José Soplanucas

I think he meant he found "no show" reviews on daddy's not that he found "no show" reviews for Kerry. I think "no show" reviews on daddy's are a fluke and not the norm. jbs submitted a "no show" review that probably won't be posted unless it is under some unexpected circumstance or Daddy has changed his policy

You can make little insinuations during sex, subtle things like "let me suck that (NAME OF COLLEGE) graduate's big dick", "you look so much better naked than in your mug shots", "Yeah, kiss me like you kissed you boyfriend in those Facebook pictures", "harder, harder like if you were pumping your credit report", etc

You can make little insinuations during sex, subtle things like "let me suck that (NAME OF COLLEGE) graduate's big dick", "you look so much better naked than in your mug shots", "Yeah, kiss me like you kissed you boyfriend in those Facebook pictures", "harder, harder like if you were pumping your credit report", etc

You can make little insinuations during sex, subtle things like "let me suck that (NAME OF COLLEGE) graduate's big dick", "you look so much better naked than in your mug shots", "Yeah, kiss me like you kissed you boyfriend in those Facebook pictures", "harder, harder like if you were pumping your credit report", etc

"Your parole officer is really cute. Have the two of you ever done it?"

You can make little insinuations during sex, subtle things like "let me suck that (NAME OF COLLEGE) graduate's big dick", "you look so much better naked than in your mug shots", "Yeah, kiss me like you kissed you boyfriend in those Facebook pictures", "harder, harder like if you were pumping your credit report", etc

You can make little insinuations during sex, subtle things like "let me suck that (NAME OF COLLEGE) graduate's big dick", "you look so much better naked than in your mug shots", "Yeah, kiss me like you kissed you boyfriend in those Facebook pictures", "harder, harder like if you were pumping your credit report", etc

You can make little insinuations during sex, subtle things like "let me suck that (NAME OF COLLEGE) graduate's big dick", "you look so much better naked than in your mug shots", "Yeah, kiss me like you kissed you boyfriend in those Facebook pictures", "harder, harder like if you were pumping your credit report", etc

+1
Most definitely during. Please make sure you're not too subtle though. You don't want him to miss the point. @latbear4blk gives great examples. I also think mentioning his wife or girlfriend by her name is an excellent idea. Nicknames are even better.

"Who's your daddy! Who's your daddy!"

You can make little insinuations during sex, subtle things like "let me suck that (NAME OF COLLEGE) graduate's big dick", "you look so much better naked than in your mug shots", "Yeah, kiss me like you kissed you boyfriend in those Facebook pictures", "harder, harder like if you were pumping your credit report", etc

You can make little insinuations during sex, subtle things like "let me suck that (NAME OF COLLEGE) graduate's big dick", "you look so much better naked than in your mug shots", "Yeah, kiss me like you kissed you boyfriend in those Facebook pictures", "harder, harder like if you were pumping your credit report", etc

You can make little insinuations during sex, subtle things like "let me suck that (NAME OF COLLEGE) graduate's big dick", "you look so much better naked than in your mug shots", "Yeah, kiss me like you kissed you boyfriend in those Facebook pictures", "harder, harder like if you were pumping your credit report", etc

You can make little insinuations during sex, subtle things like "let me suck that (NAME OF COLLEGE) graduate's big dick", "you look so much better naked than in your mug shots", "Yeah, kiss me like you kissed you boyfriend in those Facebook pictures", "harder, harder like if you were pumping your credit report", etc

You can make little insinuations during sex, subtle things like "let me suck that (NAME OF COLLEGE) graduate's big dick", "you look so much better naked than in your mug shots", "Yeah, kiss me like you kissed you boyfriend in those Facebook pictures", "harder, harder like if you were pumping your credit report", etc

@Johnsalako , please keep the reports coming. Of course we know you have better things to do and your hands are pretty busy with Dominican meat I am sure, but the people want to know!

Fascinating! And a little depressing.

Danny Cahill stood, slightly dazed, in a blizzard of confetti as the audience screamed and his family ran on stage. He had just won Season 8 of NBC’s reality television show "The Biggest Loser." When he got on the scale that evening, Dec. 8, 2009, he weighed just 191 pounds, down from 430. Dressed in a T-shirt and knee-length shorts, he was lean, athletic and as handsome as a model.
 
“I’ve got my life back,” he declared. “I mean, I feel like a million bucks.”
 
But in the years since, more than 100 pounds have crept back onto his 5-foot-11 frame despite his best efforts. In fact, most of that season’s 16 contestants have regained much if not all the weight they lost so arduously. Some are even heavier now.
 
Their experiences, while a bitter personal disappointment, have been a gift to science. A study of Season 8’s contestants has yielded surprising new discoveries about the physiology of obesity that help explain why so many people struggle unsuccessfully to keep off the weight they lose.
 
Dr. Kevin Hall, a scientist at a federal research center, had the idea to follow the “Biggest Loser” contestants for six years after that victorious night. The project was the first to measure what happened to people over as long as six years after they had lost large amounts of weight with intensive dieting and exercise.
 
The results, the researchers said, were stunning. They showed just how hard the body fights back against weight loss.
 
“It is frightening and amazing,” said Dr. Hall, an expert on metabolism at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, which is part of the National Institutes of Health. “I am just blown away.”
 
It has to do with resting metabolism, which determines how many calories a person burns when at rest. When the show began, the contestants, though hugely overweight, had normal metabolisms for their size, meaning they were burning a normal number of calories for people of their weight. When it ended, their metabolisms had slowed radically and their bodies were not burning enough calories to maintain their thinner sizes.
 
Researchers knew that just about anyone who deliberately loses weight — even if they start at a normal weight or even underweight — will have a slower metabolism when the diet ends. So they were not surprised to see that “The Biggest Loser” contestants had slow metabolisms when the show ended.
 
What shocked the researchers was what happened next: As the years went by and the numbers on the scale climbed, the contestants’ metabolisms did not recover. They became even slower, and the pounds kept piling on. It was as if their bodies were intensifying their effort to pull the contestants back to their original weight.
 
Mr. Cahill was one of the worst off. As he regained more than 100 pounds, his metabolism slowed so much that, just to maintain his current weight of 295 pounds, he now has to eat 800 calories a day less than a typical man his size. Anything more turns to fat.
 
...The experience [of the "Biggest Loser" contestants] shows that the body will fight back for years. And that, said Dr. Michael Schwartz, an obesity and diabetes researcher who is a professor of medicine at the University of Washington, is “new and important [information].”

... Dr. David Ludwig, the director of the New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center at Boston Children’s Hospital, who was not involved in the research, said the findings showed the need for new approaches to weight control. He cautioned that the study was limited by its small size and the lack of a control group of obese people who did not lose weight. But, he added, the findings made sense.
 
This is excerpted from a longer article; here's the link to the full text: http://www.msn.com/en-us/health/weightloss/after-%e2%80%98the-biggest-loser%e2%80%99-their-bodies-fought-to-regain-weight/ar-BBsvGHe?ocid=spartandhp

Lol. We always end in the same place. For most questions, there are as many answers as people involved. There is no standard in this industry. I guess we have to be open and perceptive to get to know the other as much as possible, and make a decision. It is not what we think we should do in an hypothetical situation, but what it is the best to do in specific circumstances.

Lol. We always end in the same place. For most questions, there are as many answers as people involved. There is no standard in this industry. I guess we have to be open and perceptive to get to know the other as much as possible, and make a decision. It is not what we think we should do in an hypothetical situation, but what it is the best to do in specific circumstances.

Information isn't necessarily aggregated as it is scattered. Google and other tools do the aggregation on the fly.
 
The most common links I find are:
 
Phone number:

The phone number may link to a directory giving name and address. Some of these directories managed to get ahold of the information provided to the cell provider when the phone was registered. Sometimes even a burn phone can carry some registration information. You aren't required to give a valid name in some instances. For example, when Rocco Steele first started escorting I was able to look up his real name and address by Googling his phone number from his first Rentboy ad. Now if I look up his current ad's phone number using a deeper directory search I only see this phone registered to "Rocco S".
Using the same phone number in business postings, or on personal posts or tweets, or classified ads can lead back to other personal information. An escort, for example, was selling a car on a social media group page. His phone number is in one of the responses, as is his real first name. He provided an address to an interested buyer. Even though his phone number itself didn't provide a search back to a directory with his name I was able to quickly turn up his first name and address. Searching on his address might turn up another piece of information. The car sale occurred years ago, but that information will still be available for quite some time.

 
Pictures:

Some guys use the same "G" pictures on escort ads and personal social media profiles. Google Image Search will quickly expose their identities in this case. Even if a guy crops his head off of a good body shot the image search may turn up the uncropped picture.

 
Profile names and email addresses:

If I used my Nvr2Thick handle as an email address that may also provide a link back to other social media posts where I provided an address. If I set up a gmail or yahoo address with that handle I may have provided my real first and last name when I registered. A search on that handle may pull up personal profile information, depending on how much the provider exposes and how well I've set my privacy settings.
If an escort provides an e-mail address it may provide another such link to relevant information if his handle on this site or on Rentmen is different.
If an escort is visiting Cleveland, for example, I might get on Adam4Adam or BarebackRT for Cleveland and stumble across (or aggressively search for) his escort and/or personal profiles. An escort may be advertising on one of those sites as Niner4Sale and cruising personally as HotBlkDaddy. A search on either of those handles may turn up a matching e-mail address or a profile with more personal information on another site.
Obviously it's not just escorts, but a lot of people have been using the same handles for decades now as an alter-ego or online identity. I hired my first escort in the mid-80's from an Advocate Classifieds ad. Quite a few years after he retired I found him in an AOL chat room. To this day his AOL handle is wired into his life. If I search that handle I find him on Facebook, Tumblr, all sorts of Craigslist ads, hundreds of personal pics on Photobucket...

It may seem complicated, but often when I find someone I'm looking for (escort or not) it often takes a few short hops. Here are a few fictionalized examples:
 


A Miami escort calling himself Hugo might have a good head and torso pic on his ad. I perform a Google Image Search and it turns up the same pic in a bodybuilding social media site profile for MaxBeastXMan. One of the comments under his progress pics says "Looking awesome buddy!" from a profile named "ArnoldWheatley". I look up Arnold Wheatley in Miami on Facebook, and scan his FB friends for a guy named Max, and I end up finding Max's personal profile and full name. That's probably five minutes of searching.
 
A phone number search on a supposedly 28 year old LA escort turns up the name Martin Ramirez. There are hundreds of matches on that name in California, but one of the first five hits from a Google search on "Martin Ramirez" "Los Angeles" pulls up a list of MyLife or White Pages directory profiles including a 32 year old Martin Ramirez, along with a list of possible family members. One of the family members is a 56 year old named Xiomara Ramirez. There are only a handful of people with that name on Facebook, and only two in California. One of those Xiomaras turns out to be his mom, and turns up the link to his profile. Five to ten minutes of simple mouse clicks.
 
A phone number search on an escort exposes a comment made on a post on someone's Tumblr. The owner of the Tumblr, ThickRickyPHX may or may not be important. The comment just says "Where u been Ricky - give me a call xxx-xxx-xxxx" from @MarcDaDJspins. A search on MarcDaDJspins turns up a crap ton of ads for Marc's performances as a DJ all over the Phoenix area, including his Instagram, his full name, his girlfriend's name... Ten minutes, maybe more if he's got some hot pictures on his Instagram.
 
Most of this doesn't require that you're "technically adept". When you Google something, you often just need to know which of the search results are worthwhile for the second Google search. The wordiness of my explanation may make this sound more technical than it actually is.

Really? Everyone googles everyone? You may be right, but I hope you are not. I have googled very few people, and it was always because of professional reasons, not to find personal stuff but to check professional achievements, as I am in a position where some times I participate in the hiring process in my job. I never googled an escort, and I have no interest in doing it. When I vet an escort I use this forum, and I may use google to check his pictures and look for reviews, but never looked for personal stuff. If my boys want to share, great, but I do respect their privacy.
To the OP, I would follow the advice of those who advocate for your silence.

@latbear4blk when I said everyone I meant not just in the escorting world. Why do bosses always want to befriend you on FB? I've seen people at the office snooping at each other instagrams and twitters and starting gossip where there's none. We can refrain from it, but to neglect that it's out there is kind of pointless. It doesn't matter if it's 100% or 50% or 10% of guys that do it, but it's being done. And I'm not talking about major investigating skills but a simple image search. We've also heard numerous times of escorts googling up client's phone numbers and addresses. I could say that it's wrong and not to do it, but I think it's more important to be aware that it can be done.
 
I've googled guys in the past, mostly new guys, to see if they're legit or real. It wasn't to find out about their personal life but if I did stumble upon it I would let them know. It happened twice with the guys I haven't hired and they were grateful. There was also a guy I saw a few times and then I stumbled upon one of his social media accounts. And I did let him know, too, and he was still willing to see me afterwards, although I knew there was a risk that he might not. This is just my perspective and what I have done in a similar situation to OP's. It doesn't mean that it's the right thing to do, but it is the option I chose in the past. And I do feel that if my photo was circulating out there with my personal information attached to it I would want to know.

Keep your mouth open but don't talk

I would keep it to yourself. What possible good can you foresee coming from revealing the information? Do you think it will impress him?
 
Tip #2. Don't drink to the point that you lose control.