pubic_assistance

That's a broad statment that I don't know is true. Is it "most" ? The few times I've hired escorts ..yes. I go for the deluxe model that I am too old to land on my own, anymore. But I've seen guys on rent.men who aren't even as good looking as me. So I think its all about what you're aiming for. I don't think everyone necessarily hires people who wouldn't look twice at them outside of a professional realm. But for those who were not fortunate to have been born with good looks...escorting is a blessing to be able to feel beautiful to someone for an hour or two even if they're being paid to do so

Do you really ?

I think its a common misconception that people always hire escorts because they can't get laid without paying. Sometimes you just want WHAT you want WHEN you want and HOW you want it.

Oh. There were some Poiish families where I grew up who I assume were descendents of some Slavic group that were super hairy. I remembered those guys had chest hair at 13! (And back hair by high school.) Very very black hair. Very masculine looking guys. (Unfortunately so were their sisters) bushy mustache on the girls and looked as butch as their brothers. Hopefully they went on to be Lesbians

If that were actually the boy next door...I'd be borrowing many cups of sugar, daily.

I don't really watch much porn. Doesn't do much for me. I am speaking from the observation of experiences. I've been in many dungeons that have that table but never seen it at a masseur's place.

A "milking table" tends to me more BDSM Dungeon furniture than massage equipment.

So a bald cock and balls doesn't look like you haven't reached puberty ? I remember being anxious to get my bush on. I was a late-bloomer compared to some of the other boys in Junior High school who were from a more hairy ethnicity than I. A hairless cock or vag looks like kiddie porn to me. I ponder the reason why people find it attractive. I personally like a full bush and a matching treasure trail.

Fascinating fact. Thanks for sharing.

Yes. A reasonable conclusion. Unfortunately the broad stroke gathered up too many who DO need institutionalizing. The States gleefully pretend to be protecting their civil rights to save money housing them and waiting for them to die in the streets. There was a fellow last year who used to eat out of my garbage cans. I would see him and offer him food from my kitchen. I understand he froze to death over the winter while sleeping in a doorway.

Yeah. Sorry ..I misunderstood. I thought he was talking about having all the pubic hair removed. Women have been waxing all their hair like that and I always found it creepy. So I thought he was considering doing the same

Which is the core defect in the legal arguments for mentally ill. There's an obvious point at which some people are a danger to themselves. What good are civil rights when you can't care for yourself ?

My spam folder is still as full as it normally would be after a week. Might be a matter of what email services you are all using. Perhaps those of you who are noticing a difference are all using the same service. That could be worrisome indeed, if your provider is determining by itself what is and isn't spam without letting you have the final say.

The release of the mentally ill was 1980. The debate was 1988. I was 17 in 1988. It had been eight years since they opened the institutions. The majority of patients had left and many of them ended up in jail. So the subject of the debate was precisely about the fall out of the Civil Rights decision that allowed mentally ill people to "self determine". Again....the issue has nothing to do with my age. Facts are facts no matter how old I was when I researched the subject. The facts also have not changed over 40 years.

I prefer to be greeted in gym shorts and maybe a tank top. Sexier when you flip over and discover them to now be naked. 😈

Ass crack I understand. Balls and shaft ? WHY ? Wouldn't you come out looking like a pre-pubescent teenager ? Is that the look you are going for ? I know women are shaving their pussy clean now. Makes me feel like I'm a child molester. Not a fan.

Like I said. The information about the subject was the same 40 years ago, as it was today. There was a scandal in the media over the investigation of a few institutions that had truly become awful, abusive and derelict. It wasn't all of them or even many of them. My statement which remains true no matter how old I was when I did the research was that MOST of the mental institutions took good care of the patients. That's all. I don't need to be a PhD to find those facts. They were readily available by the late 1980s. My opinion is that Governments took advantage of the political climate and were happy to give mentally ill patients their "rights to self determination" because it was far cheaper than housing them, medicating them and feeding them. Sadly most ended up in jail where they were NOT cared for properly. Only fed and housed.

Probably the majority in the US.

Perhaps true. But most 20 somethings live in a fantasy world of social media pages. They seek constant validation and ACTUALLY meeting up with someone doesn't allow them to use the necessary glamor filters to achieve the full effect.

I am confused by this statement. I didn't claim to BE "an expert". I claimed to be informed and knowledgeable on the subject. Which I am. Did the facts change over the last 40 years ? No they did not. The institutions closed 40 years ago...so the reports on the quality of life in each is the same as it was 40 years ago. You can't investigate any further than what was done. As far as my being a high school student....what makes you assume that I was too dumb to do quality research ? My statement stands: The media exaggerated the point about a few outlier institutions that had lost their standards. For the most part, the mental institutions in the United States provided a decent quality of life for thousands of people with serious mental problems. FAR better than the mere food and housing they ended up with in prison.

What don't you understand ? I did a lot of research on the subject because it was the topic of our junior debate championship. It was about ten years after the mental institutions has released thousands of people and a huge majority of them had landed in jail.

To her credit...( and really BOTH my parents )...when I was going through my gay phase in my 20s, they never batted an eyelash and always supported me in any relationships I was involved in. The only flack I ever got was when I was 14 years old and came home covered in hickies ....from my then, girlfriend who was 17 and you could probably just smell the sex on me. When I started experimenting with men, I (jokingly) blamed my mother for making a big deal about having sex with a girl and said it was all her fault. 😝

No. Read again. I said: Primarily, the cost of running separate facilities was the more likely consideration.

I wouldn't even mind that as much as the constant requests to see photos of my erect penis ( and then asking "how big is it" ) after they've already SEEN it ! 😳