maninsoma

I only watched a minute. I didn't find his personality annoying, but the video wasn't interesting so far and the editing was horrible. Some people know when and how to make quick edits that add to the humor of their videos. For this guy, the abrupt edits only made him seem like more of a rambler. Did he actually say anything during the first minute other than that he was a Brit living in Los Angeles who was going to go to a gym? It just sounded like "blah blah blah" to me.

Just substitute Donald's name for Hillary's and the argument is still valid. Sadly, that's what our country has devolved into. Not only real people attacking each other versus arguing about ideas, but made-up-people attacking others based on personality, not ideas. Back to Roseanne, I have recorded but not watched it yet. Since it seems like a lot of people found it funny and it at least takes jabs all across the board, I am looking forward to watching it.

You can build it but we're not going to pay for it. If you want a wall, then you should pass your own laws that fine property owners when homeless people mix their trash, composting, and recyclables before the refuse collection company comes by, or when graffiti "artists" tag their buildings. Or maybe you can pass a tax on those evil "big soda" companies.

Exactly my point. Low mileage in porn doesn't mean he doesn't look haggard for his age. Chronic drug and/or alcohol use has an impact on one's appearance, even those who start out with genes that lend themselves to someone being good looking.

I wonder what the US travel map would look like if they rated areas inside the US the same as foreign destinations. I happen to live in San Francisco. A quick Google search revealed to me that San Francisco is only safer than 3% of American cities. In other words, I live in one of the most dangerous cities in the US. Maybe that colors my perception of Puerto Vallarta, but every time I've been there I have felt much more safe walking around than I do at home. And, if anything, the picture where I live just keeps getting worse, with the number of desperate, drugged out zombies camping all around my neighborhood exploding. I have had several coworkers assaulted during the late afternoon or early evening hours as they left work. And while this isn't in one of the nicest areas of San Francisco, it's definitely not among those that have been perceived as the worst. And even in perhaps the most gay of all US cities, I still encounter homophobia here on occasion. I have had anti-gay insults shouted at me from cars several times over my three decades here, and that was just with me walking down the street alone being myself, not doing anything that would call attention to myself as being gay. I'm not trying to argue that all of Mexico is safe. It certainly isn't. But to ignore that many places in the US are also places that a tourist might want to avoid due to crime is disingenuous. Just because our government doesn't want to warn people about areas within our own borders doesn't mean that we are safer at all places inside our country than we are traveling abroad. I've never tried to find similar data/warnings issued by other governments, but I wouldn't be surprised to find San Francisco on a "do not travel" list issued by some other nations. A German woman visiting with her husband for their anniversary was killed not far from Union Square, receiving a bullet that was intended for a gang member nearby. A British man was stabbed to death during a robbery. An Australian man was beaten to death during a street brawl. These are just the recent deaths that immediately come to my mind. The kind of crime that I have been a victim of in PV that I have rarely encountered in the US is vendors attempting to rip me off (exploiting my lack of fluency in Spanish and confusion with currency when I'm drunk) -- not returning the correct change, overcharging for something by an order of 10, etc.

Maybe not a lot of mileage in porn, but those mug shots reveal a man in his early 40s whose appearance suggests living a bit of a rough life. Hot body and the makings of a hot face for sure, but the mug shots reveal a personality I wouldn't want to encounter. Then again, I've never been turned on by the "bad boy" image.

I'm not an escort, but the obvious first response is to ask why you don't have a link to your ads in your profile here? I would have at least checked out your ad had I known how to. My second response is that it's okay to suggest to a client to submit a review, but I would stop at one simple request.

Such great advice. Why, that advice can be applied to all sorts of subject matter here. Count me among those who are baffled by all the negativity this guy has elicited. I know I cannot afford him, but I don't think poorly of him because of that. I think he's very cute, but I'm not entitled to be able to hire him.

It's funny. Lots of escorts seem to want to keep their listed age in their 30s forever. Perhaps they hope that there will be enough clients who simply don't care about the obvious fudging on age or clients who don't know any better, but as I have posted on other threads one of my immediate disqualifiers, even if I like someone's photos, is someone who claims to never age (or maybe increments his age one year every four or five years). I guess I'm chiming in just to point out that CutlerX isn't the only one with this issue, and there are both escorts and clients here who defend such escorts with the disclaimer, "He still looks hot." Yes, but a hot guy in his 50s does not look like a hot guy in his 30s.

That's supposed to be a male doll? From the waist up, it looks more like a young, relatively flat chested girl, not a male. Maybe that's the point if the doll is intended to appeal to guys who identify as straight. The doll has a penis but looks quite feminine.

It would defeat the purpose of the dish to pick up the chicken to eat it. If you do that, then you are just eating fried chicken with waffles and whatever else as a side dish. The idea is to eat the ingredients together, so a fork and knife are necessary.

I certainly haven't tried chicken and waffles everywhere they are available here, but I can attest to the deliciousness of them at Straw on Octavia in San Francisco. What sets them apart for me versus what I have had elsewhere: they are not just chicken, waffles, and syrup. They add some cheese, jam, and powdered sugar. It's over the top decadent but the flavors work so well together. Runner up for me is Miller's East Coast Deli simply because their fried chicken was better, but the rest of the dish wasn't up to Straw's standards.

Someone started a thread about him more than a year ago that didn't result in anyone reporting that they had hired him, just some enthusiasm for the ad. Seems like someone needs to "take one for the team" and report back. [url=https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/muscle-massage-in-sf.120141/][/url] https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/muscle-massage-in-sf.120141/

I hired him once about 5 years ago. The photos seemed dated, but probably his from many years ago. He definitely wasn't in the same physical shape and I was not attracted to him at all. I proceeded with the massage as a therapeutic massage, though, and it was okay but not exceptional.

Would anyone not already involved in Scientology be interested in watching the Scientology television network? If the critical and public reaction to the film Battlefield Earth is any indication, there might not be much of an audience.

1. It's always funny. 2. Sometimes it's emotionally moving. 3. LSFYL (Lipe Sync For Your Life/Legacy) 4. Watching creative people at their game (make up, costume design) 5. Learning drag queen vernacular. 6. The Pit Crew. Be still my beating heart, Jason Carter. Not to dismiss the other members of the Pit Crew, but Jason just floats my boat in every way. 7. And, of course, Ru Paul Charles.

Yes, everyone is entitled to his opinion. I just don't make it a habit to go into threads just to state I don't like something. But if that floats your boat, so be it.

It's my favorite TV show. It doesn't make anyone a "bad gay" for not liking it, but I question why anyone would go into a thread about a specific show only to state they don't like it unless one just likes being a provocateur.

Interesting story, but I don't know that I believe the guy who wrote it. Some of it sounds like quite a stretch, and it doesn't help that the uncensored version has photos of Ed Asner with his shirt off but then other similar looking men totally naked, perhaps in the hopes that people will assume those naked photos are of Ed Asner and taken by the guy who allegedly dated him.

Yes, Karl Kang is highly regarded around here. The fourth guy linked has also been mentioned in at least somewhat positive terms around here. I really like Billyrican's photos. One plus is that he updates his photos often, so unless he has a lot of old photos from around the same time he will look like his photos. I'm pretty sure he is actually in San Jose, though, not San Francisco. When he was first escorting I think he used to come up to SF on occasion and I regret not hiring him one of those times. It is puzzling, however, for someone who has been escorting and/or providing massage for so long that he has so little mention on this website.

Ricky Nelson remains one of the sexiest male pop singers ever. Dreamy eyes.

I agree. I don't need a meet and greet to determine interest. Also, when meeting if the guy isn't who he purports to be in his ad, I don't feel wrong in turning around and walking away without paying anything. Why should I hand over money to someone who places an obviously false ad? I'm not talking about a subtle difference like maybe he's a bit less toned than the photos in his ad, but if the photos aren't even of the same person or if they are obviously from more than a decade ago, I don't feel obligated to pay the guy for his time in preparing for an appointment that didn't happen. If anything, he should pay me for wasting my time since he is the cause of the failure to complete the agreement.

I'm sorry, but George Duroy's comments remind me of the bad "porn fantasy" background information that used to be published in magazines that flourished before home video took off. A despondent straight guy wanders into a gay porn company office because his girlfriend left him, surrenders his ass for all the other guys to plunder, and then realizes how much he loves taking it up the ass thus realizing he may not be 100% straight after all? I mean, come on.

I think this is the same guy whose ad first appeared within the past month or so as "ItalianMasseuse" or something like that. Someone asked about him then, acknowledging the error in this guy referring to himself using a feminine title, but I don't think anyone reported any feedback. Maybe no one has hired him because he keeps changing the name on his ad.

Seems like the gender change makes it more clearly straight, not gay. The singer says "all the boys dreamed they'd be your partner" because he's singing to someone he has been intimate with, so the lyric change suggests he's singing to a woman and not a man. Keeping "wife of a close friend" instead of singing "husband of a close friend" also makes sense since female-female sexual relations are okay with many straight dudes, but also because substituting a two syllable word for a one syllable word would sound clunky. I think I might like Chocolate Starfish's cover of "You're So Vain" if they had a different lead singer. The groove is nice, but I cannot say that this guy's voice is particularly pleasant or interesting.