JamesB

Also here for cross reference. https://rentmasseur.com/Jaircolombian

If your only goal is to read the reviews, you can simply use Chrome with the free VPNLY extension, which should give you access without much hassle.

US real GDP is projected around 2.0-2.2% for 2026. Not booming but positive and stable. Forecasters like CBO, Deloitte, Conference Board see modest expansion, supported by AI investment and consumer spending. Unemployment is hovering at 4.3 - 4.4%. Low-hire/low-fire environment. Not surging toward Depression-era levels. Markets price around 21% by end of 2026. Some downside risks exist (tariffs, policy uncertainty, cooling labor), but consensus sees no imminent collapse. A Great Depression requires cascading bank failures, 20-30% GDP drop and mass unemployment. Nothing in the data supports that trajectory.

High risk of AI/tech correction and market volatility? Reasonable. Broad economic catastrophe on par with 1929-1933? No. The music might slow, but the economy has real supports that dot-com era lacked. Stay diversified, skeptical of extremes on both sides.

Also here for cross reference. https://rentmasseur.com/ValentinoAura https://www.masseurfinder.com/massage-therapists/52536/

Also here for cross reference. https://rentmasseur.com/ValentinoAura https://www.masseurfinder.com/massage-therapists/52536/

Actually, on RMen, providers can set separate rates for incall, outcall and overnight services, but those details are only visible in certain countries, and the U.S. is not one of them.

I would say yes, at least in the short term. While setbacks like this are both common and expected in a field as complex as spaceflight, they serve as a reminder of just how difficult reliable access to orbit remains, even for well-funded organizations. SpaceX has certainly had its own share of spectacular test failures over the years but the timing of this setback is significant. For the foreseeable future, it further reinforces SpaceX’s position as the dominant U.S. launch provider and leaves the government with fewer viable alternatives for critical orbital missions.

Bitdefender

I contacted him several weeks ago and the whole interaction immediately felt really odd. First, he sent me a mile long text about his services and rates, but it was poorly written, overly vague, and somehow managed to answer almost nothing. Then the questions started getting strange. Even though I was asking for an incall, he wanted to know where I lived, then where I was from and what I did for a living. None of it really made sense in context and the conversation just felt off overall. My gut was telling me something wasn’t right, so I simply thanked him for his time and ended the conversation.

I usually send them a card or text wishing them a happy birthday along with a small gift. If I’m able to see them around their birthday, I’ll usually buy them something in person. Otherwise, I’ll just send a little money through Zelle.

I only have a few followers and honestly, most of them are people I’ve never directly interacted with. It doesn’t bother me at all. I just see it as part of how online platforms work. Sometimes people follow out of curiosity, shared interests or simply because they’ve come across your posts over time.To me, it feels more like people casually keeping up with profiles or conversations they find interesting rather than anything weird or intrusive.

I’ve had some issues over the past few weeks while using 1.1.1.1 WARP by Cloudflare, but only on my Chromebook. Switching over to my personal VPN solved the problem for me.

Name change https://rent.men/Billy_PR

https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/162281-which-position-is-your-dick-in-when-lying-on-the-table

Name change https://rent.men/FunwithBilly

I think the client got cold feet and canceled, something I would expect that often happens with first-time hirers. I prefer to keep things efficient with fewer messages. My initial message states my interest and asks about availability, location, and rates. If that looks good, I direct them to my complete profile and ask if they’re comfortable with it. A positive response closes the deal quickly.

Not anymore. They no longer accept cryptocurrency.

https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/160784-411-on-angelsbigxl-in-fl

I’ve been dealing with the same thing lately. So far this year, one provider showed up late to two different sessions, 20 minutes late the first time and 40 minutes late the second. Needless to say, there won’t be a third appointment. Another provider confirmed a mid-afternoon session that same morning, only to cancel two hours before. Then there was another who kept changing the meeting time throughout the day until I finally got tired of the back and forth and canceled altogether.

The decline did indeed hit its stride in the 1920s but it wasn't because we were following a European trend. In fact, it was largely due to three American innovations: 1.- The Electric Starter (1912). Before this, gas cars required a dangerous hand-crank to start. 2.- The Assembly Line. Henry Ford’s Model T made gasoline cars significantly cheaper than their electric counterparts. By 1912, an electric roadster cost $1,750, while a gasoline car cost only $650. 3.- The U.S. Highway System. As Americans wanted to travel between cities, the limited range of electric batteries and the lack of rural electricity made gasoline the only viable option.

While there are certainly legitimate reasons for a provider to run late, in my experience most delays tend to come down to poor planning or time management. For me, it depends on the situation. If it’s our first time meeting and they let me know before the appointment that they’ll be up to 30 minutes late, I usually don’t mind waiting. Things happen. But if there’s a second delay or the timing keeps shifting, I’m out and the meeting is canceled. On the other hand, if it’s someone I’ve hired before and they’ve consistently been punctual, I’m much more flexible, provided they communicate ahead of time and it still works with my schedule.

From what I understand, the client didn’t request a second provider and made it clear he wasn’t in a position to pay for one, so that situation really falls on the first provider. That said, on the few occasions when I’ve arranged sessions involving more than one provider, I’ve always relied on the provider I already knew and trusted to coordinate with any additional participants. I’m not saying that’s the standard approach but in my limited experience it has worked out well

I always take those “into” lists with a grain of salt. Like I’ve mentioned in other threads, it’s always best to confirm directly with the provider about anything that’s important to you.

Pictures point to an X account of a OF model by the name of Paul Gainz.