ApexNomad

I’d let Jamie know—it may be something he might want to address.

Interesting profile. Not sure about the third bullet… LOL

Mama Rose is a role that traditionally demands a belter—a raw, powerhouse vocal approach. In my opinion, Audra’s voice is more head-driven, which makes me wonder how that will translate to such a force-of-nature character. That said, I trust her talent so I’m sure she’ll bring something unique to the role. If anything, I’m even more curious to see how her interpretation might reframe the character in ways I haven’t considered. The only role of hers that didn’t quite work for me was her portrayal of Lizzie Curry in 110 in the Shade. There’s something about Lizzie as a character that didn’t feel like the perfect fit for her. Lizzie is supposed to be plain and awkward, someone grappling with deep insecurities, and Audra’s natural elegance and sophistication made that a bit of a stretch. To her credit, she brought depth and power to the role, but I just didn’t find it entirely believable.

I stand corrected: The real thing is ALWAYS better… but most porn (except for Jamie’s) is also free.

I understand the distinction between recognizing someone’s looks and condoning their actions. But with a forum titled “Luigi Mangione Fetish,” it invites reflection on how much physical appearance influences our perceptions, if at all. Would this discussion even exist if he weren’t conventionally attractive? For some, I think the glorifying can be a slippery slope. Would the conversation be different if he were older, Black, Asian, Indian, or from any other background? It’s fascinating how appearance—always subjective—shapes the way we engage with and humanize people, often independent of their actions. This isn’t about judgment, but about considering the role appearance plays in shaping these conversations.

That goes without saying, but yes very true!! ❤️

I love you. LOL Wow! Thank you!

For first-time providers, I always put the cash in an envelope on a table or stand, and it’s always visible when they come in. They know it’s there, I know it’s there. I don’t hand it to them directly—call it a bit of caution on my part or stupidity. For regulars, I hand it over directly, still in an envelope, since there’s already trust established. Call me old-fashioned, but I don’t like handing over paper money right after our encounter. “Don’t treat them like a commodity, and don’t treat me like an ATM.” It’s a reminder to me to always maintain respect and dignity in this transaction, emphasizing that both parties should be valued beyond just the exchange of money.

The real thing is ALWAYS better… but porn is also free.

Not to veer off topic, but I think it varies and depends on each client and provider. For example, if I’m paying for a “boyfriend experience,” I want the full experience for what that means to me and how I articulate that to the provider. That means I expect the provider to engage with me on a level beyond just physical pleasure. If I specifically express that I want things like “Tell me you love me during sex,” then I want that to be part of the experience—I want whatever fantasy expressed for that encounter. If, on the other hand, I’m looking for a purely physical encounter with zero commentary, then I expect to skip the commentary and focus solely on the physical pleasure. The key is clear communication and setting boundaries that work for both parties. It’s important that both the client and provider feel comfortable with the arrangement, and that those boundaries are agreed upon upfront. If a provider is comfortable with my desires and we both agree on what the experience will be, then I think everyone gets what they want out of the encounter.

I give you an enormous amount of credit for getting back on the horse after repeated negative experiences, especially the one where you were drugged. Honestly, that would have ended this as my hobby entirely. I’m really sorry that happened to you, and I sincerely hope the end result wasn’t what we often fear in situations like that. I don’t know the details of what happened, and I’d be remiss to speculate. However, if any physical harm was done, I would consider seeking legal action. In situations like this, it’s often referred to as drink spiking or, in more severe cases, drug-facilitated assault. As for the statute of limitations, it varies by jurisdiction, but many places have a period ranging from a few years to several decades, especially for serious crimes like assault. It might be worth consulting with a legal professional to understand your options going forward. Your resilience is impressive, and I truly hope any future encounters are much more positive and fulfilling.

Is he a porn star?

It’s all strategic. Three potential reasons: 1. Leverage in Plea Negotiations: A terrorism charge significantly raises the stakes, potentially pressuring Mangione to accept a plea deal. 2. Public Perception: Labeling the act as terrorism emphasizes the severity of the crime and signals to the public that the State views the act as having broader societal implications, reinforcing their commitment to addressing such violence. 3. Unclear Motive or Evidence: The prosecution may have evidence that hasn’t been disclosed yet, which could tie Mangione’s actions to the statutory definitions of terrorism, such as attempting to influence government policy or intimidate a population.

I haven’t seen this production yet. Did you see this new production of Gypsy or is this your overall assessment of Ms. McDonald from other performances you’ve seen?

This case extends beyond the courtroom and touches on larger societal issues. While Mangione’s background positions him within the privileged elite, his supporters—many of whom come from marginalized communities—might view his actions differently. They could perceive his act not just as a crime, but as a challenge to the very systems of power they feel have long excluded them. In this light, Mangione may be seen as a martyr, with his supporters framing his actions as a form of resistance rather than a criminal act. This is reflected in the fundraising efforts for his defense, which seem to resonate with those who see Mangione as someone taking a stand against the status quo. The framing of his actions is likely to differ significantly depending on the social lens through which they are viewed. What’s fascinating, and concerning (especially for the prosecution I’d imagine), is that the legal and media narratives surrounding the case may do little to shift this perception among his supporters. In fact, they may only serve to deepen the divisions in the public’s understanding of justice, reinforcing the idea that the system is either working against or for certain segments of society, depending on one’s perspective.

The indictment on a terrorism charge significantly changes the dynamics of this case. It frames the defendant’s actions not just as a personal crime, but as an attack on society itself. The prosecution will likely focus on proving premeditation, showing the defendant’s actions were part of a larger, ideologically driven agenda. They’ll use any evidence of extremist beliefs, communications, or behavior to argue that the crime was motivated by more than personal grievances, thus justifying the terrorism charge. This also opens the door for harsher sentencing under terrorism statutes. For the defense, the challenge has now intensified. They’ll need to argue that the defendant’s actions, while tragic, were not ideologically motivated and do not meet the legal definition of terrorism. This could include bolstering arguments for diminished capacity, such as an insanity defense or extreme emotional disturbance, in an effort to show that the defendant was not in full control of his actions. They will also likely emphasize personal struggles or mental health issues to humanize the defendant and counter the terrorism charge. It’ll be interesting to see what plea the defense enters, as this will significantly shape the trial strategy. In high-profile cases like this one, where the charges are severe (e.g., terrorism and murder), the decision for a jury trial is more likely, especially given the emotional weight of the charges. However, the defendant may still request a bench trial, depending on their strategy and legal counsel’s advice.

That’s a beautiful story. It speaks to the care, respect, and commitment both of you have towards each other. That’s really special.

To me, there are red flags. Why start a profile based in DC but claim you’re just visiting? Your lead photo is of your face covered—fine, you don’t have to show your face, then at least show your body. And the ad copy is odd: “Whether it’s a night under the city lights or an intimate evening in, I am your guide to indulgence.” Really? If you’re just visiting, I probably know more about the city than you do. My guess is you’ll find someone different than the person advertised. But a video call should do the trick to clear up any confusion.

Nothing kills the vibe faster than treating an escort like a cashier. If you really want to make the experience feel even more transactional, asking for change will do it. Just consider it a tip—they’ll appreciate it, and trust me, they’ll remember you if you decide to hire them again.

Surface: If you love mysteries that keep you guessing, Surface is for you. It’s a sleek psychological thriller that dives into themes of identity, memory, and trust. You’re constantly questioning what’s real and who’s lying, which makes it completely binge-worthy. Great, understated performances. Ted Lasso: If you haven’t watched Ted Lasso yet, you’re missing out on one of the most heartwarming, feel-good shows ever. It’s funny, uplifting, and surprisingly deep. Silo: Silo is one of the best new sci-fi shows out there—it’s a slow-burn mystery that’s both thought-provoking and thrilling. Set in a massive underground silo where society’s been living for generations, the story follows people questioning why they’re there and what’s really outside. The production design is stunning, the performances (led by the amazing Rebecca Ferguson) are incredible, and every episode leaves you wanting more. If you love shows like The Expanse or Westworld, you’ll be obsessed with this.

Would you mind expanding on this, I’m not sure I quite follow.

Eric Hassan https://rent.men/thedudenextdoor

I completely agree! (Everyone should listen to you - that’s perfect advice!!) I myself have never done the video clip with the provider. For first-time providers, I’ve only ever described what I’m into and looking for, confirmed the must-haves from their profile that are important to me to make sure we’re on the same page, and then I really just give myself (literally LOL) to the provider and to the moment. Not to sound corny, but I’m trusting myself in their hands. That’s why I’m there!

You could certainly try, but to your point about bad links, phishing, etc., that might raise a red flag for the provider. They might also think you’re a time-waster, especially if you’ve never hired them before. You’re better off describing the scene in your own words or showing the clip in person once you’ve hired them and built some chemistry. This way, it feels like part of foreplay and helps set the tone, making it a more natural and enjoyable experience for both of you.