raulgmanzo

There are a few tricks, feeling and watching for precum, feeling the balls as the cremaster muscle tightens, the anus, which if you get them to clench will often delay cumming, something as simple as pinching the head of the dick between thumb and index finger can give one a lot of control over the sub being able to cum. What is more dificult is to let them cum or orgasm but not both at the same time.

Edging someone while they are bound is great fun. I do that regularly to quite a few of my regular clients. I love that at first they are like "no, don't make me cum this soon" as I bring them really close to the edge. Then it changes after a bit to "Please let me cum". This is a case where taking time while doing some rope bindings works quite well. A little carress here and there, tweaking the nipples, tapping on the balls etc before building intensity and focus on the guys cock and prostrate etc. And then when they do cum? Well its fun to see how many guys who think they can only cum once are in fact quite capable of cumming again.

I believe that according to the Torah the hiring of foreign providers is okay. For example Judah believing Tamar to be a prostitute. What clearly is not allowed is sending ones Jewish daughters of into the oldest profession. Raul While I can't claim to be Jewish my family seems to have some crypto-judaism and Spanish Converso back ground.

Well that doesn't mean that it is fun to go exploring of the street scene. Call me crazy but I have enjoyed watching and investigating street scenes from Baltimore to Bangkok and Chicago to Chapultepec, it is just fascinating. Raul http://daddysreviews.com/review/raul_g_chicago

Ha! For someone as special as you I'll get you a sedan chair! Or at the least I'll pull out my trusty tandem, don't worry I'll do all the pedaling and you can even put your feet up on the handle bars or my back. I definitely have a little bit of mule in me and not just because I'm stubborn.

Sorry but a change of 2% is hardly a swing or nuts. Sure it's over a short period of time but so is the changes on many a stock price if you look closely and often enough. My thermometer right now is madly flickering back and forth from 45 to 46 degrees. Oh my god whats going on with the weather? I've no idea why people bother following these prices so closely. It's really no different than freaking out about fluctuations in the price of gold or the market price for the catch of the day at a restaurant. BFD. If you actually have some place to go, like work, or shopping (for which you refuse to walk) then the price of gas is probably going to be trivial compared with what you are earning or spending whereever you are going. The energy in a gallon of gasoline is HUGE. Enough to blow ones house to tiny bits, haul TONS of steel (your car) up a lot of steep hills, or power your ipod or iphone for months if not years. Gasoline in the USA is still ridiculously cheap. If it weren't so cheap then more people might actually have cars with high MPG or more people might actually bike, or walk, which would surely be great for our physical and community health. But as long as there are lots of cars getting 12 MPG instead of 40 and as long as most people drive alone I can't believe that the price of gasoline is actually very high. How about putting some of this energy of price shock into something useful like helping to get more bicycle lanes or better transit or HELL even a sidewalk?

Well the gay and gay friendly neighborhoods are always shifting if at times very slowly. And where to look and when to look is often difficult to pin down. But that is what makes it so fun. Watching, exploring, street scenes has been an interest of mine since before I moved to Chicago. Though I'm sort of surprised more people are not interested in it. These scenes are never easy to describe because once the information gets published or posted there will inevitably be pressure for it to move, change or go deeper underground. Also a whole lot of it is random.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aclS1pGHp8o

---- Someone wrote: > it's that I don't realy buy into this whole global warming thing. With or without global warming and with or without man contributing to the warming, there are still many compelling reasons why individuals might choose to use a car less. Health, and fitness (it's how I stay in shape), is something many on this board can appreciate. There are many reasons why we, our government and planners should resist policies that favor car use. Car oriented development is often at the expense of pedestrian, bicycle friendliness, a healthful environment and good foreign policy. If someone wants to drive a car instead of walk, bicycle, bus, or train then they should have that choice. But we should know what the costs are and those of us who choose to drive should be willing to shoulder most of the related costs. In the U.S. we go to great lengths to keep driving accessible and seemingly affordable to a great number of people. Adjusted for inflation gas prices are not terribly high. Hasn't increased like eggs or the price of lumber. And inspite of little increase in MPG since 92 our cars get double the MPG that they did in the 50s and 60s. In fact the fact that U.S. average MPG has not kept up with the rest of the world over the last 15 years tells me that gas is still very affordable. The number one cause of death to our youth is car crashes, more than guns, drugs or gangs. And even more people are believed killed by car pollution than car crashes. Car exhaust contains known carcinogens. The amount of oil that ends up in waterways from parking lot runnoff and oil changing is like several Exxon Valdez oil spills every year. Refining oil into gasoline consumes large amounts of water and causes large amounts of air, land and water pollution. Ground level ozone is a very problematic pollutant not just for people but there is evidence that it reduces crop yields. Now there is mounting evidence that the enormous amounts of very fine particulates shed from brake pads causes health problems including possibly contributing to heart trouble. It's not hard to see that many places have become unpleasant or dangerous to walk because we have widened roads, neglected sidewalks, and spread development out so has to allow for greater amounts of parking. In 1970 ninety-something percent of school kids either walked or bicycled to school. Now it is somewhere around 2 or three percent. While there have been other factors such as bussing etc. there is no doubt that as we drive more and more it becomes less safe to walk, and schools are built further away to allow parking and attempt to reduce automobile congestion. As we reduce our residential and commercial densities we push our agriculture out and find more and more food shipped from afar. Obviously our huge gas use complicates U.S. foreign policy. Nearly everybody could reduce their driving. And many of them would be healthier for it. But it must be their choice. The individual can best determine the best solutions himself but only if we know and pay the costs of our choices. Some accountants have attempted to quantify the external costs of our car use. And the smallest estimates are in the hundreds of billions of dollars each year. That is not including environmental damage for which we will have to eventually pay. Adding a fee to the cost of gas is one way for an indivual driver to understand and pay the costs associated with his car use. In the 80's a fairly conservative estimate indicated that motorists would have to pay about $3 a gallon tax to pay their way. Estimates including real environmental costs are often several times greater. There was an article in Scientific American that estimated that even BEFORE the Gulf War military costs paid from tax dollars amounted to $50 a barrel. I'll have to look for the name of the study in NY that estimated that government provides an effective subsidy of about $19 per gallon of gas. Well thats enough rambling from me. But if anyone wants some encouragement to incorporate walking, running, bicycling, or transit into their life just contact me. Really I don't know how so many people find time to drive (I HOPE your not reading, sleeping or exercising while driving) AND go to the gym. Raul

>...love guys that wear tank tops... >... a guy who will find a way to "forget" his >deodorant for my sake is definite marriage material!:-) Even when I've shaved my body hair I always leave my arm pit hair. Just doesn't feel or look right without it. Also think it looks better when I leave my pubic hair. Haven't used deoderant for a few years now. I know that might terrify some folk. There are the occasional times it stinks, like if I'm really nervous or frightened. Must be the flight or fight thing. But most of the time people say I smell nice or sexy. I think initially giving up deoderant is a problem because the normal and natural chemistry of the pits might be out of whack. Of course its important to wash frequently but not with harsh cleaners which seem to mess with the chemical or microbe balance. Perhaps most important is keeping ones pits aired out and dry and having any sweat be fresh. It seems to me that active sweat of a healthy person smells sexy but old sweat of someone not usually active can be unpleasant. I love wearing tanktops which help keep me aired and fresh. Many of my partners have appreciated that my pits taste like man instead of deoderant. Hmmmm i need to post some arm pit pictures. Raul http://rentboy.com/RaulGManzo http://daddysreviews.com/finder.php?who=raul_g_chicago

Gasoline is not really very expensive Greg has the right idea, get a scooter, use less. Adjusted for inflation gasoline is still a bit less than in 1981 when it would have cost nearly $3. Gasoline would have cost about $2.00 (in todays dollars) in the 1950s. So the price has increased almost 50%, but in the same time MPG has increased 100%. So even though fuel economy has largely been stagnant since 1990 you only need half as much. The reason fuel economy has been stagnant? Because in practice gasoline is very CHEAP. And the oil companies and car manufacturers have had a bunch of friends in the white house and congress. Gasoline is cheaper than milk. The average MPG for passenger cars is 27mpg (though in europe is is 40 and in Japan it is 45). If you're driving 10 miles to see an escort your going to pay like a dollar or two in fuel. Even a hundred miles is going to be like 10 bucks, big deal. Maybe we should increase the price of gasoline and use less of it. We'd pollute less, be healthier by walking more, and preserve open and natural space. Perhaps we'd stop supporting tyrant kings (against the wishes of their subjects) in oil producing countries. http://economics.about.com/od/gastaxandpigouclub/f/emissions.htm If instead of adding lanes to roads we built sidewalks and bike lanes we might be surprised how easy it would be to drive less. During the 70s Ivan Illich calculated the time one spends on transportation including the work one has to do to pay for their car: "The model American puts in 1600 hours to get 7500 miles: less than five miles per hour. In countries deprived of a transportation industry, people manage to do the same, walking wherever they want to go, and they allocate only 3 to 8 percent of their society's time budget to traffic instead of 28 percent."

As has been mentioned elsewhere the internet has seemingly diminshed the street trade. But it is NOT dead! In the past month I've seen a few boys working Halsted in boystown, Clark near boystown, in andersenville and ... just a few days ago I saw a hustler working .. drum-roll please .... CLark and Hubbard! Hooray. How successful they were I don't know. And of course for all I know some of it was staged roll play as talked about in another thread. Also in the last couple months I've seen the escort trade plied in a few bars. Little Jims, Cocktail, and Lucky Horseshoe all on Halsted in Boystown and also downtown at Second Story Bar. My inside information on these is that they were not staged, were very successful, and in at least two cases have already resulted in repeat business. Raul

I also regularly get foot inquiries, which is great. And have taken a number of foot photos which I've yet to post. You should trim your nails etc before taking pics or seeing a client. My personal taste (and that of many of my clients) seems to be that a pedicure is not necessary but okay if you don't end up with feet that look fussy. And giving yourself a foot massage before the photo or an appointment will help your feet look and feel good. Growing up in the tropics I was barefoot a lot and developed an appreciation for the dexterity, and strength of the human foot. I still prefer barefeet for tree or rock climbing and occasionally give a handjob (footjob?) and do nipple play using my feet. Raul USA shoe size: 11.5