maninsoma

I'd say that the newer Sean Cody models are consistent in quality with the majority of Sean Cody models over time -- attractive, certainly, but nothing exceptional. I think the issue is that it's been quite a while since they added someone to their roster that has the extreme good looks of someone like Nixon (to give just one example where I was gobsmacked when I first saw him). Sean Cody used to add extremely good looking guys to their roster with some regularity, but it seems like it's been quite a while since anyone gave me a "Wow!" reaction upon first seeing him.

Oh, hell to the no!

Oh, hell to the no!

I watched the entire series when it first aired and I definitely had a love-hate relationship with it. The love part was that it was good to have TV series that focused on gay characters. The other love part was Robert Gant. The hate part was that the quality generally was lacking. Apart from the sexy scenes, it could be difficult to watch because it was just too soap operaish for my taste. Good to see that Robert Gant still looks hot.

Like most issues, this one isn't as black and white as so many people seem to want it to be. There is a selfishness to suicide, if you want to use that language, since it's true that the person who commits suicide may be "solving" his/her problems the only way he/she sees how in the moment without thinking about that solution's aftermath. It seems particularly horrible when children are involved. So what? If you focus only on that, then you miss the other side of the equation. Unless one is talking about a sober, end-of-life contemplation that a terminally ill person might engage in, suicidal ideation isn't about logic. It's about emotion. Despair. Inner demons. In some cases, thinking altered by substance abuse. And so on. To suggest that someone suffering in this way should only focus on how his actions would impact others evidences a lack of understanding about just how bleak that person's inner monologue has become or, in many cases, just how bleak that inner monologue has been for a long, long time. They very well may be considering others when making a decision to take their own lives and have convinced themselves that not only will they be better off dead but that everyone around them will ultimately be better off with them gone.

Quite a list of TV credits, though most of them were guest star appearances. I really enjoyed his work on Soap.

I've noticed more than one escort here begin his career by advertising as a bottom or versatile bottom who later changed their ads to indicate top or versatile top. Now, it may be that their proclivities changed over time but I've wondered whether it's just a reflection that it's easier to attract clients as a top.

The Congressional Republicans did get a lot of what they want -- huge tax cuts for the very wealthy and loosening or reversing of regulations on a variety of businesses. The only hat trick they haven't completely pulled off yet is eliminating the Affordable Care Act. Sure, some of them have had to hold their noses to get along with Trump but the reason the GOP decided to embrace him when his success in the primary was becoming evident is that they knew that even if he was morally repugnant that he would deliver on the mantra of "reward the rich and screw everyone else."

Maybe the same percentage as escorts who say that about their clients? Seriously, there's no reason to be so dour about it.

Someone did do a more analogous video of Pet Clark's version (sung in French), syncing with dancing from Carousel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEItEo_3aa8

I didn't remember that Dee Dee Sharp had recorded a cover version of Neil Sedaka's Calendar Girl with the gender switched. This appears to be simply a homemade video using random still photos. Someone really should make a video to Dee Dee's recording that mirror's Neil's only using men instead of women and, if available, some shots of Dee Dee singing the song. In case anyone needs to refresh his/her memory of the original, here's Neil's video.

I think this most recent issue has more to do with racism than SESTA/FOSTA. Maybe the flight attendant assumed sex trafficking of a very young child was involved, but more than likely the flight attendant simply assumed the child was kidnapped since the color of the skin and last name of the child didn't match the mother.

I made one friend out of the many men I've hired, and it's someone I hired significantly more often than anyone else. If I made a list of all the men I hired, there would probably be only a few guys I hired more than two or three times, though, and I wouldn't expect a friendship to develop with someone I only met a couple of times. A friendship between a provider and client needs to be a two-way street, just like any other friendship, and it cannot be forced. There has to be a genuine mutual interest in each other outside of the business relationship for it to work.

I think this is the same Grayson who used to live in San Francisco (around a decade ago). If it is the same guy, I had a fun though weird appointment with him. He was definitely a cutie but he seemed really into verbalizing the fantasy that I was his dad or foster dad and he was under age. I kept redirecting him because I did not find that fantasy a turn on, but he kept returning to the daddy/little boy talk. If it's the same guy, he would be in his 30s now, not 25 as stated in the ad. He definitely wasn't underage when I met him; he appeared to be in his early to mid 20s at that time.

I'm confused by the title of this thread compared with the content of the first post. Based on the title, I thought it might make sense for someone who owns his home to get a reverse mortgage in order to have more money to have fun while still alive. If you don't care about passing any assets on upon your death, why not spend more during your life? But the suggestion in the OP is not to actually obtain cash to pay for fun now. It's to basically write a promissory note to an escort that he will be paid at some point down the road, that point being the OP's death. What escort is going to agree to that? Even if the escort trusts that you won't change your will at the last minute to name a different beneficiary it would require the escort to work for no payment for the foreseeable future and could easily be challenged in court after your death by any remaining relatives. Is an escort going to want to engage in proceedings challenging the will when that involves him revealing what sort of services he provided in order to be named as a beneficiary?

If this guy is legit then all I have to say is YUM, at least to the photos. https://rentmasseur.com/Davidwood Given that he has three different travel cities listed for the same time over the next 30 days, though, I'm smelling something fishy. I guess it could just be that he's hoping someone in one of those places will pay for his airfare in order to facilitate a meeting.

Maybe the super long acronym needs two Qs, then, since I have always understood the Q to refer to "questioning" and not "queer." I agree that the more identities that got added to that acronym the more unwieldy it became. An acronym should be a short-hand way to say something. If you have to say LGBTQQIAA (and maybe there are other letters I'm forgetting) it's probably easier to simply remember and say all the words in full.

Bumping this thread up. I'm surprised no one has hired him yet -- or, at least, no one has hired him and posted about it here. I definitely like his photos.

Now, I have met Chad and have posted about him before, as have others. I don't tend to repeat too many times with most guys so I don't have recent experience with him, but I've never read anything negative about him.

Not sure where you searched for reviews, but Brody Stone has five reviews on Daddysreviews (you have to look under All, not just Active, since the last review was posted over three years ago. I know he's been discussed here as well. I'm not sure whether any of the others have been discussed anywhere. I looked at the ads and none of them look familiar. Since I regularly look at erotic massage and escort ads in the area, I suspect that all or at least some of them were under the "therapeutic" category until Masseurfinder decided to put all advertisers in the same group.

I had a guy hit me up on OKCupid. Cute, and seemed eager to meet. I typically would rather meet for coffee first, but he wanted to meet for dinner. We set a time and place (somewhere close to where he lived that I had never heard of). Researching the restaurant, it seemed a bit high end for a first date meeting with a stranger. He sent me a message a few hours before we were to meet stating that he expected me to pay for dinner. Now, I have certainly paid for men's dinners before and have also paid for men's company, but I didn't like this guy's MO -- not to mention the fact that if I was going to hire someone that evening I could have hired someone more attractive than him. I basically replied by calling off the meeting and letting him know that if he was attempting to find a sugar daddy he should be more upfront about it. Guess I'm lucky that he at least told me prior to our actually meeting, but honestly if I were put in the position these women were I'd simply pay for my own portion of the check and tell the restaurant that they would have to pursue the deadbeat to get what was due from him. Why should anyone feel obligated to pay for a stranger's meal? I know it would be an uncomfortable scene, but what is the restaurant going to do? Call the cops on you after you've paid for your meal because you didn't pay for some dude you just met?

Max has been discussed here quite a lot -- to my memory, always in positive terms. Since his name is so short, you cannot search effectively for previous threads using the forum software. You can do the following Google search to find the threads about him: max francisco site:m4m-forum.org I'm not sure any of the others have been discussed here previously. Hugo looks familiar and I thought he had been mentioned here, but I couldn't find a thread mentioning him.

What's particularly annoying is people using leave blowers and not picking up the leaves. When I first moved to California, I stayed with friends and was awakened every morning by someone using a leaf blower in a parking lot. The person just blew the leaves to the small patch of ground surrounding the lot. Of course within a short time the wind had blown the leaves all over the place again. Seemed to stupid to me that a business would pay someone to do the same task every day who wasn't getting anything accomplished.

When I click to get his phone number under Contact Me, I see "Phone is not available for this user." I also don't see it in the text of his ad. Where are you seeing the phone number? Maybe this is one of those things with Rentmen where you'll see one thing if you are logged in and another if you are browsing the site without being logged in?

Maybe a fake ad? What makes me suspicious is that he indicates he prefers to be contacted by text yet there is no phone number listed in his ad. https://rentmen.eu/LeonCastle