BtmBearDad

This is one fella I need to see naked! 
 

On 3/24/2023 at 7:40 AM, BaronArtz said:

I am not a huge fan of tattoos, but I don't mind them.

I agree - not a huge fan either, but on him, (and a select few others), they work 🤷🏼‍♂️

May I ask you to share his IG and OF links/names via PM? 
 

20 hours ago, Gymowner said:

not another totally hot "straighter" stud getting fucked by trannies.

You’d be surprised how many big, muscular guys like him are crazy for pre-op trannies. A number of years ago, before the place shut down, there was this bartender at one of the best known gay bars/clubs in NYC. He was stunning. No ink, but a very well built, muscled up NY Italian. He was quite the charmer, and very flirty. Even if he wasn’t your type, he was a man you could look at and say “wow he’s hot”. He was gay, but he was only interested in pre-op trans or as he called them, “big titted, functioning she-males”. We became friendly as my group frequented the place regularly. While he said he was “100% vers”, he admitted to preferring to bottom. But he said he needed a pair of tits in face when he bottomed, not hairy muscled pecs. He offered to include me in a session on more than one occasion, and while the idea of seeing him naked, and bottoming was tempting, I did politely decline his offers. 

If Valentino shares the same preferences as my former bartender - so what? Different strokes for different folks and all that. 

As a hobbyist, I’d be interested most in his performance with run of the mill gay men - as a top and bottom. There’s definitely something about him 😉

BBD 

4 hours ago, KensingtonHomo said:

We can just eliminate this department entirely. 

They’ve tried - since 1938 lol but DOI, or I suppose more properly, it’s functions are enshrined in the city’s charter. As I said, they’re not well liked or regarded. A more humourless, self important group of basically frustrated/wanna be LE types you’ll never meet. 

51 minutes ago, KensingtonHomo said:

All that said, is it a good use of our public money to investigate a Twitter account? 

I’m not disagreeing with this sentiment at all, but there is a large department within the City government that does just that, and more - the Department of Investigation. They’re supposed to be the ones that vet any candidate for appointment or promotion, and they’re staffed by a good combination of law enforcement nepo babies, and frustrated LE types that couldn’t make the cut with the NYPD or FBI or even the DA’s office. They actually encourage snitching on co-workers for anything from “inappropriate behaviour” outside of work, to being in a Su-Zu, to moonlighting, to actual criminal activity. They also try to make city employees act as “undercover” agents by saying never to decline a bribe before talking to them first to set up a sting. They’re not well liked or regarded, and often times, inept at their job. 

3 hours ago, azdr0710 said:

attention readers!.....as often happens here in The Deli, there are now two providers being discussed with hotlinks for both......if you pursue a meeting, make sure he's the one you think you're meeting!......

I think this is all my fault 😬 I shared how viewing the thread title, my mind thought of a porn performer with a similar name, and so some confusion began. 

Mea culpa one and all! 

16 minutes ago, TorontoDrew said:

Very nice.  Lists smoking but not kissing so not for me.

I don’t even know what some mean smoking - cigarettes, vaps, pot? I thought he listed as not in session? That wouldn’t bother me terribly - but if asked, and he declined kissing, that would be a deal breaker.