maninsoma

I'm far from an expert on "gay for pay" men, but I thought one of the main things a lot of them won't do is open mouth kissing because that seems more intimate than letting a guy blow you or fucking an ass. Generally the BelAmi guys are versatile on film, so they obviously don't have the sort of rigidity that some g4p performers have. But I liken passionate, open mouth kissing to someone who clearly was excited by the sex he was having and pulls out (whether it be an ass or a mouth) to ejaculate immediately. If you notice, most BelAmi scenes have edits after the dick comes out of the ass, and then there is a brief bit of jacking off until the top ejaculates. In other words, very few of those guys actually cum from fucking.

Maybe it's because a lot of those guys don't identify as gay so they aren't very passionate about kissing other men? I like the looks of a lot of BelAmi's models but a lot of the scenes are mechanical, not particularly exciting, and I assume that's because the models aren't really enjoying M-M sex but are just going through the motions for cash.

One of my favorite sleazebag stories about Travis Kalanick: Even after all of the bad press and the supposed efforts to rehabilitate the image of Uber (and for him to personally behave more professionally), he decided to use a women's lactation room to meditate and the company's board members were stupid enough to publicize this as if it was an indication about Travis' spiritual growth as opposed to evidence that an entitled straight white man who has a private office instead decided to take over a space devoted to new mothers. In the grand scheme of things not the biggest offense Travis committed, but it was just so tone deaf after everything that came before that I honestly could not believe he and the Uber board could be so stupid.

Now that rates aren't posted in RentMen ads, I think you'll have to contact him to ask.

Now that rates aren't posted in RentMen ads, I think you'll have to contact him to ask.

https://rentmen.eu/SFGoodBoy

Burning Man is now in Rome?

Only because you kept quoting me with responses that suggested that I didn't know what I was talking about. I think we can both agree that (a) San Francisco is expensive relative to most other places in the U.S. and (b) it's much less expensive to eat at home, but most people don't think of having a home prepared meal as going out on a date.

I live here, too, so you cannot just make up stuff and expect not to be challenged: I can order a footlong cold cut combo at Subway near Van Ness and Market right now for $4.99 (seems like a sale price; I think it's normally $5.99). Sandwiches at Safeway are now $6.99, but if you buy sandwiches there regularly you probably get one free for every 6 or 7 you buy in a month, making the effective cost about $6. Maybe you go to Ike's instead (or another higher quality sandwich shop) where, in fact, the least expensive sandwich is $9. I'm not trying to argue that eating out in San Francisco is generally inexpensive, just that if one is on a limited budget or simply wants to buy prepared food and doesn't want to spend a lot for it, there are places where meals can still be had for $10 or less.

He had personal issues, but they made one hell of an album together billed as Allman and Woman titled Two The Hard Way. It was largely panned by critics and not well received by the public in general, but it's one of my favorite albums Cher has done.

A burrito and water. A few tacos and an agua fresca. It can be done, though I agree that (as with almost everything else in this world) food at a taqueria costs more now than it did even 10 years ago.

I live in one of the most expensive cities in the U.S. Coming up with a price of an "average" date is nonsensical if the date includes dinner (and this survey included dinner for two). You can go out to an inexpensive place (yes, they still exist in San Francisco) for around $20 for two people (I'm talking about taquerias and hamburger places here, and not the new ones that try to pretend to be high end so they can jack up the price). You can go to a place with actual table service with decent food for anywhere from $30 to $70, depending on how much food you want and whether you are drinking any alcohol with your meal. You can go to nicer places and spend around $120 or so for a good meal for two. Or you can go to a truly fine dining establishment and pay hundreds of dollars per person. I assume that people who make a lot of money here are able to go on dates to restaurants in the latter category, but even though such places are beyond most people's reach it doesn't mean that people without much disposable income cannot go out on a dinner date that seems special to them. As far as movie tickets, I think that most films produced by Hollywood are garbage so I seldom go to a theater. I understand that there are monthly passes that one can buy that allow one to see either unlimited or a very high number of movies per month, and those only cost about $10 per month. So, if anything, perhaps $8 for a movie ticket is a high estimate for people who like to go to movies often since you might as well buy one of those passes instead of paying for each ticket.

If I'm following you correctly, the frustration isn't so much about where you live but when you visit somewhere that when you contact escorts who advertise in the area that it turns out they aren't actually there. I get your point -- it happens where I live quite often and is sometimes obvious because the ad will give a variety of areas where the escort will be over a several weeks' long period, with the entire duration listed for each destination. There are also men who live an hour's drive away who have ads as if they live in my city, and while they may be willing to travel to me there is no indication in many ads that if I wanted to do an in call that they are actually not that close to me. My suggestion to you: Just contact men in advance if you have a trip planned and you are browsing ads in advance of the trip. Assuming you get timely responses, at least you would know before you arrive who's actually available in the area.

You believe that nonsense? Sounds like something out of the 1950s.

I'm not an escort, but I can state with certainly that sometimes texts can go undelivered even though you do not realize it on your end. I have sat side by side with a couple of friends, looked at their Hangouts of Messages conversations with me, and discovered messages that were obviously sent by one party that are not displayed on the other party's device, without any icon or warning that the text was unsuccessful. It's one reason why I know not to assume that a lack of response to a single text means anything; it could just mean that the other person didn't even receive the text. And, of course, this doesn't even address the other issue: if someone received multiple texts at the same time, some might be noticed but forgotten almost immediately. One traveling escort who visits my area frequently always sends me texts when he's visiting, but he tends to do so in the middle of a weekday when I'm at work and cannot open his texts since he tends to send nude photos along with his travel plans. Since I dismiss the text, I frequently don't even remember getting one from him by the time my work day is over. (Not that it matters in terms of me hiring him again as that's unlikely to happen anyway for other reasons.)

I have been aware of this guy for a long time but have never hired him. To my knowledge, he has been asked about here a few times before but since he has changed names at least a few times it's difficult to find the previous discussions. For someone so attractive it's surprising that none of the threads resulted in people who hired him singing his praises. I'm not saying he received negative feedback. Rather it's as if no one who reads this forum has hired him, even though he's been around a long time. He does have some reviews on Daddy's, though only two are available to read and they are both from first time reviewers. Look for Billy in San Jose. Even though some of his ads make it appear that he lives in San Francisco, I think the ones that indicate his location is San Jose are probably correct since older ads always indicated a willingness to travel to San Francisco, not to host here. It's that that has probably caused me not to hire him because I am generally reluctant to have guys I haven't met come to my place and I am disinclined to take the train to San Jose (and then a cab to someone's house) unless I'm sure it will be an excellent experience. Some of his previous (or maybe current, on other websites) names: Billy, Ricky, BiLatin Ricky. I really wish some forum regular(s) would hire him and either post new reviews or some feedback here. I would make the trip to see him if I knew for certain he was worth it since I find his photos so sexy.

Obviously people are interpreting the word "legendary" in different ways. I don't even consider someone who's done a lot of porn whom I find incredibly hot to necessarily be legendary, but that seems to be the definition a lot of posters are using.

It surprises me that no one has yet mentioned Joey Stefano. At one point, he was the "it" bottom boy in porn. Though I never found him that appealing, of the men listed so far I have to acknowledge that Jeff Stryker was legendary. Brent Corrigan probably belongs in the group, too, since his beginning while underaged ultimately led two other sick men to murder the studio producer working with Brent, and that story was ultimately made into a movie. And Jack Wrangler definitely belongs in the group; for those who haven't seen the documentary about him, it's quite fascinating. Though I don't know that I could call him legendary, of the others listed I have to acknowledge my fascination with John Davenport. Not the most handsome (though still cute), but he was so sexy with his ability to shoot copious amounts of cum long distances. I have always admired men who can shoot like that.

If the escort slipped something into the tequila, I think it was probably something other than ecstasy. You haven't described experiencing any of the psychological effects which cause some people to want to use E, namely the euphoric, horny, want-to-be-loving-towards-everyone trip. A lot of drugs can cause the symptoms you described, but the first widely used "party" drug that occurs to me is meth.

If you are trying to suggest that David is much more attractive than Neil, I beg to differ. They are both sexy men.

Even though you are so far the lone voice in this thread to cite this reason, it's the first thing I thought of as well. In previous generations it would be obvious if someone was taking a photo. Today someone can appear to be simply using one's phone and take surreptitious photos of strangers. Those photos can then be shared online quite easily without the subject's knowledge or permission. Perhaps these young men were simply trying to prevent having naked photos of themselves presented for the world to see.

Probably not. Not to derail this thread into politics any further than it's already gone, but Clinton won the Coachella Valley as a whole with about 75% of the vote. (Source: https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/12/07/desert-voted-overwhelmingly-clinton-and-weed/95111550/) And if that's the numbers of the entire valley, then I assume that the men who are hiring masseurs probably voted for Clinton in an even larger margin since gay men, as a whole, trend towards the Democratic Party over the GOP.

Whatever it is, if the masseurs in question are actually doing massage as a profession versus some side gig to make a little money here and there it certainly reveals a lack of sense and professionalism. Why pay for an ad and then ignore potential customers for no reason? I have previously read that some guys won't reply if they cannot do so within a fairly short period of time because they assume you will have moved on to someone else anyway, but (a) I think that makes more sense for escorts and masseurs and (b) it doesn't even make much sense for escorts, either, unless the inquiry clearly requests not to get a response unless the escort is available within a certain time frame.

Sorry to hear that. In my experience, unless the diarrhea is related to food poisoning (which in most people resolves itself fairly quickly) or a minor illness the symptoms do not go away until treated. The good news -- again, from my experience; I am not a doctor -- is that if you do have some sort of parasitic or other infection that's causing this, you will feel significantly better within the first 24 hours of taking the medication (but be sure to take the entire course that's prescribed since the problem may return with a vengeance if you do not completely eliminate the infectious agent). The time to eat yogurt and other foods with "good" gut bacteria is after your treated since, unfortunately, these medications kill the good along with the bad.

That's too bad since different medications are used to treat different types of infections. I can understand prescribing something immediately, before the infectious agent is known, if the symptoms are severe and presenting medical risks or are just extremely difficult to live with because that happened to me once. Turns out that the doctor's initial guess was wrong, though, so I ended up being prescribed something different after the stool samples were analyzed. Taking both Cipro and then Flagyl is not pleasant, so if it's possible to wait for treatment until test results are done that would be my recommendation.