maninsoma

I'm not normally into fur, but DAMN -- that is one sexy man!

I'm sure that the clients with whom you played talked with other clients and that's what caused your sudden surge of inquiries for more "extras." That's why I am always hesitant to provide too much information about what transpired between a particular masseur and me. I have no idea whether that masseur's behavior with me was his normal level of service or whether I got something extra due to chemistry or timing or some other reason. I think it's reasonable for prospective clients to want to have some idea of what they can expect when they hire a masseur that is charging way above the normal rate for a therapeutic only massage, but I think it's unwise for people to discuss masseurs in the same way they do escorts. If someone really wants "full service," he should be contacting an escort and not a masseur anyway even though I have had a few fortunate encounters were some masseurs and I hit it off and they ended up providing much more than sensual massages.

I cannot give you feedback about any of those masseurs, but in terms of searching the forum software isn't great unless you are searching for something that's likely to have only a few search results (e.g., an unusual name). Also, if the name is only three letters you cannot search using the forum software at all since search terms have to be at least four characters. Use Google search instead. For example, for Cory you might do the following search in Google: "Cory site:m4m-forum.org" You'll still be stuck with search results that are for different Corys, but at least you will have better organized results. It's much easier when the name isn't so common.

Yet another new ad in the area that seems very similar to the others. Oddly this guy uses the name Piplo in his title but the opening line of the text in his ad gives his name as David. https://rentmen.eu/PIPLO

That seems odd that a masseur would change his practice with a client he's been seeing for that long. I understand being hesitant to offer anything beyond a therapeutic massage to a new client if the masseur is worried about entrapment, but an existing client?

The first few have a similar hunky look. I know I'm skeptical by nature, but when multiple new ads appear at the same time with similar characteristics I become suspicious. Already the photos of Kevinkeywes seem to have been removed. I'd love to be proven wrong -- particularly with respect to Rolamdo, who is simply over-the-top yummy -- so if anyone here meets one or more of these gentlemen I'd love to hear back that he was everything you expected.

He also advertises on massage websites, but I agree with your point since the link provided was to his escort ad.

I am not saying that I don't ask for details. What I am saying is that not being able to say much or show much about the services being offered has surely reduced traffic to guys' ads.

I cannot share feedback from masseurs because I haven't hired anyone within the past month, but here is my issue: In the past, it was already somewhat risky to have to read in between the lines about how erotic a massage might be. Just because a guy had half naked photos didn't mean the massage would be particularly erotic. Just because a guy had higher than therapeutic massage rates didn't mean the massage would be erotic. Just because a guy chose to put an ad in the "sensual" category on MF didn't mean the massage would be anything more than therapeutic. With the changes to MF (mixing therapeutic and sensual, censoring ads, and not displaying phone numbers between midnight and 6am) I wouldn't be inclined to hire anyone off that site. At least Rentmasseur still has useful ads, but I get the impression that far fewer clients know about that website.

Actually, one of the drawbacks of reviews of scammers is that unless the scammer actually uses his own photos and/or continues to use the same escort name and contact information, a review or even a warning will only help others for a very short period of time. Already someone has mentioned that the Rent.men profile is gone. I didn't see this thread or the RM ad until now, so I have no idea whom this warning is about other than that there was some guy using the name Rochardxx. I'm not intending the discourage others from trying to be helpful; I'm just pointing out the facts. The same thing even happens with positive discussions in the message center. I cannot tell you how many times I have hoped to find feedback on an escort or masseur who is using a fairly standard and common name (e.g., Richard) and I cannot tell from the threads I find whether the discussion pertains to the person whose ad I am currently seeing since the discussions link to ads that no longer exist. What this does underscore is what we all already know -- it's definitely safest to hire guys with an established reputation.

I am more cautious than that. I will wait outside of my residence so I can make sure the guy who arrives is the person I am expecting.

If a guy's look has changed significantly, then I would prefer to just see what he looks like now. Some guys have photos when they are younger and clean cut and then photos obviously taken later, after many tattoos and, in some cases, years of hard living based on the changes in facial appearance. It's somewhat disturbing to click on an ad based on a main photo that shows an image that appeals to me only to discover newer photos attached to the ad that depict an image of someone I wouldn't want to even meet, much less hire. I've never met Colin but I just scrolled though his photos on Rentmen. He looks basically the same throughout though he is obviously older in some photos. The only big difference is that his hair changed significantly in one photo (I assume the blond hair was a result of bleaching since he looks more natural with darker hair). If I were to contact him and that was important to me, I would ask before booking what his hair is like today. So, to answer your question, I don't mind this kind of collection of photos because all of them seem representative of what he likely looks like today. It's only when someone morphs into an entirely different look that I am bothered by someone including old photos in his ad.

The third episode was the worst so far. I didn't even feel like the lines that were written were zingers. It was just a whiny dramedy where it was obvious the setup was going to be to make the teen character so despicable that the audience will actually support Roseanne's physical abuse towards her. Not funny but definitely offensive to me. I actually have liked the other episodes so far even though it's obvious that the reboot is trying way too hard to tackle "issues."

If I could like your post multiple times, I would. Even though I'm someone who has been comfortable hiring guys for a long time, I still take offense when someone hits me up, has a conversation with me as if he is interested, and then waits until very late in the game to let me know he expects to be paid. If someone is looking for compensation, that better be clear within the first message or two or there is no way I'd hire the guy simply because I don't like being manipulated and having someone waste my time.

He's sexy. I don't know anything about him. Perhaps you can edit the thread title to include his home base? Maybe that would catch the eye of someone who knows him.

I think one's Facebook experience has a lot to do with what one makes of it. Just like every other website I visit regularly, I am highly selective about what and whom I engage with. I have a few "friends" who occasionally post stuff that seems like propaganda, but for the most part what I see on Facebook are posts from friends and acquaintances about what is going on in their lives. People's vacation experiences. People's social outings. And because of my personal interests, I will see posts of hot men, drag queens, and delicious food. I think this website is similar. One can limit one's participation here to specific topics and areas of interest, or one can give it more importance than that. I'm not suggesting that Facebook and the Message Forum are equivalent in terms of social impact. I don't think Russian bots are among us trying to sway members' political opinions because we are very small fish in a very large pond. I have some understanding of Facebook's failings and agree that it deserves scrutiny at the national level. I am merely suggesting that, like any other online resource, Facebook can be used in different ways.

Of course you could take your own advice since I assume that you, too, have an anus. You don't have to be a total top either. Try bottoming again. You might find out that you like it.

I'd say that Drag Race frequently shows the best of people but sometimes also shows less than admirable behavior. One might think the producers deliberately try to stir up s****, but the queens have to be willing to participate in that nastiness for it to make it to video. Some seasons are better than others in terms of group dynamics focusing on common interest and support. The current season seems to have at least a couple of people who simply like creating drama with other people.

I guess I have different "red flags" than a lot of you. My red flags: 1. I search the phone number and find an escort/massage ad for a woman or preop MTF transgender woman. 2. The price is as high as an escort rate and the ad text is entirely vague as to what service is being offered. 3. Image search leads to some other person online who is highly unlikely to be in my area offering massage. 4. I have seen the photos for a long time and they never change.

Women's marches predate Trump's election. So do student protests and consumer boycotts. Some of those actions/protests resulted in changes in businesses' practices, others not so much. It's the same today. I suppose if you want to be specific, the #MeToo phenomenon is new, but it isn't like no one had previously disclosed sexual harassment or assault. What I meant by fantasy land is that the author seems to think we have passed the tipping point where there are so many people who are saying "enough is enough" to issues like gun violence, sexual violence, and general prejudice that, from a business perspective, it's toxic to associate with people like Trump or Roseanne Barr. When I wrote I was sympathetic with that point of view, what I meant was that I wished I had the same pair of rose colored glasses. I simply do not think that the hearts and minds of that many people have changed over the past 18 months.

I am sympathetic with this columnist's point of view, but I think Dean Obeidallah is living in fantasy land. There is no clear anti-Trump, anti-bigotry movement in this country that didn't already exist prior to Trump's election. Yes, some people will not watch Roseanne because of who she is, and maybe some of those people will entirely abandon ABC because they are airing the show. On the other hand, there very well may be an equivalent number of people who will turn in precisely because of Roseanne's views, and then a lot of people who will watch the show because they enjoy it and don't really care about Roseanne's political views.

Many years ago I worked with a short, muscular Latino guy who used to like to punch my shoulder. It took me several requests to get him to stop. I'm not sure why he thought it was appropriate behavior with someone he ostensibly liked, but at the time I simply attributed it to him wanting to appear macho even though he was a short muscle queen.

At least guys can still post photos wearing tank tops, which give a good idea of someone's physique. I have even noticed a few guys wearing casual shirts that are unbuttoned all the way, showing at least part of their chests and stomachs. But who knows, maybe MasseurFinder will soon start insisting that no flesh be shown other than face and hands.

The "About Me" section of his ad doesn't even make sense. Beyond the fact that it reads like a client review and not the masseur describing himself, the actual words are confusing. Is he or is he not "real?" I am sure he is real, but he is not the guy in the pictures and he will likely take your iTunes gift card and provide you nothing in return.

If it were true that Trump had taken actions that freed hundreds of children every month from being sexually exploited, I assume that would have received widespread media attention by now as it would be an accomplishment that even I would give him credit for, and I hate almost everything he does and says. Instead, what I found online was the usual: fake news from Trump supporters trying to pretend that he is responsible for a dramatic increase in arrests and prosecutions of sex traffickers with more informed websites actually breaking out the facts to reveal that, in fact, many of the arrests Trump has been given credit for are related to operations that began before he took office and the vast majority of the arrests counted were consensual contacts between adults, not examples of human trafficking. But Trump supporters never let facts get in their way.