JamesB

When installing older printers, compatibility issues are pretty common. Are you setting it up on a Mac or Windows system?

Using a VPN I can see the phone numbers just fine.

I’m currently outside the U.S., and all the sites display normally. The only one behaving oddly is MF. For the past several months, if I’m not in the U.S., it won’t display providers’ phone numbers.

A quick search will reveal that the opposite is true. Cologne and fragrance usage are currently experiencing a significant renaissance. Far from declining, the global men’s fragrance market is projected to reach over $12.4 billion in 2026, with a consistent growth rate of about 5% annually, outpacing women's in some areas.

I guess I’m the odd duck in this pond. For me, it’s automatic, I get out of the shower, put on deodorant, and a bit of cologne. If a date specifically asks me not to wear deodorant, I’m fine with that. When I’m hiring, wearing deodorant and cologne is what makes me feel most comfortable, so that’s how I show up. For what it’s worth, I’ve also asked a couple of providers to take a quick shower before we start playing.

Name change: https://rent.men/UrRicanBoyToy

Interesting that his hair looks exactly the same in every photo.

Oh, wait, I think I misread your original post. If you didn’t use PayPal to pay him, just block him and move on. And who cares if you’re in his doorbell video? If people could collect money from anyone caught on a doorbell camera, we’d all be rich.

Honestly, it does sound a bit like a scam, but banking errors happen more often than people realize. Start by checking your bank or credit card statements and look closely at the date of service. Was the $815 actually debited? Also check for automatic chargebacks. Sometimes banks flag large or unusual transactions as potential fraud and reverse them without the cardholder explicitly requesting it. Log directly into your PayPal account, do not click any links from texts or emails. Check the Resolution Center for any open disputes or chargebacks. If everything checks out on your end, keep records of all communications and transactions, and then block him.

It sounds like you are thinking of the blog Dancing with the Devil in the City of Angels. The author used the pseudonym "The Devil," was a well-known figure in the mid-2000s Thailand expat blogging scene. You can probably read captured snapshots using the Way Back Machine. https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://bangkokbois-gay-thailand-blog.com/. If this isn't the one, it might be an older blog from platforms like Blogspot or LiveJournal that's no longer indexed well. Try broader searches on the Wayback Machine or gay Thailand forums like Sawatdee Network (sawatdeenetwork.com) for mentions or backups.

May I suggest that next time you post something like this in a public forum, you black out the amounts.

Assets Typically Subject to Step-Up in Basis: Real Estate: Homes, land, rental properties or other real property owned individually or jointly Stocks and Bonds: Individual stocks, bonds or similar securities held in taxable brokerage accounts. Mutual Funds and ETFs: Funds and exchange traded funds in taxable accounts. Collectibles and Tangible Property like art, antiques, coins, precious metals, furnishings or other personal property. Business Interests: Ownership in partnerships, LLCs, sole proprietorships or other business entities. Assets held in revocable trusts or jointly owned (with rights of survivorship) often qualify, as they are typically included in the estate. Bank accounts, cash, or similar non-appreciating assets are at face value and don't require a step-up, but they are passed without capital gains implications. Assets Typically NOT Subject to Step-Up in Basis Retirement Accounts: Traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs, 401(k)s, 403(b)s, 457 plans or pensions. Annuities: Tax-deferred annuities (gains are taxed as ordinary income). Assets in Irrevocable Trusts: Those not included in the decedent's estate (e.g., irrevocable grantor trusts) generally do not qualify. Gifted Assets: Property gifted during the owner's lifetime (prior to death) carries over the original basis, without step-up.

This is my response from a different post on a closely related subject. https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/166588-are-subsequent-sessions-different/#findComment-2565276

How about adding the cruise details to your ad description?

First of all, if he hasn’t asked for it upfront, don’t feel pressured to offer it. Even when you trust a provider, it’s worth remembering that money has a way of changing behavior. Paying 100% upfront introduces several practical risks. If something happens on his end after the cash has changed hands, illness, a family emergency, or another issue, you have no real leverage to secure a refund or even a reschedule. Also, while most professionals remain professional, full prepayment can sometimes shift the power dynamic or weaken the incentive structure of the arrangement. There’s also risk on your side. If your plans change or an emergency prevents you from going, recovering a large cash amount from an individual can be extremely difficult. While it is legal to fly domestically with any amount of cash, large sums can attract attention. If TSA encounters a significant amount of cash during a search, they may refer the matter to law enforcement. You could then be asked to demonstrate that the funds are legitimate, which can quickly turn into a major headache and even cause you to miss your flight. There are safer alternatives. One option is to ask whether he would accept a cashier’s check or certified bank check. It’s safer to carry, widely accepted, and can be canceled if lost. Another option is to offer a partial amount, for example $3,000 to $5,000, a few days in advance as a good-faith security deposit, with the balance paid upon arrival.

I’ve become much more selective over time. I used to jump into bed with anything that had a pulse, but these days, especially when hiring, I’m far more discerning. I know what I want, how I want it, and when and I’m no longer willing to tolerate nonsense. The moment things don’t align with my expectations, I move on. Also at this point, my tolerance for drama is zero.

The OP is talking about a domestic destination.

Another new RMen profile, same old pics: https://rent.men/UrRicanKing

First, you need to decide what “safe” and “worth it” mean to you. If you’re not comfortable giving your credit card information to RM, you can always pay with crypto. As for whether it’s worth it, only you can answer that for yourself. The main advantages are access to private galleries and in my experience, providers tend to take premium members a bit more seriously.

Just like with any other “intos” that are important to me, I always ask them to confirm they’re okay with it. With Latin providers, I make a point of confirming in Spanish so there’s no room for the usual “no hablo” excuse.

I met Joao two, maybe three years ago. At the time he was based in Orlando, though I don’t believe that’s still the case. He’s a super nice guy from Brazil, and his English is very good. His photos are accurate, and he gives a decent massage, though as FLJock mentioned, it’s on the shorter side. MT and HE are included, and the extras are very good. If the massage itself is a priority for you, he may not be the best fit. But if you’re looking for a brief, solid massage followed by play, I can recommend him.

This is the one I use. Works like a charm. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09321LDK8?th=1

Are you sure the urge to disclose isn’t coming from a less flattering place? He wronged you by taking your money, and even if it’s unconscious, there’s a real risk that this disclosure is about moral positioning, controlling the narrative, or preemptively absolving yourself. Ask yourself this: if no money had changed hands, would the same urgency still be there? If the answer is no, then this isn’t really about transparency. It’s about discomfort with unresolved moral business. Just make sure you’re not telling yourself a cleaner story than the one that’s actually driving the impulse.

Why? I really fail to see any upside to this.