Help needed with New Pictures.

[Juan Vancouver]

Hi everyone!

 

I am in a bit of a conundrum: I got some pics a couple days ago and when I reviewed them today trying to choose which ones I was going to upload to my ad, I realized that some of them were a little too similar. Since the number of pictures that one can upload into an ad is somewhat limited (at least on rent boy) I would like your opinion about them.

 

Is it overkill to upload the four of them, even if they are somewhat similar?

 

If it is too much, which ones should I upload and why?

 

Any input will be much appreciated.

 

Picture 1

http://ecs1.gaydar.net/newphotos/78/24/7885024_626836.jpg

 

Picture 2

http://ecs2.gaydar.net/newphotos/78/24/7885024_327785.jpg

 

Picture 3

http://ecs3.gaydar.net/newphotos/78/24/7885024_716746.jpg

 

Picture 4

http://ecs3.gaydar.net/newphotos/78/24/7885024_158434.jpg

[raulgmanzo]

Hi everyone!

...

Is it overkill to upload the four of them, even if they are somewhat similar?

If it is too much, which ones should I upload and why?

 

 

They are all hot and fun and my favorite is #1.

While your face is partly obscured it is obvious that you are a very good looking man.

Your handsome ear draws my gaze to your great nose, and lips which are nicely framed by your big arms.

In this photo the chain on your neck has an mysterious ambiguity, we don't see the front of the chain, how it lays and what it might have attached to it.

Lastly, well the first or second thing I noticed, is the nice large package. It looks like it is about to get even a lot larger. Probably will no longer be able to contain it in your jock.

Turns me on, piques my curiousity and whets my appetite!

 

Picture 1

http://ecs1.gaydar.net/newphotos/78/24/7885024_626836.jpg

[bigvalboy]

I agree with Raul, I liked #1 because you can see part of your face...and the frontal shot shows a nice package, 'Very Hot' and I liked the last one, great shot from the rear, and your back, ass and legs look spectacular. I would probably not upload all of them, as you are right, as a set they seem too similar. Looks like you Canadian boys are having some great fun up there....

[jgoo]

They are all very good but I personally like no. 1 and no. 4 the best. But where is no. 5 of full frontal nude? :-) Seriously, all are hot.

[jawjateck]

I would agree that perhaps you should hold back from posting all of them at once. Plus, it gives you flexibility to keep your ad fresh by swapping the pics a month or so later. If others are like me, clients love ads that are regularly updated with fresh pics; it definitely keeps us engaged on the target of our desires.

 

As for me, I love 3 and 4. I'm a chest man, and 3 lets me see the pecs, and I'm a butt/legs man, and 4 takes care of that too. By the way, your butt looks delicious.

[healthguy]

All are excellent, and all at least a #10. However, #1 get a 10+. For very much the same reasons Raul mentioned. Mystery, with just the right amount of teasing! I like Rauls remark about, "handsome ear."

[maxwellissmart]

Hi everyone!

 

I am in a bit of a conundrum: I got some pics a couple days ago and when I reviewed them today trying to choose which ones I was going to upload to my ad, I realized that some of them were a little too similar. Since the number of pictures that one can upload into an ad is somewhat limited (at least on rent boy) I would like your opinion about them.

 

Is it overkill to upload the four of them, even if they are somewhat similar?

 

If it is too much, which ones should I upload and why?

 

Any input will be much appreciated.

 

Picture 1

http://ecs1.gaydar.net/newphotos/78/24/7885024_626836.jpg

 

Picture 2

http://ecs2.gaydar.net/newphotos/78/24/7885024_327785.jpg

 

Picture 3

http://ecs3.gaydar.net/newphotos/78/24/7885024_716746.jpg

 

Picture 4

http://ecs3.gaydar.net/newphotos/78/24/7885024_158434.jpg

 

1 and 4 are good—2 looks like you're trying to ward off a blow and 3 looks like you stepped on a nail. What's funny is that even with that dramatic posing, I recognized immediately that it was you, Arnold Kimpleschmitz—all the way from Grundy Center, Iowa!

 

Looking good Arnold—I mean, Juan.

[Michael Wayne]

all are good . #1 is great. I think were I in the market for a bottom your ass shots are to die for and if I was lookng for a top the bulge in your jock would make my knees tremble. I am glad to see a guy actually think about his pics. I think sometimes we just snap one and post it without really thinking about it.

[RockHard]

Everyone has an opinion but few know what they are talkin about.

 

#4 is my least favorite because it lacks energy. The remote trigger control in your right hand is distracting.

 

The crop of the foot in #3 is a tad amputee. Some people are into that. Don't like the lighting hot-spots on your chest and torso. A different light source would have come in handy here.

 

#2 is OK but it looks like you're very intent on not showing any part of your face, which never sends a good message, IMO.

 

#1 seems to hit all the right chords, except I would change the graphics. There's room for a great font/name-logo but the font design you selected does nothing for me.

 

Some escorts post almost every image from a shoot, which, IMO, is a disaster. Even though the lighting is basically the same in all 4, the poses are completely different as well as the body language. So, similar? Yes, but not really.

 

The similar that annoys me (and marks someone as not having a clue) is the escort who can't edit. Most fall into this category.

 

Good luck.

[+ Charlie]

Yes, they are all too similar to post in the same ad, and even before reading the other comments I felt that #1 was the best.

[EZEtoGRU]

As others have said, #1 and #4 are my favorites.

[seeker630]

I'd go with #1 & # 4 - in 2 & 3, it looks like the pose is about hiding your face (and in #2, it looks like you're in the process of turning AWAY from the viewer/client. )

[Racketjock]

I like #1, but would prefer it with the jock removed.

[EZEtoGRU]

Looks like Juan added 1 & 2 to his RB ad. He may have the others in the private area of the ad....I didn't check that.

[Juan Vancouver]

What's funny is that even with that dramatic posing, I recognized immediately that it was you, Arnold Kimpleschmitz—all the way from Grundy Center, Iowa!

 

Looking good Arnold—I mean, Juan.

 

Oy Vey! Finally this meshugas of trying to hide my punim and identity has come to an end! I am so verklempt that I have spilkes in my genektikezoyt! A shaynem dank, Max, Thank you very much! All this work to revert my own briz will pay chai kock in the end! Go ahead, call me Arnie from now on.

 

 

As for watermarking the images, I have to confess that I am not terribly worried about anyone stealing them. It has happened in the past, and can't say it won't happen again. I just think that the images we can post in most sites have to be so small that all the quality and detail is lost, to add on top of that the distracting font over the body. Thank you for offer to help, though, Anton.

 

To all the rest of you, thank you very much for your input. I really appreciate it and will consider it carefully.

 

Big hug to everyone!

[maxwellissmart]

#4 is my least favorite because it lacks energy. The remote trigger control in your right hand is distracting.

 

The crop of the foot in #3 is a tad amputee. Some people are into that. Don't like the lighting hot-spots on your chest and torso. A different light source would have come in handy here.

 

#2 is OK but it looks like you're very intent on not showing any part of your face, which never sends a good message, IMO.

 

#1 seems to hit all the right chords, except I would change the graphics. There's room for a great font/name-logo but the font design you selected does nothing for me.

 

Some escorts post almost every image from a shoot, which, IMO, is a disaster. Even though the lighting is basically the same in all 4, the poses are completely different as well as the body language. So, similar? Yes, but not really.

 

The similar that annoys me (and marks someone as not having a clue) is the escort who can't edit. Most fall into this category.

 

Good luck.

 

I disagree about #4—I think it's reminiscent of a classic Charles Atlas pose, but would be better cropped tighter and in a slightly more dramatic fashion. I actually love the font (and you could even go up a step and use a lighter version), but the color/leading/justification is awkward.

[JackTwist]

Juan, I think all four are very sexy images and accentuate your various physical attribute quite nicely: 1) big bulge; 2) built legs and big arms; 3) tight, hard abs/strong core;

4) muscular bubble-ass. They don't seem "too similar" to me. Posting all four would serve you extremely well, imho.

[+ sam.fitzpatrick]

Arnie (f/k/a Juan)

 

The one thing #4 does better than the other photos is highlight your tan line. That is a turn on for me.

 

Just saying - Sam.

[Pegasus]

#2 and #3 are my favorites. I can't see where you would go wrong with including any or all of them in your ads. If you feel they are too similar, consider occasionally rotating the pics in and out of your ad--keeping it fresh.

[MFLV]

Juan

I can't help you since I am trying to catch my breath since those pictures took it away!! When are you coming to the East Coast?!!!

[JT Brooklyn]

Hey Sweet Stuff! JT likes #2 & #4 ... brings back Memorie's of your NYC Visit! Enjoy your Travels as I know you always have...

[Decatur Guy]

Your ass is STUNNING in No. 2.

[jawjateck]

Things happen fast in Daddy's world. His review page already has one of those fresh pics. Showing off that stuffed jock......HOT!

[zeyfur]

What I like about the pics is that none of them reveal the whole package and this increases your anticipation all the more.