Jump to content

Banned Words


Cooper
This topic is 4182 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Once a year the Lake Superior State University in Michigan comes out with their top 12 list of banned words. Here's this year's nominees.

 

— fiscal cliff

 

— kick the can down the road

 

— double down

 

— job creators/creation

 

— passion/passionate

 

— YOLO

 

— spoiler alert

 

— bucket list

 

— trending

 

— superfood

 

— boneless wings

 

Have any others you would like to add to this list?

 

Coop:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could it depend upon the context and frequency of use for those words/phrases? Used sparingly most any word that accurately means what you intended is perhaps not so trite?

 

Nice point. The other day I read some advice about writing (can't recall who): "Never use a word more than once on the same page."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice point. The other day I read some advice about writing (can't recall who): "Never use a word more than once on the same page."

 

Presumably meaning a printed page, eh? A web page can hold a whole lot more words.

 

The web and e-readers are wreaking havoc on academia because pagination (and therefore many bibliographic references) goes out the window in most electronic forms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd add just about any noun that has been verbed.

 

Recently, I saw live coverage of a high speed freeway chase on an LA TV station when the announcer said "we are efforting to get more information".

 

Efforting? How about trying? Or attempting? You know, real words that already exist and mean what you're trying to say.

 

During coverage of a later chase (yeah, we have a lot of 'em), the helicopter reporter described a PITT maneuver as "well efforted". Argh! It's multiplying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

incentivize, or its bastard child, incent. It's motivate, dammit!

 

Kevin Slater

 

YES!..."incentivize" is the one word I started hearing just a few months ago that has bugged me the most lately....another noun that has been turned into a verb....oh, man....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

incentivize, or its bastard child, incent. It's motivate, dammit!

 

The Economist's 'Johnson' columnist had similar thoughts...

 

Neologisms

Incent

 

Jun 28th 2011, 14:27 by R.L.G. | NEW YORK

 

THIS morning I heard a corporate-governance expert ask "what do compensation policies incent managers to do?" It wasn't a fluke; a little later she used incent again. The meaning is clear enough: to give someone an incentive. But where did it come from, and do we like it?

 

The Oxford English Dictionary answers the first clearly enough: incent is "apparently a back formation". A back-formation is one of those words invented because they seem to have been at the root of a different word. "Pease" was once the mass noun for a bowlful of little round things that you eat. Many English-speakers over time thought this was a plural count noun, though, and so pea is a back-formation. Many enter the language as successful words. Resurrect is also a back-formation, from resurrection.

 

The OED's first citation for incent is 1977, for those tempted to bemoan modern management speak; incent is almost as old as this blogger. Awkwardly, though, incent has a rival, incentivise. Incentivise is probably older (the first citation is from 1968). Many traditionalists don't like adding -ize or -ise willy-nilly to nouns to make them verbs, but these same types don't like back-formations either. Moreover, these are often the same people (like Strunk & White, or the editor of The Economist's style book) who tell you to omit needless words wherever possible. "To give someone an incentive" is longer than "to incentivize" and "to incent", and "incent" has the virtue of being a bit shorter.

 

All told, incentivise isn't going to be tripping off my tongue too often, but it's more legitimate to me than incent, and its brevity speaks in its favour. But we try to incent commenters to jump in here with little tag-questions at the end of a post, so what do you think? Incent, incentivise or to give an incentive?

 

http://www.economist.com/blogs/johnson/2011/06/neologisms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd add just about any noun that has been verbed.

 

Tabled? Wheeled? Cupped? Mouthed? Dicked? Fingered? Closeted? Corseted? Balled? Roped? Clamped? Chained?

 

...The language cupboard might look pretty bare if stripped of verbed nouns.

 

Thinnin' on the above list, it does seem to help if the noun was Anglo-Saxon. Agree that verbing of Latinate nouns ought be punishable by roping, clamping and/or chaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if AMAZING has been mentioned yet, but if I never hear it again I shall be fine.

Last year I posted ACTUALLY when a similar thread was begun; I'll plead again that everyone stop using it.

In answer to a question, beginning a response with WELL.

And finally SO LAST YEAR......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...