The 4-hand massage chain

[viewing ownly]

It's kind of cool to read in an ad of someone appealing that he offers a 4-hand with guy "X". You go to guy X's  page, discover he's rather attractive as well, and see in his ad that he does 4-hand with guy "Y", who is a completely different guy. You go to that guy Y's page, thankful that you otherwise would've never known about him, and find him the most attractive of the 3.....but his ad is expired. 

Something I've learned is that while you cannot reach the new guy you now want to see due to his ad being down, the guy who does 4-hand with him can. It just may take doing that 4-hand to then get the other guy's contact direct. 

I had my first 4-hand this year, and it will be a memory to cherish. I recommend doing them with guys who advertise as a duo to begin with, as their experience will provide a likely better time. 

[lifeofbrian88]

I always wondered the appeal since it can be quite a bit more. Is the actual massage with 4 hands better? Or is the "extras" better with a duo? What was your experience if you don't mind sharing. 

[jeezifonly]

On paper, four hands sounds more promising than two. When you're booking what's attached to four, remember that you may be putting twice the amount of your own time and effort in, just getting all hands to show up in the same room. I learned early that it's not for me. If you're able to discern the differences in touch, technique and knowledge between two masseurs hired weeks apart, you'll be amazed at how much that discernment will be calling all the plays, in your head, through the entire session! 

 

[viewing ownly]

I'm looking for extras, preferably with guys who have lots of massage experience, and know how to turn up the heat. My 4-hand experience was what I was looking for, with the massage turning into sex, and as the person who made the arrangement, I got to come last. 

I once did a nude massage with a bisexual couple at the man's suggestion, and it was terrible. I still wish I saw him one additional time for the amount that was wasted on his not-at-all-enjoyable partner with him. However, the only plus I was able to take away from that experience was that she made him rock hard, which he never was in any of my appointments. Erect beer can-sized cocks are a joy. 

[Mark_fl]

I have enough stress finding one guy I'm comfortable with. Even if there were two guys I both liked, I'm more into a one on one connection. But I do think it would be wise to let the guy you know you like find a third he knows. Then neither of you would have to worry about them as much.

[theplayerking]

I would only do four hands with a duo that actively markets that as a specialized service. Even then it’s usually disappointing. I don’t bother with four hands anymore. 

[+ JamesB]

To be fair, I've only had one four-hand massage, and I really didn't feel the need to repeat the experience. For one, they typically cost 1.5 to 2 times as much as a regular massage but the added benefit isn't necessarily proportional. You're not getting twice the satisfaction, just a different sensory experience. It also requires good coordination between the two masseurs. When they're not perfectly synchronized, the experience can feel disjointed or even distracting rather than relaxing. And if you're sensitive to touch, having two people working on you simultaneously can sometimes feel like sensory overload.

Personally, I'd much rather have two separate massages than one four-hand session.

[Nightowl]

A masseur I used to frequent once told me that four hands is appealing but is ultimately distracting as four hands roam over your body.  All four can’t be in an erogenous zone—no room—so you end up with split sensations, one set of hands exploring between your legs and another working on your calves.  I’ve never had the experience (though I would like to) but this was one of the reasons he stopped offering it