not what they say they are. Claiming that someone is not really straight because they do not conform to a set of stereotypes that an observer has decided upon assumes that stereotypes are definitive proof of someone's sexuality. In any other conversation in this forum a claim that stereotypes prove anything would be dismissed summarily.

At the risk of being labeled a broken record and consigned to the forum's dustbin, I shall repeat myself on this topic with a few minor changes.
 
What do you define as "real straight guy" versus "straight identified?"
 
As I have posted multiple times, the research and science on this is in very early days because human sexuality and identity are incredibly complex and surprisingly flexible given a variety of environmental incentives. Research generally seems to see a distinction between Sexual Orientation and Sexual Behavior Orientation. There may even be a Romantic or Affection Orientation. It's dreadfully tricky to "reduce" an organic analog life into neatly discrete categories and labels. Klein--the brilliant bisexual sexologist--did some very interesting work to try and capture a better picture in his "Grid" that is more comprehensive than Kinsey's famous scale.
 
I could go on and on, but the fact remains that identification is a very personal thing and how a person self-identifies is their truth. Unless you're planning to use a penile plethysmograph to measure a man's penile blood flow as a proxy for his sexual arousal to determine what turns him on, then what's the point?
 
As a man with a strong attraction to stereotypically straight men, I am indeed turned on by the thought of sexual activity with a "straight guy" because of such cultural tropes as "the thrill of the hunt" or "obtaining the unobtainable." It's all fantasy, but for me, since my first formative same-sex activities were with guys who were straight, it strongly affixed this kink of mine.
 
What gets really "fun" and interesting about all of this is how it intersects this particular hobby. Understanding the physiological and psychological "limitations" of these labels results in certain realities. For example, a 100% straight-identified man--what Kinsey would've called a zero--would not have any sexual arousal at same-sex porn and might even be physically repulsed by it. Klein would argue that interests change over time as life experiences affect us. Consider "situational sexual behavior" like homosexual activity in prison or the military or even "gay 4 pay" activity.
 
Hmm. I've rambled all over the place. I return to my original question: what is your definition of "real straight guy?"
 
I've had the fun and hot experience three times in my life of being the first man to suck three different guys who identified as straight at the time and still identify as straight. They said I was their best and we enjoyed many hot times where I could worship them and they could enjoy hot head and go home to their girlfriends/wives. However, those types of activities are somewhat rare. Especially now because Millennials are far more open and experimental. I imagine it's becoming more common to find a straight guy in his 20s who has been blown by a male friend and probably blown that friend too. We live in a more open and less restrictive time.
 
In my hiring, when I seek a worship or top scenario, the guy I seek is classically and stereotypically masculine from an American cultural perspective, because that's my kink. Yes, I prefer "straight guys" but a truly 100% straight guy would be unable to top well because he wouldn't be able to get hard without medical assistance. That means, I seek out men who are able to perform with men or women. I like tattoos and body hair. Muscles and that classically "cocky" borderline arrogant/asshole attitude of a confident dominant man who knows what he wants and takes it.

I've been in the same place I've always been, D: Right there in your phone, perhaps saved in contacts as "Smart Ass," awaiting a text invitation to what I'm sure was a nice dinner. Was your dinner "date" otherwise public info? Would I have known about it had I been posting on the forum more?
 
On to more important, Robert Mueller-worthy subjects: Although I'm sure you will be far too discreet to "kiss and tell," since you've stated in another thread that you " NEVER hire straight guys" and "NEVER hire guys who aren't enthusiastic kissers," me, Shylock and I bet some others are awaiting your review of our handsome boy with bated breath . . . and hardons.

BigRic where have you been? Nice to see you are still around. Quite a coincidence; I guess L.A. isn't all that big after all. Had I only know you certainly would have been welcome to join us.

Steve Young?

Anymore.
 
~Boomer~

Common courtesy is not common.

I wish someone would PM me..... I'm Lonely !

+1
 
I've gotten several really crude questions over the last 6 months or so. I don't consider myself a prude, but I also don't do crude. If it's someone that I have commented on in the forum, it is someone that I like. If you approach me like he's a piece of meat or some kind of cum receptical, it's unlikely that you're going to hear back.

That reminds me, next time you see Chris Eisenhower please give him my regards.
 
~Boomer~

LOL so ironic, @Epigonos. Ryan, um, came to you right after me. If I'd known you were the 4 o'clock and you and he were amenable, I could have joined him for dinner with you. Whatever could we have talked about? We may have turned as many heads in the restaurant as Ryan and I seemingly did working out together yesterday morning. (Thanks again, Ryan.)
 
@Vegasguy: Um, yeah, bro--you should be alll good. LOL.

Threads are not necessary with Tristan, his name comes up in multiple threads which are not about him, until of course his name comes up and then the thread is about him for pages. Just as this one will likely make that turn.

can you imagine??!!
 
despite the multiple threads, will we ever get to the point that the initials "RS" are instantly recognizable around here?......