KinkyNEguy

AI is full of promise in solving real issues that can improve people's everyday lives. 
It is even more promising in obscuring truth, getting consumers to part with money, and creating disruption in people's faith in all systems of government, so they can be more readily privatized. 
Skepticism of AI is warranted, in spite of the endless entertainment value currently enjoyed on phones and tablets. 

If you have tried to contact him and he has ignored you, it may be time to store those memories in a file:  good times long gone and not to return.  If you have an address, write him a letter.  Tell him that you still think of your friendship fondly and that you wish him well.   Tell him you are open to talking or texting or even seeing one another if you are ever physically close enough for that to happen.  Then, close that book.  If he contacts you that would be nice but ultimately not likely to restore any old bonds.  If he does not contact you, then you need to respect his choice, no matter how unfinished the business between you is in your mind.  

What was the line in the movie that brought all this up?

I think it's the unrealistically high price that caused some to respond with snark.  Sure, it isn't the nicest thing in the world to do but I would hope that anyone who believes he has the goods to be a provider understands that not everyone is going to find him appealing.  Having some men write that he's not appealing to them shouldn't be so hard to take when others find him the bee's knees.  

I understand what would actually happen, my whole point is that part of the providers job is customer relations and some put in zero effort. If they are going to treat me the same as a client vs some stranger at the bar then I'll go find someone else to give my money to.

Thank you.   Have a great day 

To be clear - you mirrored his logic and i acknowledged that.  But your mirroring was very narrow.   But you did not mirror his logic when you changed his meaning from a client offer to a provider ask. A point you seem to be deflecting from.  But I don’t care - I stand by my first response that had nothing to do with you but rather the comment you were “mirroring”
I’m sure you reap what you sow and that fact is no skin off my scrotum. 

I mirrored the logic. If that’s suddenly a problem, that says more about the logic than my reply.
Not sure why that’s hitting a nerve for you. If you like his suggestion, feel free to take him up on it. He explicitly mentioned money. Go back and read it.

Maybe, but restating his words to suit your meaning is.   

This is a discussion forum. I engaged with the comment and had an exchange with the provider. That’s not pouncing, that’s the point of being here.
Disagreement isn’t hostility, even if you want to frame it that way. If the discussion isn’t for you, you’re free to skip it.

As I said - YOU MADE YOUR POINT!
But you also made mine.
 
If you’re going to be pedantic, no one said anything about ASKING for extra money - except - you.   He was simply making a suggestion that you seem to feel a need to pounce on him about. Ok, you don’t like the suggestion.  We get it.  

Getting head makes me very relaxed. You could offer something like that for me free, just to be “nice” right? You don’t need to do it every week/month. How about Thursdays?

The provider in question is literally suggesting clients give money with no expectation in return and calling that “care.” That’s not addressing a power imbalance, it’s financial manipulation. 
The “false equivalence” argument doesn’t hold. Not clock-watching or being extremely attentive is great service, and yes should be rewarded if the client has the means beyond the terms that the provider has already established, but it’s still within the structure of the arrangement set again by the provider. That’s not the same as asking for extra money outside of it because it’s nice and to be cared for. 
And the “power imbalance” point isn’t universal. Not every client is loaded or in a position of strength. Some save up just to afford an hour or two, some are physically vulnerable. There are imbalances on both sides.
This reads like one side is expected to give more with no return, while the other side’s “care” stays within the deal. That’s the very definition of imbalance.

Well, at that point, I think you knew what you were signing up for. You gave it a solid run and got out. Better late than never. 

So by that logic, you’d be open to seeing a client for free sometimes, just because it’s nice and makes them feel cared for?

This happened to me last year.
Met a fantastic provider, and told him my expectations. He was delivering those expectations... until he started slipping. We would meet for 2-3 hours usually and would have overnights once a month or every other month. After about 5 months he just... started doing the bare minimum. He didn't cum anymore (on 2-3 hour meets AND overnights). I told him that I expected it, he said that was the goal but sometimes he couldn't which I understood once, or twice but after 4-5 meets and him not delivering, I told him that I appreciated our time together but if he wasn't able to cum I understood but it wasn't going to work for me.
I told him if anything were to change on his side to let me know but I wasn't going to book again. He understood but don't think he took it well.
You stop booking, that's what you do. You tell them you expect X. If they don't deliver X then you don't book again.

Just so I understand correctly, your suggestion is to invest more in that provider whenever he fails to meet customer's original expectation notwithstanding he has received compensation for that very original expectation. So in short: pay for original quote; then pay more if provider fails to perform and anyhow tips if provider exceeds expectation. BUT all that said, its not at all about money just a way to spoil provider without expecting any return. So is it charity or investment?

Curious if anyone has met? 
HairyAngelo - Male Escort, Gay massage - New York City | Rent.Men
RENT.MEN HairyAngelo Gay Escort in New York City, New York, available for Gay Escorting,Modeling,Bodywork. | Find...  

Biggest hands on RM

He is a very popular guy on twitter and only fans. I think he probably gets a lot of messages and only a few are actual clients as opposed to time wasters. 
I do agree he would do better to just block and move on instead of sending nasty comments but he probably thinks 'they will never be my client anyway'. 
I didn't find his rates to be out of the ordinary for NYC.  I have seen him a few times now. 
I wouldn't advise to reach out unless you are a serious client. doesn't sound like he does well with people just fishing for info. 
people say this all the time about the providers - but he really is more handsome than his pics. I don't know why he has chosen those pics for his profile. I doubt people would say anything bad if they actually met him.  

Actually, it’s pretty easy to respond to without turning people off or coming across too defensive.  I’ve seen quite a few providers do it well, usually the ones that are being honest and providing good service.  I thought Jacob’s last response was closer, but if you need help, see how any good business responds to the occasional disgruntled customer (or sometimes jealous competition masquerading as one).
“Hey guys, just wanted to put out there that I actually don’t use meth.  I put PNP, because I allow my clients to use.  Sorry for the confusion, but I’ll clarify what I mean in my profile.
To the poster, I’m sorry I didn’t provide you with the experience you were looking for, I do try to provide the best for anyone willing to take the time, energy, and resources to book me, but I’m not perfect.  If there was some specific feedback you had to help me improve, please message me, I’m always open to it!  I do sometimes pass on dates that I don’t feel comfortable with, only because I know neither of us would be happy with that experience.  Please don’t take it personally if this was the case, I meant no disrespect by declining your generous offer.
Just wanted to make sure you guys didn’t think I was a meth addict.  Have a great day!”
 
see.  Easy.  Hopefully Jacob meant what he said about trying to learn how to deal with this type of situation.  If so, I applaud him for actually trying to learn rather than smear.  FYI, the kind of provider that had the above response is one I would hire, as it flags professionalism and signals that clients are safe with them (they aren’t crazy or likely to try to use some of the tactics that some providers use to silence bad reviews, such as a smear campaign or extortion/blackmail.

I think it’s funny that you think he’s not here……

Honey…..you let a whore into the room with the expensive antique chairs?
Your mother taught you better than that.
"Antiques are for the husbands. IKEA is for the whores."
This one’s on you. 

I see where you're coming from, but would you be okay with contributing financially to someone with so much hatefulness?  Only speaking for myself, but I wouldn't be able to hire any professional if I knew they promoted such ignorance and hate.  No lawyer, no accountant, no healthcare provider - I would rather distance myself from anyone with those attitudes, rather than support them - no matter how good they might be at their job.   

Definitely live and let live, and I trust you know my reply wasn't meant as a judgement in any way.  I have likely hired all sorts of people, from gardeners to car mechanics, and musicians to accountants, who might very well have views that I would find offensive or even dangerous.  But I haven't knowingly done so - if any of them were public about their views, I would have chosen someone else.  And if I found out after the fact, I would choose someone else the next time.  I don't screen or do any deep dives on people, but if something was made known to me and I could confirm it, that would be something I would have to consider in making decisions.  But that's just how I approach it, and I don't expect everyone to see it the way I do.